| name | claim-decomposition |
| description | Tactic for decomposing compound claims into atomic propositions — identify logical structure, separate conjunctions, extract implicit assumptions. |
| execution | tactic |
| used-by | claim-extraction, argument-synthesis |
Claim Decomposition
Decompose compound claims into atomic propositions that can be independently evaluated.
Minimum Yield
Must produce ≥2 atomic claims per compound claim processed.
Protocol
- Identify the logical structure of the compound claim (conjunction, disjunction, conditional, etc.)
- Separate each independent proposition into its own atomic claim
- Extract implicit assumptions that the claim relies on but doesn't state
- For each atomic claim, verify it is:
- Falsifiable (could in principle be shown wrong)
- Self-contained (understandable without the parent claim)
- Non-redundant (not restating another extracted claim)
- Create claim pages for each atomic proposition via
claim-page-creation
- Add
derived_from edges from atomic claims back to the source compound claim
SOPs Used
- claim-page-creation — create individual claim pages
- rebuttal-documentation — document counter-claims discovered during decomposition
Yield Report
Returns: { compound_claims_processed: number, atomic_claims_produced: number, implicit_assumptions_found: number }