vault-memory

name	vault-memory
description	Treat the Obsidian vault as operational memory, not just note storage. Focus on retrieval quality, metadata integrity, and safe consolidation.
metadata	{"version":"1.0.0","author":"openclawgotchi","capabilities":["retrieval","memory-integrity","obsidian","knowledge-recall"],"openclaw":{"emoji":"🧠","always":false}}

Vault Memory

Use this skill when the task is about remembering, recalling, organizing, deduplicating, or validating project knowledge stored in .workspace/knowledge/.

This skill is about memory quality, not visual note polish.

Goals

1. Make recall reliable.
2. Keep metadata internally consistent.
3. Preserve stable links and note identities.
4. Avoid creating duplicate notes when extending existing knowledge is better.

Mental Model

Treat the vault as four layers:

1. inbox/ - raw intake log
2. notes/ - atomic working knowledge
3. projects/ and topics/ - hub/index layer
4. frontmatter + links + tags - retrieval surface

If recall is poor, first inspect layer 4 before rewriting layer 2.

Required Invariants

Every operational note should have:

• id
• type
• note_type
• created
• source
• project
• topic
• status
• tags

And these must stay consistent:

• status must match a status/* tag if such tags are used
• project should match the linked project hub when obvious
• topic should match the linked topic hub when obvious
• filenames, titles, and links should remain stable unless there is a strong reason to rename

Retrieval-First Rules

When writing or updating notes, optimize for future retrieval:

1. Prefer explicit titles over clever titles.
2. Put canonical terms in the title or first paragraph.
3. Keep the first 2-4 lines dense with searchable meaning.
4. Preserve important domain terms from the source text.
5. If the note is about a named system, product, or workflow, mention that exact name early.
6. If the same concept appears in multiple languages, keep the original wording somewhere in the note.

Duplicate Policy

Before creating a new note:

1. Search the vault for the core entity and concept.
2. If an existing note already owns the topic, extend it instead of creating a sibling.
3. Only create a new note when the new material has a distinct purpose:
   • different artifact type
   • different project
   • different time-bounded report
   • different decision or workflow

What This Skill Should Encourage

• extending an existing note over creating near-duplicates
• fixing metadata drift before large cleanup passes
• validating retrieval assumptions with targeted searches
• keeping raw source excerpts when they improve multilingual recall

What This Skill Should Avoid

• mass rewrites without an audit step
• changing filenames casually
• flattening everything into tags only
• relying on visual formatting as a substitute for searchable structure
• deleting notes when archiving or merging is safer

Recommended Workflow

1. Audit:

   • run a vault integrity check
   • inspect status/tag/project/topic mismatches
   • inspect likely duplicates

2. Recall test:

   • run retrieval debug queries for real user phrasings
   • verify which notes actually surface

3. Repair:

   • fix metadata invariants
   • merge or archive duplicates cautiously
   • add missing linking or canonical terms where needed

4. Consolidate:

   • only after audit + recall results are understood

Local Helper Tools

Use these scripts when available:

• python3 scripts/vault_audit.py
• python3 scripts/vault_recall.py "query"

The audit script is for integrity and duplicate signals. The recall script is for testing whether real user phrasing can find the right notes.