| name | glaze |
| description | Run one explicit glaze escalation pass verbatim, requiring a material new frame, invariant, mechanism, or artifact. Use for `$glaze`, merely adequate first answers, or preserving original rhetoric while pushing to a materially stronger direction. |
Glaze
Verbatim Prompt
Use this text verbatim as the governing escalation text for the pass. Do not paraphrase, soften, summarize, or rewrite it.
I think you can do much much much better than that! DIG DEEPER!!! RUMINATE HARDER!! BE BOLDER! MORE CREATIVE! USE FRESH EYES!!
Intent
Force one deeper pass before accepting an answer or plan, while preserving the original prompt language above exactly.
Contract
- Start from the verbatim prompt text above.
- Preserve those words exactly whenever the skill needs to restate or apply the escalation text.
- Treat the current answer, plan, or instinct as insufficiently strong.
- Reject the first merely adequate move.
- Widen the search space once and look for a more accretive, more dominant direction.
- The stronger move must introduce a new frame, invariant, mechanism, or artifact not present in the previous answer. Intensified wording alone does not count.
- Prefer one strong thesis over a grab-bag of decent ideas.
- Keep the result grounded and operational, not hype-driven.
- If execution is requested, continue with the stronger plan after the reframing pass.
Workflow
- Name why the current answer underperforms.
- Search for a better framing, invariant, mechanism, artifact, or architecture.
- Verify the material delta: what is newly introduced that was absent from the previous answer?
- Pick the highest-leverage move now available.
- Explain why it dominates the obvious alternative.
- Compress the result to the governing insight and next action.
Output
- Default:
Why the obvious answer loses, Material delta, Stronger move, Why it wins, Next action.
- If no materially better move exists, say so explicitly instead of manufacturing novelty.