| name | opener-variator |
| description | Rewrite subsection openers so they stop reading like a generated table-of-contents: remove \"overview/narration\" stems and reduce repeated opener cadences across H3s.
**Trigger**: opener variator, opener rewrite, rewrite openers, overview opener, 开头改写, 小节开头, 去overview, 去旁白.
**Use when**: `writer-selfloop` is PASS but flags repeated opener stems / overview narration in `output/WRITER_SELFLOOP_TODO.md`, or the draft still has a subtle “generator cadence”.
**Skip if**: you are pre-C2 (NO PROSE), or the section is evidence-thin (route upstream; don’t stylize filler).
**Network**: none.
**Guardrail**: do not invent facts; do not add/remove/move citation keys; do not move citations across subsections; keep meaning intact.
|
Opener Variator (H3 first paragraph rewrite)
Purpose: fix a high-signal automation tell that survives structural gates:
- many H3s begin with the same rhetorical shape
- "overview" narration replaces content-bearing framing
This skill is intentionally narrow:
- only rewrite the first paragraph (or first 2–4 sentences) of the flagged H3 files
- keep the argument moves and citations intact
Inputs
Required:
output/WRITER_SELFLOOP_TODO.md (Style Smells section)- the referenced
sections/S<sub_id>.md files
Optional (helps you stay aligned):
outline/writer_context_packs.jsonl (use opener_mode, tension_statement, thesis)
Outputs
Note: keep this as an openers-last pass. Run it after paragraph-curator so you do not keep rewriting paragraph 1 while the body is still changing.
- Updated
sections/S<sub_id>.md files (still body-only; no headings)
Workflow (route from the self-loop report)
- Open
output/WRITER_SELFLOOP_TODO.md and locate ## Style Smells.
- Treat the flagged
sections/S*.md list as the only scope for this pass.
- For each flagged file:
- Optional: look up its entry in
outline/writer_context_packs.jsonl and read opener_mode / tension_statement / thesis to stay aligned.
- Rewrite only the opener paragraph (or first 2-4 sentences). Preserve meaning and citation keys.
- Best-of-3 opener sampling (recommended): draft 2-3 candidate opener paragraphs (different opener modes), then keep the one that is most content-bearing and least repetitive across H3s.
- Rerun
writer-selfloop and confirm the Style Smells list shrinks.
Role prompt: Opener Editor (paper voice)
You are rewriting the opening paragraph of a survey subsection.
Goal:
- replace narration/overview openers with a content-bearing framing
- vary opener cadence across subsections so the paper reads authored
Constraints:
- do not invent facts
- do not add/remove/move citation keys
- do not change the subsection’s thesis
Checklist:
- sentence 1 is content-bearing (tension/decision/failure/protocol/contrast), not “what we do in this section”
- paragraph 1 ends with a clear thesis/takeaway
- no slide navigation (“Next, we…”, “In this subsection…”, “This section provides an overview…“)
What to delete (high-signal narration)
Rewrite immediately if the opener contains any of:
- “This section/subsection provides an overview …”
- “In this section/subsection, we …”
- “This subsection surveys/argues …”
- “Next, we move/turn …”
- repeated opener labels (“Key takeaway:” spam)
What to replace with (opener moves)
Pick one opener mode per H3 (the writer pack may suggest opener_mode).
Do not copy labels; write as natural prose.
Allowed opener moves (choose 1; keep it concrete):
- Tension-first: state the real trade-off; why it matters; end with thesis.
- Decision-first: frame the builder’s choice under constraints; end with thesis.
- Failure-first: start from a failure mode that motivates the lens; end with thesis.
- Protocol-first: start from comparability constraints (budget/tool access); end with thesis.
- Contrast-first: open with an A-vs-B sentence, then explain why; end with thesis.
- Lens-first: state the chapter lens and narrow to this subsection’s question.
Mini examples (paraphrase; do not copy)
Bad (overview narration):
This subsection provides an overview of tool interfaces for agents.
Better (content-bearing):
Tool interfaces define what actions are executable; interface contracts therefore determine which evaluation claims transfer across environments.
Bad (process narration):
In this subsection, we discuss memory mechanisms and then review retrieval methods.
Better (tension-first):
Memory improves long-horizon coherence, but it also expands the failure surface: retrieval can be stale, wrong, or adversarial, and agents rarely know which.
Done checklist
