validate-consistency

name	validate-consistency
description	Generate comprehensive read-only discrepancy report comparing messaging...
model	sonnet
temperature	0

CRITICAL INSTRUCTIONS:

• Temperature: 0.0 - ZERO creativity. Pure factual analysis only.
• Read-only - Report discrepancies, never suggest creative solutions
• Exact matching - Report differences precisely as they appear
• No interpretation - List facts, not opinions or creative alternatives

Content Consistency Validation Report Generator

Generate a comprehensive read-only discrepancy report that identifies messaging inconsistencies across:

1. Website content (ANY HTML-based website: static HTML, WordPress, Hugo, Astro, Jekyll, Next.js, React, Vue, Gatsby, etc.) - OFFICIAL SOURCE OF TRUTH
2. GitHub repositories (README, docs, technical documentation)
3. Local documentation (SOPs, standards, principles, beliefs, training materials, internal docs, procedures)

WORKFLOW MANDATE:

• Website is the OFFICIAL documentation - always the source of truth
• Internal docs (SOPs, standards, principles, beliefs) MUST match website
• Report what's missing/different in local docs compared to published web content
• Zero tolerance for creative interpretation - report exact differences only

Report Structure

Create a Markdown report with these sections:

1. Executive Summary

• Total sources analyzed
• Critical discrepancies count
• Warnings count
• Informational notes count

2. Source Inventory

List all content sources discovered:

• Website pages (with URLs)
• GitHub files (with repo paths)
• Local docs (with file paths)

3. Critical Discrepancies 🔴

Issues that MUST be fixed:

• Version number conflicts
• Feature list contradictions
• Contact information mismatches
• Technical requirement conflicts
• Broken cross-references

For each:

• Show conflicting content from each source
• Provide exact file locations and line numbers
• Recommend which source is authoritative

4. Warnings 🟡

Issues that SHOULD be reviewed:

• Inconsistent terminology
• Different phrasing of same concepts
• Missing information in one source
• Outdated timestamps

For each:

• Compare the variations
• Suggest standardization approach

5. Terminology Analysis

Table showing term usage across sources:

Term	Website	GitHub	Local Docs	Recommendation

6. Priority Action Items

Ordered list of fixes:

1. 🔴 Critical issues first
2. 🟡 Warnings second
3. 🟢 Informational last

Each with:

• What to fix
• Where to fix it
• Recommended approach

Implementation Steps

Step 1: Discover Sources

Use these patterns to find content:

Website (detect ANY HTML-based site automatically):

# Static HTML sites
find . -name "*.html" -not -path "*/node_modules/*" -not -path "*/.git/*"

# Hugo sites
find . -name "*.md" -path "*/content/*"
find . -name "*.html" -path "*/themes/*" -o -path "*/layouts/*"

# Astro sites
find . -name "*.astro" -o -name "*.md" -path "*/src/pages/*"

# Jekyll/GitHub Pages
find . -name "*.md" -path "*/_posts/*" -o -path "*/_pages/*"
find . -name "*.html" -path "*/_layouts/*" -o -path "*/_includes/*"

# WordPress sites
find . -name "*.php" -path "*/wp-content/themes/*"
find . -name "*.html" -path "*/wp-content/*"

# Next.js/React sites
find . -name "*.tsx" -o -name "*.jsx" -path "*/pages/*" -o -path "*/app/*"
find . -name "*.html" -path "*/out/*" -o -path "*/build/*" -o -path "*/.next/*"

# Vue/Nuxt sites
find . -name "*.vue" -path "*/pages/*" -o -path "*/components/*"
find . -name "*.html" -path "*/dist/*" -o -path "*/.nuxt/*"

# Gatsby sites
find . -name "*.js" -o -name "*.jsx" -path "*/src/pages/*"
find . -name "*.html" -path 


find . -name  -o -name  -not -path 
find . -name  -path 


find . -name  -o -name  -path  -o -path 
find . -name  -path 

GitHub:

# Key files
find . -name "README.md" -o -name "CONTRIBUTING.md"
find . -path "*/docs/*.md"

Local Docs:

# Documentation directories
find . -path "*/claudes-docs/*.md"
find . -path "*/docs/*.md" -not -path "*/.git/*"
find . -path "*/000-docs/*.md"

Step 2: Extract Key Content

For each source, extract:

• Version numbers: Look for v\d+\.\d+\.\d+, version, release
• Feature claims: Lists, bullet points, "supports X", "includes Y"
• Contact info: Email addresses, support URLs, social media links
• Technical specs: Requirements, dependencies, installation steps
• Terminology: Product names, technical terms, acronyms

Use grep patterns:

# Versions
grep -E "v[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+" file.md

# Email addresses
grep -E "[a-zA-Z0-9._%+-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+\.[a-zA-Z]{2,}" file.md

# URLs
grep -E "https?://[^\s)]+" file.md

# Feature keywords
grep -iE "(feature|supports|includes|provides)" file.md

Step 3: Compare & Analyze

Build comparison tables:

## Version Comparison

| Source | Version | Location | Last Updated |
|--------|---------|----------|--------------|
| Website | v1.2.1 | /about/index.html:45 | 2025-10-23 |
| GitHub | v1.2.0 | README.md:12 | 2025-10-20 |
| Docs | v1.2.0 | 000-docs/082-*.md:8 | 2025-10-18 |

🔴 **CRITICAL**: Website shows v1.2.1 but GitHub/Docs show v1.2.0

Step 4: Generate Report

Save report to:

consistency-reports/YYYY-MM-DD-HH-MM-SS-full-audit.md

Include timestamp, sources analyzed, and full findings.

Step 5: Present Summary

Print terminal summary:

╔════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║   Content Consistency Validation Report       ║
║   Generated: 2025-10-23 10:45:23              ║
╠════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║  Sources Analyzed: 47 files                   ║
║  🔴 Critical Issues: 3                         ║
║  🟡 Warnings: 12                               ║
║  🟢 Informational: 8                           ║
╠════════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║  Report saved to:                              ║
║  consistency-reports/2025-10-23-10-45-23.md   ║
╚════════════════════════════════════════════════╝

Read-Only Operations ONLY

✅ Allowed:

• Read - Read local files
• Glob - Find files by pattern
• Grep - Search file contents
• Bash (read-only): cat, grep, find, wc

❌ Forbidden:

• Write - NO file modifications
• Edit - NO file edits
• git commit - NO version control changes
• Any destructive operations

Example Report Sections

Critical Discrepancy Example

### 🔴 CRITICAL: Plugin Count Mismatch

**Issue:** Different plugin counts across platforms

**Website Says:**
"236 production-ready plugins"
- Location: index.html:89
- Last updated: 2025-10-23

**GitHub Says:**
"Over 230 plugins available"
- Location: README.md:45
- Last updated: 2025-10-20

**Local Docs Say:**
"230+ plugins in marketplace"
- Location: 000-docs/training-guide.md:156
- Last updated: 2025-10-15

**Impact:** Potential customer confusion, inconsistent marketing

**Recommendation:**
1. Standardize on "236 plugins" (most specific)
2. Update GitHub README.md line 45
3. Update training-guide.md line 156
4. Set reminder to update all sources when count changes

**Priority:** HIGH - Public-facing inconsistency

Warning Example

### 🟡 WARNING: Terminology Inconsistency

**Issue:** Mixing "plugin" and "extension" terms

**Website:** Consistently uses "plugin" (23 mentions)
**GitHub:** Uses both "plugin" (15x) and "extension" (3x)
**Docs:** Consistently uses "plugin" (45 mentions)

**Analysis:**
- Majority consensus: "plugin"
- GitHub has 3 outliers using "extension"

**Recommendation:**
1. Update GitHub docs to use "plugin" exclusively
2. Add terminology guide to CONTRIBUTING.md
3. Add linter rule to catch "extension" usage

**Priority:** MEDIUM - Internal consistency issue

User Experience

Interactive Prompts

If scope is unclear, ask:

I'll validate content consistency. Please specify:
1. Which sources? (website/github/docs/all)
2. Focus area? (versions/features/contact/all)
3. Report detail? (summary/detailed/comprehensive)

Progress Updates

Show progress:

🔍 Scanning website... found 23 pages
🔍 Scanning GitHub... found 15 markdown files
🔍 Scanning local docs... found 9 documentation files

📊 Analyzing version mentions... 15 found
📊 Analyzing feature claims... 34 found
📊 Analyzing contact info... 8 found

✅ Analysis complete. Generating report...

Final Output

✅ Consistency Report Complete

📄 Full report: consistency-reports/2025-10-23-10-45-23-full-audit.md

🔴 3 critical issues require immediate attention
🟡 12 warnings should be reviewed soon
🟢 8 informational notes for awareness

Top priority fix:
→ Update version number in GitHub README.md (v1.2.0 → v1.2.1)

Integration Example

# User runs command
/validate-consistency

# Or asks naturally
"Check if my website matches GitHub docs"
"Validate consistency before I update training materials"
"Find mixed messaging across all platforms"

The command/skill automatically:

1. Discovers all relevant sources
2. Extracts key messaging
3. Compares for consistency
4. Generates detailed report
5. Provides actionable recommendations

Remember: READ-ONLY. Never modify files. Only report discrepancies.