Use when assessing task complexity, before starting complex tasks, when stuck after multiple attempts, or reviewing code against best practices. Provides quality-gates scoring (1-5), escalation workflows, and pattern library management.
Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
Use when assessing task complexity, before starting complex tasks, when stuck after multiple attempts, or reviewing code against best practices. Provides quality-gates scoring (1-5), escalation workflows, and pattern library management.
This skill teaches agents how to assess task complexity, enforce quality gates, and prevent wasted work on incomplete or poorly-defined tasks.
Key Principle: Stop and clarify before proceeding with incomplete information. Better to ask questions than to waste cycles on the wrong solution.
Overview
Auto-Activate Triggers
Receiving a new task assignment
Starting a complex feature implementation
Before allocating work in Squad mode
When requirements seem unclear or incomplete
After 3 failed attempts at the same task
When blocked by dependencies
Manual Activation
User asks for complexity assessment
Planning a multi-step project
Before committing to a timeline
Core Concepts
Complexity Scoring (1-5 Scale)
Level
Files
Lines
Time
Characteristics
1 - Trivial
1
< 50
< 30 min
No deps, no unknowns
2 - Simple
1-3
50-200
30 min - 2 hr
0-1 deps, minimal unknowns
3 - Moderate
3-10
200-500
2-8 hr
2-3 deps, some unknowns
4 - Complex
10-25
500-1500
8-24 hr
4-6 deps, significant unknowns
5 - Very Complex
25+
1500+
24+ hr
7+ deps, many unknowns
The table above is the canonical rubric. Score with max(file_count, LOC, dependency_count, unknowns), not an average: one Level 5 axis makes the task Level 5. Run scripts/assess-complexity.md or scripts/analyze-codebase.sh <target> to measure the inputs.
Blocking Thresholds
Condition
Threshold
Action
YAGNI Gate
Justified ratio > 2.0
BLOCK with simpler alternatives
YAGNI Warning
Justified ratio 1.5-2.0
WARN with simpler alternatives
Critical Questions
> 3 unanswered
BLOCK
Missing Dependencies
Any blocking
BLOCK
Failed Attempts
>= 3
BLOCK & ESCALATE
Evidence Failure
2 fix attempts
BLOCK
Complexity Overflow
Level 4-5 no plan
BLOCK
WARNING Conditions (proceed with caution):
Level 3 complexity
1-2 unanswered questions
1-2 failed attempts
The escalation protocol and gate decision logic are both in "Quick Reference" below. The YAGNI ratio, tier LOC budgets, and simpler-alternative surfacing live in rules/yagni-gate.md.
References
Load on demand with Read("${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/quality-gates/references/<file>"):
File
Content
ork-delta.md
OrchestKit-specific scars and house decisions: line-counting correctness, fail-open policy, gate self-monitoring, non-bypassable categories
unified-scoring-framework.md
Canonical 0-10 dimensions, weights, grade thresholds, improvement prioritization. Also loaded by ork:assess and ork:verify
Upstream coverage (do not restate)
This skill wraps generic quality-gate practice and keeps only the OrchestKit delta. When one of these topics comes up, go to the source instead of re-teaching it here.
Topic
Source
Complexity 1-5 rubric, per-level examples, assessment formula
"Complexity Scoring" table above, canonical
BLOCKING vs WARNING conditions, escalation protocol, attempt tracking
"Blocking Thresholds" and "Quick Reference" above, canonical
YAGNI ratio, project tier LOC budgets, simpler alternatives
Granular enough for estimation, simple enough for quick assessment
Block Threshold
3 critical questions
Prevents proceeding with too many unknowns
Escalation Trigger
3 failed attempts
Balances persistence with avoiding wasted cycles
Level 4-5 Requirement
Plan required
Complex tasks need upfront decomposition
Capability Details
complexity-scoring
Keywords: complexity, score, difficulty, estimate, sizing, 1-5 scale
Solves: How complex is this task? Score task complexity on 1-5 scale, assess implementation difficulty
blocking-thresholds
Keywords: blocking, threshold, gate, stop, escalate, cannot proceed
Solves: When should I block progress? >3 critical questions = BLOCK, Missing dependencies = BLOCK
critical-questions
Keywords: critical questions, unanswered, unknowns, clarify
Solves: What are critical questions? Count unanswered, block if >3
stuck-detection
Keywords: stuck, failed attempts, retry, 3 attempts, escalate
Solves: How do I detect when stuck? After 3 failed attempts, escalate
gate-validation
Keywords: validate, gate check, pass, fail, gate status
Solves: How do I validate quality gates? Run pre-task gate validation
pre-task-gate-check
Keywords: pre-task, before starting, can proceed
Solves: How do I check gates before starting? Assess complexity, identify blockers
complexity-breakdown
Keywords: breakdown, decompose, subtasks, split task
Solves: How do I break down complex tasks? Split Level 4-5 into Level 1-3 subtasks
requirements-completeness
Keywords: requirements, incomplete, acceptance criteria
Solves: Gate check only: is the requirement set complete enough to start? Authoring the requirements themselves belongs to ork:write-prd (see Upstream coverage)
escalation-protocol
Keywords: escalate, ask user, need help, human guidance
Solves: When and how to escalate? Escalate after 3 failed attempts
llm-as-judge
Keywords: llm as judge, g-eval, aspect scoring, quality validation
Solves: Gate thresholds only: what score must a judge return to pass? Building and running the judge belongs to ork:testing-llm (see Upstream coverage)
yagni-gate
Keywords: yagni, over-engineering, justified complexity, scope check, too complex, simplify
Solves: Is this complexity justified? Calculate justified_complexity ratio against project tier, BLOCK if > 2.0, surface simpler alternatives
