Pre-release checklist and quality gate to verify codebase health, docs, and security before interacting with Git. Activate when preparing to tag/publish a release, concluding milestones, or running final verification on a pull request. Use when this capability is needed.
Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
Pre-release checklist and quality gate to verify codebase health, docs, and security before interacting with Git. Activate when preparing to tag/publish a release, concluding milestones, or running final verification on a pull request. Use when this capability is needed.
metadata
{"author":"danicat"}
Pre-Release Checklist & Quality Gate
This skill establishes the authoritative pre-release quality gate checklist. It ensures that before any release candidate is packaged, tagged, or committed, the workspace is fully verified against compiling standards, security practices, and documentation completeness.
1. The Golden Rule of Releases
[!CAUTION]
YOU ARE ONLY ALLOWED TO TOUCH GIT (stage, commit, tag, push, or release) AFTER THIS CHECKLIST IS 100% COMPLETED AND VERIFIED.
This absolute boundary ensures that we never publish invalid, uncompilable, unsecured, or poorly documented releases to the community or package registries.
2. The 15-Point Pre-Release Checklist
Before performing any Git operations to finalize a release, you must run and check off every single item on this list:
Codebase Health & Quality
1. Compilation Check: Does the code compile successfully without warnings or errors? (Run GoDoctor's smart_build or go build ./...).
2. Test Verification: Do all unit, integration, and workspace tests pass successfully? (Run GoDoctor's smart_build or go test ./...).
3. Linter Compliance: Are all linting errors, style warnings, cognitive complexity alerts, and static check findings fully addressed? (Check golangci-lint or running compiler gates).
4. Regression Assessment: Did you explicitly check for regressions? Verify that new changes do not break legacy features, old command flags, or backwards-compatible setups.
5. Functional Correctness: Does the software work exactly as expected? Manually verify standard user stories, happy path scenarios, and failure inputs to confirm the logic is sound.
Versioning & Assets
6. Version Bumps: Are versions bumped correctly across all manifests, config files, and registry files (e.g. gemini-extension.json, go.mod, plugin.json or equivalent)?
7. Release Files Alignment: Are all release-specific packaging files (e.g., .goreleaser.yaml or build script lists) fully updated to include all newly introduced files and exclude deleted ones?
8. Software & Model Versions: Are all external software, library dependencies, and LLM model identifiers verified to be up to date and correct in the real world (using the latest-version skill)?
9. CI/CD & Release Workflow Audit: Did you check the CI/CD workflow configurations (such as .github/workflows/ or build pipeline scripts) to verify automated release triggers? Ensure the correct Git release tags are prepared, created, and pushed to the remote repository so the packaging run does not fail.
Documentation & Decisions
10. README Precision: Is the README.md file completely up to date, mapping the exact current list of features, setup requirements, installation details, and CLI options?
11. Context-Sensitive Files: Are all context-sensitive system prompt guides (such as GODOCTOR.md or CLAUDE.md) updated to reflect the absolute latest tool registries and boundaries?
12. General Documentation: Are all other developer guides, operational runbooks, and documentation files fully aligned and clear?
13. Decision Records: Are all architectural decisions fully documented? Ensure all key choices have active, numbered ADRs under design/adr/ (with superseded decisions cleanly archived).
Security & Compliance
14. Security Review: Have you conducted a security review for common attack vectors? (e.g., input sanitization, safe command execution, access control restrictions on paths, session separation).
15. Credential Leak Check: Have you checked that absolutely no credentials, API keys, private keys, or passwords are leaked, either in environment files (.env), temporary files, or inline within the source code?
3. Execution Protocol
If any checklist item fails, you must HALT the release process immediately.
Fix the underlying issue (e.g. correct the broken test, fix the linter warning, update the doc).
Rerun the failed check.
Once all 15 boxes are checked [x], you are formally authorized to proceed with the Git commit, version tagging, and publishing sequence.
