Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
Analyze events through the disciplinary lens of law, applying rigorous legal methodologies (statutory interpretation, case law analysis, legal reasoning), constitutional principles, procedural frameworks, substantive legal doctrines across multiple domains (contracts, torts, property, criminal, constitutional, administrative, international), and professional ethical standards to understand legal rights and obligations, assess liabilities and risks, identify applicable authorities, and recommend legally sound strategies.
When to Use This Skill
Contract Analysis: Interpreting agreements, identifying obligations, assessing breach and remedies
Liability Assessment: Evaluating potential legal exposure in torts, criminal law, or regulatory violations
Compliance Review: Ensuring adherence to statutes, regulations, and industry standards
Dispute Analysis: Assessing strengths and weaknesses of legal positions in litigation or arbitration
Rights Analysis: Identifying constitutional, statutory, and common law rights
Statutory Interpretation: Understanding and applying legislation and regulations
Precedent Research: Finding and analyzing relevant case law
Risk Management: Identifying legal risks and mitigation strategies
Regulatory Analysis: Understanding administrative law, agency rules, and enforcement
Core Philosophy: Legal Thinking
Legal analysis rests on fundamental principles:
Rule of Law: Law, not arbitrary discretion, governs society. Everyone, including government, is subject to law. Predictability and stability are essential.
Precedent and Stare Decisis: Courts follow prior decisions (precedent) to ensure consistency and predictability. "Stand by things decided." Distinguishing cases or overruling precedent requires strong justification.
Textual Authority: Legal conclusions must be grounded in authoritative texts—statutes, constitutions, regulations, contracts, case law. Personal preferences are irrelevant.
Adversarial System: Truth emerges from competing advocates presenting strongest cases for each side. Lawyers have duty to zealously represent clients within bounds of law.
Burden of Proof: Party asserting claim bears burden of proving it. Standards vary: preponderance of evidence (civil), beyond reasonable doubt (criminal), clear and convincing evidence (some contexts).
Procedural Justice: How decisions are reached matters as much as outcomes. Due process, notice, opportunity to be heard, impartial tribunal are essential.
Legal Realism: Law is not purely logical or mechanical. Judges are humans influenced by facts, policy, and context. Understanding outcomes requires considering more than just rules.
Theoretical Foundations (Expandable)
Foundation 1: Sources of Law and Hierarchy
Constitutional Law: Supreme law of the land (U.S. context)
U.S. Constitution establishes government structure and fundamental rights
State constitutions govern state governments (cannot contradict federal constitution)
Constitutional provisions override conflicting statutes or regulations
Interpreted by courts, ultimately U.S. Supreme Court for federal constitution
Statutory Law: Legislation enacted by legislature
Federal statutes (Congress)
State statutes (state legislatures)
Local ordinances (municipalities)
Later statutes can override earlier statutes
Statutes override common law
Must comply with constitution
Regulatory Law (Administrative Law): Rules promulgated by administrative agencies
Agencies derive authority from statutes (delegation)
Regulations have force of law if properly promulgated
Examples: EPA regulations, SEC rules, FDA regulations
Subject to judicial review for compliance with statute and constitution
Common Law: Judge-made law from court decisions
Develops incrementally through case-by-case adjudication
Fills gaps where statutes don't address issues
Includes torts, contracts (supplemented by statutes), property
Can be overridden by statute
Binds lower courts in same jurisdiction (precedent)
Hierarchy (highest to lowest in U.S. federal system):
U.S. Constitution
Federal statutes and treaties
Federal regulations
State constitutions
State statutes
State regulations
Common law
Supremacy Clause: Federal law supreme over state law when conflict exists (U.S. Constitution Article VI)
Undue influence: Unfair persuasion taking advantage of relationship
Mistake: Erroneous belief about fact material to contract (mutual mistake may allow rescission)
Unconscionability: Contract so one-sided as to be oppressive
Performance and Breach:
Substantial performance: Materially performed obligations (minor deviations don't excuse other party)
Material breach: Serious failure to perform (excuses other party's performance, allows damages)
Anticipatory repudiation: Party indicates won't perform before performance due
Remedies:
Damages: Monetary compensation
Expectation damages: Put injured party in position if contract performed
Reliance damages: Reimburse expenses incurred in reliance
Restitution: Restore benefit conferred to prevent unjust enrichment
Specific performance: Court orders breaching party to perform (rare, typically for unique goods like land)
Rescission: Undo contract, restore parties to pre-contract position
Parol Evidence Rule: Extrinsic evidence (oral statements, prior drafts) generally inadmissible to contradict written contract if contract is fully integrated
Statute of Frauds: Certain contracts must be in writing (e.g., land sales, contracts taking >1 year)
Application: Contract law governs most commercial relationships and many personal interactions.
Purpose: Systematic framework for legal analysis and writing
Components:
Issue: What legal question must be resolved?
Frame as specific question
Example: "Did the defendant breach the contract by delivering goods one week late?"
Rule: What legal rule governs?
Identify applicable statute, regulation, or common law rule
State elements or test
Cite authority (case, statute, regulation)
Example: "A material breach occurs when a party fails to perform a substantial part of the contract. Smith v. Jones, 123 F.3d 456 (9th Cir. 2020)."
Application (Analysis): Apply rule to facts
Match facts to rule elements
Analogize to or distinguish from precedent cases
Consider counterarguments
Example: "Here, the contract specified delivery by June 1. Defendant delivered June 8, one week late. However, plaintiff was able to use the goods and suffered no damages. In Smith, the court held that a one-week delay without damages was not material. Similarly here..."
Conclusion: Answer the issue question
Based on analysis, what is result?
Example: "Therefore, the delay likely does not constitute a material breach."
Variations:
CREAC: Conclusion, Rule, Explanation, Application, Conclusion (leads with conclusion)
TRAC: Thesis, Rule, Application, Conclusion (similar to CREAC)
Application: IRAC provides structure for legal memos, briefs, and exam answers.
Determine what claims client can assert (or what claims asserted against client)
Determine what defenses are available
Assess elements and evidence for each claim and defense
Outputs:
List of claims with elements and evidence
List of defenses with elements and evidence
Step 6: Assess Procedural Posture and Options
Actions:
Determine current procedural stage
Identify procedural options (motion to dismiss, summary judgment, settlement, trial)
Assess strategic implications of each option
Outputs:
Procedural roadmap
Strategic options
Step 7: Evaluate Risks and Likely Outcomes
Actions:
Assess likelihood of success on each issue
Consider range of potential outcomes (best case, worst case, likely case)
Evaluate risks of litigation vs. settlement
Consider costs (financial, time, reputational)
Outputs:
Risk assessment
Range of outcomes with probabilities
Step 8: Identify and Evaluate Remedies
Actions:
Determine what remedies are available (damages, injunction, etc.)
Quantify damages if possible
Assess feasibility of non-monetary remedies
Outputs:
Remedies analysis
Damages calculation
Step 9: Consider Settlement and Alternative Resolutions
Actions:
Assess client's BATNA
Estimate other side's BATNA
Identify settlement range
Consider ADR options
Outputs:
Settlement analysis
BATNA assessment
ADR recommendations
Step 10: Provide Legal Advice and Recommendations
Actions:
Synthesize analysis
Provide clear advice on options
Recommend strategy
Identify next steps
Outputs:
Legal memorandum or client letter
Strategic recommendations
Action plan
Usage Examples
Example 1: Contract Dispute - Breach of Software Development Agreement
Facts:
Company A hired Company B to develop custom software
Contract specified: completion by June 1, payment of $100,000 upon delivery
Company B delivered software on June 15 (two weeks late)
Software had bugs that Company A claims make it unusable
Company A refuses to pay; Company B sues for breach
Analysis:
Step 1 - Facts:
Contract: Software development, $100K, due June 1
Actual: Delivered June 15, buggy
Dispute: Company A refuses to pay, claims material breach; Company B claims substantial performance
Step 2 - Issues:
Did Company B breach the contract?
If yes, was breach material or minor?
Is Company A excused from payment?
What damages, if any, can each party recover?
Step 3 - Law:
Contract law applies (state common law + UCC Article 2 if goods involved)
Material breach: Failure to perform substantial part of contract excuses other party's performance
Substantial performance: Minor deviations don't excuse other party if substantially performed
Perfect tender rule (UCC goods): Buyer can reject if goods or delivery fail in any respect to conform (but right to cure)
Service contracts: Substantial performance doctrine typically applies
Step 4 - Analysis (IRAC):
Issue 1: Was there a breach?
Rule: Breach occurs when party fails to perform obligation
Application: Company B was obligated to deliver working software by June 1. Delivered late and with bugs. This is breach.
Conclusion: Yes, Company B breached.
Issue 2: Was breach material?
Rule: Material breach is substantial failure to perform that defeats purpose of contract. Factors: extent of breach, likelihood of cure, detriment to non-breaching party.
Application:
Late delivery: Two weeks late. Is this substantial? Depends on whether time was "of the essence" (contract doesn't say).
Bugs: Are bugs minor (easily fixed) or major (software unusable)? Company A claims unusable but must prove.
If bugs are minor and fixable, breach may not be material. If bugs render software unusable, likely material.
Analog case: Jacob & Youngs v. Kent - Minor deviation (wrong brand of pipe) was not material breach where function identical.
Distinguish: If bugs prevent use, unlike wrong pipe brand, this affects function.
Conclusion: Depends on severity of bugs. If minor and fixable, not material. If severe, likely material.
Issue 3: Is Company A excused from payment?
Rule: Material breach excuses other party's performance. Minor breach does not excuse but may allow damages.
Application: If breach is material (unusable software), Company A is excused from payment. If not material, Company A must pay but can offset damages.
Conclusion: Conditional on materiality determination.
Issue 4: Damages?
Rule: Expectation damages put non-breaching party in position if contract performed.
Application:
If Company A prevails: Damages = cost to fix bugs or cost to procure substitute software, plus consequential damages (lost profits if provable)
If Company B prevails: $100K contract price minus any offset for Company A's damages from late delivery
Conclusion: Depends on outcome of breach analysis.
Step 5 - Claims and Defenses:
Company B's claim: Breach of contract (Company A failed to pay)
Elements: Valid contract ✓, Performance or excuse ✓ (substantial performance?), Breach by Company A ✓ (non-payment), Damages ✓ ($100K)
Defense by Company A: Company B's material breach excuses payment
Company A's counterclaim: Breach of contract (late delivery, defective product)
Elements: Valid contract ✓, Performance or excuse ✓ (Company A was ready to pay), Breach by Company B ✓, Damages (cost to cure bugs)
Step 6 - Procedural Options:
Company B has filed suit
Company A should file answer with affirmative defense (material breach) and counterclaim
Discovery: Obtain evidence of bug severity (expert testimony, testing)
Motion for summary judgment: If bugs clearly minor or clearly severe, move for summary judgment
Step 7 - Risk Assessment:
Key factual issue: How severe are bugs?
If bugs minor: Company B likely prevails, recovers most or all of $100K minus offset
If bugs severe: Company A likely prevails, owes nothing or reduced amount, may recover damages
Litigation risk: Cost, time, uncertain outcome
Step 8 - Remedies:
Company B: Contract price ($100K) minus offset for late delivery and cure cost
Company A: Cost to cure bugs, consequential damages (if provable)
Step 9 - Settlement:
BATNA for Company B: Win at trial, recover $100K minus offset (~$80-100K), but litigation costs and risk
BATNA for Company A: Win at trial, pay nothing or reduced amount, but litigation costs and risk
Settlement range: Probably $50K-$80K plus agreement for Company B to fix bugs
Step 10 - Recommendation:
To Company A: Assess bug severity with expert. If severe, strong defense. If minor, settle for reduced price + bug fixes. Avoid litigation costs.
To Company B: Fix bugs immediately, offer settlement (reduced price), argue substantial performance. Litigation risk high.
Example 2: Tort Liability - Slip and Fall at Grocery Store
Facts:
Plaintiff shopping at grocery store
Slipped on water spill in produce section
Fell, broke wrist
Store employee testified water had been there "maybe 10-15 minutes"
No warning sign or cone
Analysis:
Step 1 - Facts:
Plaintiff slipped on water at defendant's store
Water present for 10-15 minutes without cleanup or warning
Plaintiff suffered broken wrist
Step 2 - Issues:
Is store liable for plaintiff's injuries (negligence)?
Does plaintiff have defenses reducing recovery (comparative negligence)?
What damages can plaintiff recover?
Step 3 - Law:
Premises liability: Property owner owes duty to invitees (business visitors) to exercise reasonable care
