Drafts FAR 9.5-compliant Organizational Conflict of Interest mitigation plans for federal government contractors. Analyzes unequal access, impaired objectivity, and biased ground rules conflicts, then produces firewalls, recusals, compliance architecture, and certifications. Use when responding to solicitations with OCI concerns, preparing proposals requiring OCI disclosure, or drafting conflict mitigation documents.
Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
Drafts FAR 9.5-compliant Organizational Conflict of Interest mitigation plans for federal government contractors. Analyzes unequal access, impaired objectivity, and biased ground rules conflicts, then produces firewalls, recusals, compliance architecture, and certifications. Use when responding to solicitations with OCI concerns, preparing proposals requiring OCI disclosure, or drafting conflict mitigation documents.
Produces a complete OCI mitigation plan under FAR Subpart 9.5 covering conflict identification, tailored mitigation strategies, compliance architecture, and binding certifications.
Personnel Recusal — objective recusal criteria, documentation/approval process, backfill procedures, communication of restrictions
Disclosure & Transparency — categories subject to ongoing disclosure, notification timeframes, regular reporting cadence, government recipients and format
Business Activity Restrictions (when firewalls insufficient) — non-competition commitments, information use restrictions, divestiture/relationship termination, scope reductions
Section 4: Implementation & Compliance
Governance: Designate OCI Compliance Officer with independence from program management, direct executive access, authority to halt activities.
Training: All contract personnel receive initial + annual training on FAR OCI principles and specific restrictions. Supervisors, BD staff, and new hires to affected programs receive targeted training. Require signed acknowledgments.
Monitoring & Audit: Active verification (access logs, recusal records, firewall integrity), compliance reviews at defined intervals, documented investigation reports.
Periodic Certifications: Quarterly certifications to CO affirming plan effectiveness, disclosing violations/remediations, flagging changed circumstances. Senior official signs with due diligence.
Change Management: Define material change triggers (reorgs, personnel moves, new relationships, scope changes). Prompt CO notification. Written OCI assessment before modifications.
Corrective Action: Immediate containment → investigation → root cause → discipline → systemic fix → full CO disclosure with remediation plan.
Section 5: Binding Certification
Draft certification by authorized corporate officer:
CERTIFICATION
I, [Name], [Title], of [Contractor Legal Name], hereby certify that:
1. The foregoing OCI analysis is complete and accurate after reasonable inquiry;
2. All material facts bearing on potential conflicts have been disclosed;
3. [Contractor] commits to implementing mitigation measures as described;
4. This plan, upon government acceptance, constitutes a binding contractual obligation;
5. Non-compliance may result in: termination for default, suspension/debarment,
referral for investigation, and all other available remedies.
_____________________________
Name / Title / Organization / Date
Certifying official must have binding authority (corporate officer or equivalent). For subsidiaries, assess whether parent ratification is needed.
Checks
No boilerplate — every mitigation must be tailored to the identified conflict; generic firewalls without factual grounding will be rejected
Appearance matters — mitigate conflicts creating appearance of impropriety even if actual harm is unlikely
Temporal scope — address both performance-period and post-performance residual conflicts
Agency supplements — flag when DFARS, NFS, or other supplements impose additional requirements [VERIFY citations against current regulations]
Regulatory basis — FAR 9.504 (CO responsibilities), 9.505 (representations), 9.505-1 through 9.505-4 (specific conflict types)
Tone — professional, candid, formal; avoid defensive posturing
