Skip to main content

do-work

Execute a unit of work end-to-end: understand, implement, validate with typecheck and build, then commit. Use when the user wants to do work, build a feature, fix a bug, or implement an issue or phase from a plan. Do NOT use for design-system skill extraction — that flow has its own meta-skill (extract-ds-skill).

Quellinformationen

Repository
vercel-labs/ds-skill-extraction-workshop
Letzte Quellaktivität
17. Juni 2026 um 09:04
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
10
Forks
2

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
do-work
description
Execute a unit of work end-to-end: understand, implement, validate with typecheck and build, then commit. Use when the user wants to do work, build a feature, fix a bug, or implement an issue or phase from a plan. Do NOT use for design-system skill extraction — that flow has its own meta-skill (extract-ds-skill).
# Do Work Execute a complete unit of work: understand it, build it, validate it, commit it. ## Workflow ### 1. Understand the task Read any referenced plan, PRD, or GitHub issue body in full. Explore the codebase to understand the relevant files, patterns, and conventions. If the task touches a design system surfaced under `.claude/skills/ds/`, that skill's `SKILL.md` is the source of truth for component selection, token usage, and wiring rules — read it before writing code. If the task is ambiguous, ask the user to clarify scope before proceeding. Do not guess at scope. ### 2. Plan the implementation (optional) Skip when the task is already fully specified end-to-end (e.g., a locked-down issue body). Plan when scope is open, when you have multiple viable approaches, or when the task spans more than a couple of files. ### 3. Implement This is a frontend-only workshop — implement directly. No TDD scaffolding. Edit code directly. Do not delegate via subagents unless the task genuinely splits into independent parallel pieces. ### 4. Validate Run: ``` pnpm verify ``` This runs `pnpm typecheck && pnpm build`. Fix any failures and re-run until both pass cleanly. Husky's pre-commit hook also runs `pnpm typecheck` as a backstop — but the build check lives here. Do not rely on the hook to catch build failures, and do not commit without `pnpm verify` passing. If a pre-existing failure outside the scope of this task blocks you, make the minimal fix to unblock and call it out explicitly in the commit message under a "Pre-existing fix" section. Never bypass the hook with `--no-verify`. ### 5. Commit Once `pnpm verify` passes, commit the work in ONE commit. Use the project's commit message style — read `git log --oneline -n 10` if unsure. If the task originated from a GitHub issue, close the issue with a one-line outcome: ``` gh issue close <N> --comment "<one-line outcome of what shipped>" ``` If the task only partially resolves the issue, comment on it instead of closing: ``` gh issue comment <N> --body "<what was done, what remains>" ``` **Override:** if the prompt or issue body explicitly says the issue is a shared spec (workshop, template, recurring fixture), do NOT close or comment — stop after the commit. The issue stays open for the next runner.
Auf GitHub ansehen