| name | fintech-regulatory-summaries |
| title | Fintech Regulatory Summaries |
| description | Generates structured regulatory summaries for fintech compliance covering crypto, payments, lending, mobile banking, and money transmission. Covers CFPB, SEC, CFTC, FinCEN, OCC, Federal Reserve, and state regulators with urgency triage and compliance deadlines. Use when compliance officers or legal teams need recent regulatory updates, agency guidance monitoring, or regulatory status reports. |
| author | CaseMark |
| author_url | https://github.com/CaseMark/skills/tree/main/skills/legal/fintech-regulatory-summaries |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| version | 0.1.0 |
| execution_mode | open |
| jurisdiction | us |
| practice | regulatory |
| language | en |
Fintech Regulatory Summaries
Produces structured regulatory updates for fintech compliance officers and legal counsel to identify critical developments, deadlines, and required actions.
Quick Start
Gather before generating:
- Sectors — crypto, payments, lending, mobile banking, regtech
- Time window — default 90 days; adjust as needed
- Jurisdictions — federal only, specific states, or multi-jurisdictional
- Business context (optional) — company's regulated activities for materiality tailoring
Output Structure
1. Executive Overview
3–5 bullets, each with:
- What changed — rule/guidance/enforcement action + agency
- Who it affects — specific fintech activity or model
- Urgency —
Immediate / Near-Term / Monitor
- Deadline — effective date or comment period close
2. Detailed Analysis
Per development:
| Field | Content |
|---|
| Source | Agency, title, FR citation or docket no. [VERIFY] |
| Effective/Comment Date | Date or "Proposed — Comment by [date]" |
| Sectors Affected | Crypto exchanges / Processors / Lenders / MSBs |
| Key Requirements | Numbered compliance obligations from regulatory text |
| Ambiguities | Interpretive uncertainty or pending guidance |
| Recommended Action | Next steps: update policies, file comments, gap analysis |
3. Regulatory Overlap Map
Flag where multiple frameworks apply to one development (e.g., crypto custody implicating SEC + OCC + FinCEN). Note federal/state conflicts or gaps.
4. State Spotlight (if applicable)
Cover divergence in:
- Money transmitter licensing (MTL)
- State crypto/digital asset frameworks
- Consumer lending rate caps or disclosure rules
5. International Context (crypto/cross-border only)
Note alignment or divergence with EU MiCA, FATF guidance, or major foreign regulator actions material to U.S. multinationals.
