| name | openclaw-notebooklm-auditor |
| description | Specialized skill to audit, optimize, and maintain the NotebookLM workspace for "OpenClaw: The Universal Personal AI Assistant Platform". Use this skill when you need to: (1) audit or clean sources in the main OpenClaw notebook or any of its 4 sub-notebooks, (2) remove duplicate, obsolete, or low-value sources from any OpenClaw NotebookLM notebook, (3) configure or update the AI persona/instructions for any OpenClaw sub-notebook, (4) validate the retrieval quality of OpenClaw knowledge bases, (5) do any deep research, pruning, or restructuring task related to the OpenClaw NotebookLM workspace.
|
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| metadata | {"version":"1.0","capabilities":["notebooklm-auditing","openclaw","content-pruning","persona-configuration","deep-research"]} |
OpenClaw NotebookLM Auditor
This skill provides a structured workflow for auditing and refining the "OpenClaw: The Universal Personal AI Assistant Platform" NotebookLM workspace.
OpenClaw is a Universal Personal AI Assistant Platform. Its NotebookLM workspace is organized into a main notebook (master index) and 4 specialized sub-notebooks covering distinct functional areas. The goal of this skill is to ensure each notebook is a high-signal, low-noise knowledge base that functions as a specialized expert on its domain.
Notebook Map
| Notebook | Focus | Priority Mode |
|---|
| Main | "OpenClaw: The Universal Personal AI Assistant Platform" — Master Index | Reference only |
| Notebook A | Core Architecture & Systems | Reliability (stable docs, specs, ADRs) |
| Notebook B | Plugins & Integrations | Deep Research (breadth, compatibility) |
| Notebook C | Education & Media | Reliability (accuracy, freshness) |
| Notebook D | Developer Tools | Deep Research (APIs, SDKs, CLI tools) |
For detailed sub-notebook personas, source criteria, and test queries, see references/sub-notebooks.md.
Operational Workflow
Phase 1: Reconnaissance
- Use
notebook_list to confirm all 5 notebooks are present (Main + A, B, C, D).
- For the target notebook(s), call
source_list to get all sources with metadata (wordCount, tokenCount, title, URL).
- Read the current
configure_chat instructions via notebook_get to understand the existing persona.
- Ask the user which notebook(s) to audit if not specified (default: all 4 sub-notebooks).
Phase 2: Diagnosis — Pruning Criteria
Apply these criteria to every source. Flag sources that meet one or more:
| Category | Criterion | Action |
|---|
| Duplicate | Same content from multiple URLs or near-identical wordCount + title | Delete all but the most complete version |
| Obsolete | Content dated >12 months unless it is a foundational spec/ADR | Flag for user confirmation before delete |
| Off-topic | Content not related to the notebook's declared scope (see Notebook Map) | Delete |
| Low-value | Thin content (<500 words), marketing fluff, or pure promotional pages | Delete |
| Redundant | A summary article that is already covered in full by a primary source | Delete the summary, keep the primary |
Threshold: If content overlap > 80% between two sources, keep only the most complete/authoritative one.
Phase 3: Planning
Generate a prioritized action list before executing any changes:
- List sources to DELETE with reason.
- List sources to ADD to fill identified gaps.
- List changes to configure_chat (persona update).
- List notes to create as permanent anchors inside the notebook.
Present the plan to the user and get confirmation before Phase 4.
Phase 4: Execution with Checkpoint
- Checkpoint: Record the full source list and a baseline query response (
notebook_query) before any changes.
- Apply deletions via
source_delete (confirmed sources only).
- Apply additions via
source_add or notebook_add_url / notebook_add_text.
- Update persona via
configure_chat using the target template from references/sub-notebooks.md.
- Create anchor notes via
note_create if needed.
- If quality degrades, restore from checkpoint.
Phase 5: Validation
Run the validation queries from references/sub-notebooks.md for the target notebook. Evaluate:
- Context Relevance: Does the answer use only on-topic sources?
- Coverage: Does the answer reference diverse sources (not just 1-2)?
- Faithfulness: Are claims traceable to actual source content?
- Anti-hallucination: Does the notebook refuse off-topic queries correctly?
Stop when all 3 test queries return high-quality, on-topic answers.
Global Principles
- Less is more: A notebook with 15 excellent sources outperforms one with 50 mediocre ones.
- Scope discipline: Each sub-notebook must refuse to answer questions outside its declared scope.
- Never delete without checkpoint: Always capture state before destructive operations.
- User confirmation required for: deleting sources older than 12 months, deleting >5 sources at once, or any source the user marked as important.
