| name | stop-slop |
| description | Remove AI writing patterns from prose. Use when drafting, editing, or reviewing text to eliminate predictable AI tells. |
| argument-hint | [text or file] |
| license | MIT |
| metadata | {"version":"1.1.0","author":"Gaurav Tiwari"} |
Stop Slop
Eliminate predictable AI writing patterns from prose.
Core Rules
-
Cut filler phrases. Remove throat-clearing openers and emphasis crutches. See references/phrases.md.
-
Break formulaic structures. Avoid binary contrasts, dramatic fragmentation, rhetorical setups. See references/structures.md.
-
Vary rhythm. Mix sentence lengths. Two items beat three. End paragraphs differently.
-
Trust readers. State facts directly. Skip softening, justification, hand-holding.
-
Cut quotables. If it sounds like a pull-quote, rewrite it.
Quick Checks
Before delivering prose:
- Three consecutive sentences match length? Break one.
- Paragraph ends with punchy one-liner? Vary it.
- Em-dash before a reveal? Remove it.
- Explaining a metaphor? Trust it to land.
- Same concept called three different names? Pick one and repeat it.
- "Serves as" or "stands as" where "is" works? Use "is."
- Stacked "from X to Y" ranges? Pick one specific example.
- Closing paragraph could apply to any article? Make it specific.
- Caption or alt text explains how the image was made, or why it beats a stock photo? Replace it with what the image shows, or remove it.
Self-Audit (Final Pass)
After writing, ask: "What makes this obviously AI-generated?" Read every paragraph looking for:
- Synonym cycling (same thing, different words each time)
- -ing gerund clusters (highlighting, showcasing, fostering)
- Significance inflation (testament, pivotal, transformative)
- False comprehensiveness (from X to Y, whether A or B)
- Generic optimistic closing
Fix every instance found. Then read once more.
Scoring
Rate 1-10 on each dimension:
| Dimension | Question |
|---|
| Directness | Statements or announcements? |
| Rhythm | Varied or metronomic? |
| Trust | Respects reader intelligence? |
| Authenticity | Sounds human? |
| Density | Anything cuttable? |
Below 35/50: revise.
This grid is a quick self-check, not a gate. For a scored audit with severity tiers, run the sibling slop-detector skill: exact production-narration constructions fail outright, broad lexical matches only prompt review, and the advisory score (0 to 5 clean, 6 to 15 needs editing, 16+ rewrite) decides pass or fail.
Examples
See references/examples.md for before/after transformations.
License
MIT
