| name | research-wiki |
| description | Persistent research knowledge base that accumulates papers, ideas, experiments, claims, and their relationships across the entire research lifecycle. Inspired by Karpathy's LLM Wiki pattern. Use when user says "知识库", "research wiki", "add paper", "wiki query", "查知识库", or wants to build/query a persistent field map. |
| argument-hint | [subcommand: init|ingest|sync|query|update|lint|stats] |
| allowed-tools | Bash(*), Read, Write, Edit, Grep, Glob, WebSearch, WebFetch, mcp__codex__codex, mcp__codex__codex-reply |
Research Wiki: Persistent Research Knowledge Base
Subcommand: $ARGUMENTS
Overview
The research wiki is a persistent, per-project knowledge base that accumulates structured knowledge across the entire ARIS research lifecycle. Unlike one-off literature surveys that are used and forgotten, the wiki compounds — every paper read, idea tested, experiment run, and review received makes the wiki smarter.
Inspired by Karpathy's LLM Wiki pattern: compile knowledge once, keep it current, don't re-derive on every query.
Core Concepts
Four Entity Types
| Entity | Directory | Node ID format | What it represents |
|---|
| Paper | papers/ | paper:<slug> | A published or preprint research paper |
| Idea | ideas/ | idea:<id> | A research idea (proposed, tested, or failed) |
| Experiment | experiments/ | exp:<id> | A concrete experiment run with results |
| Claim | claims/ | claim:<id> | A theorem/headline with an honest PROOF status — born via /proof-checker (see Hook 4) |
Typed Relationships (graph/edges.jsonl)
| Edge type | From → To | Meaning |
|---|
extends | paper → paper | Builds on prior work |
contradicts | paper → paper | Disagrees with results/claims |
addresses_gap | paper|idea → gap | Targets a known field gap |
inspired_by | idea → paper | Idea sourced from this paper |
tested_by | idea|claim → exp | Tested in this experiment |
supports | exp → claim|idea | Experiment confirms claim |
invalidates | exp → claim|idea | Experiment disproves claim |
supersedes | paper → paper | Newer work replaces older |
Edges are stored in graph/edges.jsonl only. The ## Connections section on each page is auto-generated from the graph — never hand-edit it.
Capture hygiene (anti-self-poisoning)
Before persisting an idea / claim / experiment note, screen it for
operational noise that would harden into a self-cited falsehood (see
shared-references/capture-antipatterns.md).
Resolve the helper via the canonical chain (integration-contract §2):
.aris/tools/capture_filter.py → tools/capture_filter.py →
$ARIS_REPO/tools/capture_filter.py (warn-and-skip if unresolved). Run
python3 <capture_filter> - on the note text; if it flags env-failure /
transient-error / negative-tool-claim, do NOT store it as a durable node —
rewrite it to the fix / missing config / workaround, or drop it. Never store
"codex/gemini/the reviewer can't do X" — that gets loaded into every future
session and cited against the agent long after the real cause is gone. (The wiki's
"failed ideas → anti-repeat memory" is the GOOD inverse: a class-level research
finding, not operational noise.)
Wiki Directory Structure
research-wiki/
index.md # categorical index (auto-generated)
log.md # append-only timeline
gap_map.md # field gaps with stable IDs (G1, G2, ...)
query_pack.md # compressed summary for /idea-creator (auto-generated, max 8000 chars)
papers/
<slug>.md # one page per paper
ideas/
<idea_id>.md # one page per idea
experiments/
<exp_id>.md # one page per experiment
claims/
<claim_id>.md # one page per testable claim
graph/
edges.jsonl # materialized current relationship graph
Subcommands
Helper resolution (run before any subcommand below)
All wiki operations except plain directory bootstrap go through a single
canonical helper, tools/research_wiki.py. Skills that touch the wiki
must resolve $WIKI_SCRIPT via the chain below — never hard-code
python3 tools/research_wiki.py …. Hard-coding silently fails when
the project does not have tools/ on disk (the post-install_aris.sh
default), which is exactly the failure mode that left a real user's
research-wiki/ empty for a week.
cd "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)" || exit 1
ARIS_REPO="${ARIS_REPO:-$(awk -F'\t' '$1=="repo_root"{print $2; exit}' .aris/installed-skills.txt 2>/dev/null)}"
if [ -z "${ARIS_REPO:-}" ] && [ -f "$HOME/.aris/repo" ]; then
ARIS_REPO=$(cat "$HOME/.aris/repo" 2>/dev/null) || true
fi
WIKI_SCRIPT=".aris/tools/research_wiki.py"
[ -f "$WIKI_SCRIPT" ] || WIKI_SCRIPT="tools/research_wiki.py"
[ -f "$WIKI_SCRIPT" ] || { [ -n "${ARIS_REPO:-}" ] && WIKI_SCRIPT="$ARIS_REPO/tools/research_wiki.py"; }
[ -f "$WIKI_SCRIPT" ] || {
echo "ERROR: research_wiki.py not found at .aris/tools/, tools/, \$ARIS_REPO/tools/, or via ~/.aris/repo." >&2
echo " Fix one of:" >&2
echo " 1. run 'bash install.sh' at the pack root (writes ~/.aris/repo)" >&2
echo " 2. export ARIS_REPO=<path-to-pack-root>" >&2
echo " 3. cp <pack-root>/tools/research_wiki.py tools/" >&2
exit 1
}
本整合包适配：本包 tools/research_wiki.py 已收录（上游 ARIS 原实现，
MIT；子命令为 init/slug/add_edge/rebuild_query_pack/rebuild_index/stats/log/ ingest_paper/add_claim/upsert_idea/add_experiment/sync——本文件中的
/research-wiki update 与 lint 是 agent 执行的 skill 动作，改动落盘后用
rebuild_query_pack/rebuild_index 同步），在包根执行 bash install.sh 写入
~/.aris/repo 后解析链即可命中。仅当解析链仍未命中（未安装且未设 ARIS_REPO）
时才降级为直接按本文件前述目录结构手工读写 research-wiki/ 下的 markdown 与
graph/edges.jsonl，并在 wiki 根目录的 README.md（或首次创建时新建）记录
一行 helper-degraded: manual maintenance。
/research-wiki itself is the wiki tool — if the helper is missing it
hard-fails the scripted path and falls back to the manual-maintenance
degradation above (never silently pretend the helper ran). Caller skills that update the wiki as a side
effect (/idea-creator, /result-to-claim, /research-lit, /arxiv,
/alphaxiv, /deepxiv, /semantic-scholar, /exa-search) use the
same chain but warn-and-skip instead of hard-failing — their
primary output (idea list, claim verdict, paper summary) must still be
delivered to the user.
/research-wiki init
Initialize the wiki for the current project. After resolving
$WIKI_SCRIPT per the chain above:
python3 "$WIKI_SCRIPT" init research-wiki/
The helper creates research-wiki/{papers,ideas,experiments,claims,graph}/
plus index.md, log.md, gap_map.md, query_pack.md, and
graph/edges.jsonl, then appends "Wiki initialized" to log.md.
(Earlier versions of this skill described a prose-only init that
omitted query_pack.md — that drifted from the helper and made
/idea-creator's Phase 0 query-pack check fall through to a
rebuild_query_pack invocation that, under the old hard-coded path,
silently failed. Delegating init to the helper is the single source of
truth for the wiki schema.)
/research-wiki ingest "<paper title>" — arxiv: <id>
Add a paper to the wiki. This subcommand is thin wrapping around
python3 "$WIKI_SCRIPT" ingest_paper …, which is the single
implementation of paper ingest in ARIS (per
shared-references/integration-contract.md
— one helper, no copies). The helper does all of:
- Fetch metadata — queries the arXiv Atom API when
--arxiv-id is given
- Generate slug —
<first_author_last_name><year>_<keyword>
- Check dedup — skip an existing page unless
--update-on-exist
- Create page —
papers/<slug>.md with the schema below
- Rebuild
index.md and query_pack.md
- Append
log.md
Edge extraction (step 5/8 in the old manual flow) is not in
ingest_paper; do it as a follow-up with add_edge per relationship
identified:
python3 "$WIKI_SCRIPT" ingest_paper research-wiki/ \
--arxiv-id 2501.12345 --thesis "One-line claim from abstract."
python3 "$WIKI_SCRIPT" ingest_paper research-wiki/ \
--title "Attention Is All You Need" \
--authors "Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, …" --year 2017 --venue "NeurIPS"
python3 "$WIKI_SCRIPT" add_edge research-wiki/ \
--from "paper:vaswani2017_attention_all_you" \
--to "paper:chen2025_factorized_gap" \
--type "extends" --evidence "Section 3.2: adapts the encoder block …"
Other skills (/research-lit, /arxiv, /alphaxiv, /deepxiv,
/semantic-scholar, /exa-search) call the same helper directly in
their own last step — they don't re-route through /research-wiki ingest as a subcommand, so they don't need an LLM roundtrip.
/research-wiki sync — arxiv-ids <id1>,<id2>,...
Batch backfill: ingest one or more arXiv IDs that were read earlier
without being ingested (e.g., because research-wiki/ was set up after
the reading happened, or a hook didn't fire).
python3 "$WIKI_SCRIPT" sync research-wiki/ \
--arxiv-ids 2310.06770,1706.03762
python3 "$WIKI_SCRIPT" sync research-wiki/ --from-file ids.txt
Dedup is handled per-id; already-ingested papers are skipped silently.
This is the recommended manual repair step (see integration
contract §5 Backfill). sync does not scan session traces — callers
declare the ids explicitly.
Paper page schema (exactly what ingest_paper emits — do not
handwrite alternative fields; lint will flag drift):
---
type: paper
node_id: paper:<slug>
title: "<full title>"
authors: ["First A. Author", "Second B. Author"]
year: 2025
venue: "arXiv"
external_ids:
arxiv: "2501.12345"
doi: null
s2: null
tags: ["tag1", "tag2"]
added: 2026-04-07T10:12:00Z
---
# <full title>
## One-line thesis
[Single sentence capturing the paper's core contribution]
## Problem / Gap
## Method
## Key Results
## Assumptions
## Limitations / Failure Modes
## Reusable Ingredients
[Techniques, datasets, or insights that could be repurposed]
## Open Questions
## Claims
[Reference claim pages: claim:C1, claim:C2, etc.]
## Connections
[AUTO-GENERATED from graph/edges.jsonl — do not edit manually]
## Relevance to This Project
[Why this paper matters for our specific research direction]
Additionally, when the paper was ingested via --arxiv-id and the arXiv
API returned an abstract, the helper appends an ## Abstract (original)
section after Relevance to This Project containing the raw abstract
text as a blockquote. Manual ingests (no --arxiv-id) do not include
this section.
/research-wiki query "<topic>"
Generate query_pack.md — a compressed, context-window-friendly summary:
Fixed budget (max 8000 chars / ~2000 tokens):
| Section | Budget | Content |
|---|
| Project direction | full sections | Structured extraction from RESEARCH_BRIEF.md by ## heading (Problem / Constraints / Direction / Background / Non-Goals / Domain Knowledge / Existing Results), in priority order. No per-field char cap — the 8000-char assembly loop is the only safety net. Falls back to a flat 600-char slice if the brief uses no known headings. |
| Top 5 gaps | 1200 chars | From gap_map.md, ranked by: unresolved + linked ideas + failed experiments |
| Paper clusters | 1600 chars | 3-5 clusters by tag overlap, 2-3 sentences each |
| Failed ideas | 1400 chars | Always included — highest anti-repetition value |
| Top papers | 1800 chars | 8-12 pages ranked by: linked gaps, linked ideas, centrality, relevance flag |
| Active chains | 900 chars | limitation → opportunity relationship chains |
| Open unknowns | 500 chars | Unresolved questions across the wiki |
Pruning priority (when over budget): low-ranked papers > cluster detail > chain detail. Never prune failed ideas or top gaps first.
Key rule: Read from short fields only (frontmatter, one-line thesis, gap summary, failure note). Do not summarize full page bodies every time.
/research-wiki update <node_id> — <field>: <value>
Update a specific entity:
/research-wiki update paper:chen2025 — relevance: core
/research-wiki update idea:001 — outcome: negative
/research-wiki update claim:C1 — status: refuted
After any update: rebuild query_pack.md, update log.md.
/research-wiki lint
Health check the wiki:
- Orphan pages — entities with zero edges
- Stale claims — claims still
status: drafted or status: unproven older than 14 days
- Contradictions — claims with both
supports and invalidates edges
- Missing connections — papers sharing 2+ tags but no explicit relationship
- Dead ideas —
stage: proposed ideas that were never tested
- Sparse pages — pages with 3+ empty sections
Output a LINT_REPORT.md with suggested fixes.
/research-wiki stats
Quick overview:
📚 Research Wiki Stats
Papers: 28 (12 core, 10 related, 6 peripheral)
Ideas: 7 (2 active, 3 failed, 1 partial, 1 succeeded)
Experiments: 12
Claims: 15 (8 verified, 4 unproven, 2 refuted, 1 sound-modulo-imports)
Edges: 64
Gaps: 8 (3 unresolved)
Last updated: 2026-04-07T10:12:00Z
Integration with Existing Workflows
All paper-reading skills follow the same integration contract (see
shared-references/integration-contract.md):
- single predicate —
[ -d research-wiki/ ]
- single canonical helper —
python3 "$WIKI_SCRIPT" ingest_paper … after resolving $WIKI_SCRIPT via the chain at the top of this SKILL
- concrete artifact —
papers/<slug>.md + log.md entry
- backfill —
sync --arxiv-ids …
- diagnostic —
verify_wiki_coverage.sh (Policy E; resolved per integration-contract §2)
Hook 1: After /research-lit finds papers
# At end of research-lit, after synthesis:
if research-wiki/ exists AND $WIKI_SCRIPT resolved (chain at top of this SKILL):
for paper in top_relevant_papers (limit 8-12):
python3 "$WIKI_SCRIPT" ingest_paper research-wiki/ \
--arxiv-id <id> [--thesis "..."] [--tags "..."]
for each explicit relation to existing wiki paper:
python3 "$WIKI_SCRIPT" add_edge research-wiki/ \
--from "paper:<slug>" --to "<target>" \
--type <extends|contradicts|addresses_gap|...> \
--evidence "..."
log "research-lit ingested N papers"
elif research-wiki/ exists but $WIKI_SCRIPT did not resolve:
warn "wiki update skipped — research_wiki.py unreachable; run bash install.sh at the pack root"
Each paper-reading skill ships its own Step "Update Research Wiki (if
active)" that calls the same helper once per paper it touched. The
business logic is not duplicated — only the loop over that skill's
specific result set differs.
Hook 2: /idea-creator reads AND writes wiki
Before ideation:
if research-wiki/query_pack.md exists (and < 7 days old):
prepend query_pack to landscape context
treat failed ideas as banlist
treat top gaps as search seeds
still run fresh literature search for last 3-6 months
After ideation (CRITICAL — without it, ideas/ stays empty; runs on EVERY
generation, including a re-run with updated constraints): the page write is a
deterministic helper command, not a freehand step the model can skip:
for idea in all_generated_ideas (recommended + killed):
python3 "$WIKI_SCRIPT" upsert_idea research-wiki/ \
--slug <stable-id> --title <title> --stage <proposed|archived> --outcome pending \
--thesis <...> --risks <...> --based-on <paper:slug,...> --target-gaps <G2,...>
# one call: writes ideas/<slug>.md, wires inspired_by/addresses_gap edges,
# rebuilds index + query_pack, logs. Default skip-on-exist (won't clobber an
# existing idea enriched by /result-to-claim). `outcome` ∈ {unknown, pending,
# negative, mixed, positive} — the experiment verdict is set later by
# /result-to-claim, never guessed at ideation.
log "idea-creator wrote N ideas to wiki"
Hook 3: After /result-to-claim verdict
# Create/refresh the experiment node FIRST via the deterministic helper (verdict owner
# → --update-on-exist). This is the experiment BIRTH point. add_edge does NOT verify
# node existence, so GATE the supports/invalidates edges below on the node having been
# born (EXP_NODE_OK) — else they'd dangle off a missing exp node.
EXP_NODE_OK = (python3 "$WIKI_SCRIPT" add_experiment research-wiki/ --slug <exp_id> \
--idea idea:<active_idea> --verdict <yes|partial|no> --confidence <high|medium|low> \
--metrics <...> --reasoning <...> --provenance <run dir> --update-on-exist) succeeded
# writes page + idea--tested_by-->exp edge + rebuilds index/query_pack
# Record empirical support as EDGES ONLY, and ONLY if EXP_NODE_OK — never overwrite the
# claim's `status`. A claim's `status` is the PROOF axis (verified / sound-modulo-imports
# / refuted / unproven / drafted / retracted), owned by /proof-checker (the claim birth
# point). Experiment support is a SEPARATE axis carried entirely by supports/invalidates
# edges; writing "supported"/"invalidated" into status is rejected by the validator.
if EXP_NODE_OK:
for claim_id in resolved_claims:
if verdict == "yes":
add_edge(exp_id, claim_id, "supports")
elif verdict == "partial":
add_edge(exp_id, claim_id, "supports") # partial — qualify in --evidence
else:
add_edge(exp_id, claim_id, "invalidates")
# Update idea outcome
update_idea(active_idea_id, outcome=verdict)
# If failed, record WHY for future ideation
if verdict in ("no", "partial"):
update_idea failure_notes with specific metrics and reasons
rebuild query_pack
log "result-to-claim: exp_id updated, verdict=..."
Hook 4: Claim birth — from /proof-checker (the ONLY birth point)
Wiki claim nodes are born here. /proof-checker Phase 5.5 calls add_claim
for each top-level theorem/headline after writing PROOF_AUDIT.json, stamping an
honest PROOF-axis status and a provenance pointer to the audit trace. No other
skill creates a claim node: /result-to-claim (Hook 3) only adds empirical
supports/invalidates edges to an already-born claim and never edits its status.
python3 "$WIKI_SCRIPT" add_claim research-wiki/ --slug thm-main-ub \
--name "Main upper bound" --status verified \
--provenance ".aris/traces/proof-checker/<run>/" --statement "..." --update-on-exist
Claim status ∈ {drafted, unproven, sound-modulo-imports, verified,
refuted, retracted} — the proof axis only. Empirical support is a separate
axis, carried entirely by edges (Hook 3), never written into status.
Re-ideation Trigger
After significant wiki updates, suggest re-running /idea-creator:
- ≥5 new papers ingested since last ideation
- ≥3 new failed/partial ideas since last ideation
- New contradiction discovered in the graph
- New gap identified that no existing idea addresses
The system suggests but does not auto-trigger. User decides.
Key Rules
- One source of truth for relationships:
graph/edges.jsonl. Page Connections sections are auto-generated views.
- Canonical node IDs everywhere:
paper:<slug>, idea:<id>, exp:<id>, claim:<id>, gap:<id>. Never use raw titles or inconsistent shorthands.
- Failed ideas are the most valuable memory. Never prune them from query_pack.
- query_pack.md is hard-budgeted at 8000 chars. Deterministic generation, not open-ended summarization.
- Append to log.md for every mutation. The log is the audit trail.
- Reviewer independence applies. When the wiki is read by cross-model review skills, pass file paths only — do not summarize wiki content for the reviewer.
Acknowledgements
Inspired by Karpathy's LLM Wiki — "compile knowledge once, keep it current, don't re-derive on every query."
