| name | goal-creator |
| description | Use when creating /goal directives, reusable testable outcome-oriented success standards for agentic workflows. Use whenever the user asks to create a goal, write a /goal directive, define what good looks like, set success criteria for an agent, define a reusable instruction, create a quality standard, write acceptance criteria for an agent workflow, or specify done conditions.
|
| metadata | {"author":"zebbern","version":"1.3"} |
/goal Creator
Create reusable, testable, outcome-oriented success standards that guide agents
across repeated runs. A /goal is not a one-off prompt - it is a durable
operating instruction that defines what good execution looks like.
Core Workflow
Creating a /goal follows these steps:
- Define the outcome - what does success look like in observable terms?
- Select category - which workflow stage is this for? (see categories below)
- Apply a template - fill in the master template or select an alternate
- Add constraints - what must NOT happen? what boundaries apply?
- Define verification - how will an independent checker confirm success?
- Run quality audit - apply the pre-flight checklist before delivering
What a /goal Is
A /goal directive is a declarative, outcome-oriented specification of what
success looks like - independent of execution path. It is:
- Enduring - reusable across multiple sessions, not one-off
- Evaluable - an independent checker can verify achievement
- Decomposable - can be broken into sub-goals with dependencies
- Role-anchored - tied to a specific agent responsibility
What a /goal Is Not
| Format | What It Specifies | /goal Difference |
|---|
| One-off prompt | A single task invocation | Durable standard, not transient |
| System instruction | How the agent should behave (identity, tone) | What the agent must achieve (outcome) |
| Checklist | Steps to execute | Success conditions to meet |
| Acceptance criteria | Verifiable conditions for one feature | Reusable standard for a class of work |
| User story | User need from product perspective | Agent responsibility from execution perspective |
| SOP | Procedural "how to" instructions | Outcome specification - "what done means" |
Rule of thumb: Use a /goal when you need a reusable success standard. Use
other formats for one-time tasks, identity definition, procedure lists, or
feature-level verification.
Master Template
Fill every /goal using this template. All fields marked * are required.
## /goal: [Short Name]
**Category**: [EXPLORE / DEFINE / PLAN / BUILD / VERIFY / DEPLOY / MONITOR / REFLECT]
**Scope**: [One-line: what this goal covers and excludes]
### Objective*
[Single declarative sentence: what success looks like in observable terms]
### Success Criteria* (verify ALL before returning)
- [Criterion 1: measurable, pass/fail verifiable condition]
- [Criterion 2: measurable, pass/fail verifiable condition]
- [Criterion 3: measurable, pass/fail verifiable condition]
### Constraints* (hard boundaries)
- MUST NOT: [forbidden action or output characteristic]
- MUST: [required characteristic every output must have]
- LIMIT: [quantified bound - time, length, count, etc.]
### Output Specification*
[Exact expected output: format, structure, required sections, naming conventions]
### Verification Method*
[How an independent checker confirms success without re-doing the work]
### Failure Modes to Prevent
- [Specific failure mode 1]: [prevention strategy]
- [Specific failure mode 2]: [prevention strategy]
### Context (optional)
[Domain assumptions, prerequisite state, related goals]
### Examples (optional)
**Good output example:** [brief illustration]
**Bad output example:** [brief illustration with why it fails]
Required Fields Reference
| Field | Purpose | Quality Bar |
|---|
| Objective | North star for the agent | Observable state, not process description |
| Success Criteria | Done checklist | Each criterion is pass/fail verifiable |
| Constraints | Guardrails | Quantified where possible, MUST NOT/MUST/LIMIT format |
| Output Specification | Delivery contract | Format + structure + required elements |
| Verification Method | Independent confirmation | Method an external checker can execute |
Category Quick Reference
Each workflow stage has a different goal category. Read the appropriate reference
file for detailed templates, examples, and stage-specific guidance.
| Category | Verb Family | Read This | Use When |
|---|
| EXPLORE | explore, investigate, research | references/categories.md | Gathering information, learning, discovering |
| DEFINE | define, scope, frame | references/categories.md | Setting boundaries, specifying requirements |
| PLAN | plan, design, architect | references/categories.md | Creating blueprints, selecting approaches |
| BUILD | implement, build, create | references/categories.md | Producing artifacts, writing code/content |
| VERIFY | verify, validate, test | references/categories.md | Checking correctness, quality assurance |
| DEPLOY | deploy, launch, release | references/categories.md | Shipping to production |
| MONITOR | monitor, maintain, improve | references/categories.md | Ongoing operations, optimization |
| REFLECT | reflect, evaluate, learn | references/categories.md | Post-hoc analysis, knowledge capture |
Gold Patterns (High-Impact)
Read references/patterns.md for full details with examples. The top 5:
- End-State-First - Define "done" in verifiable terms before describing process
- Structured Output Contract - Specify exact output format as an interface contract
- Constraint-First Safety - Define what NOT to do before what to do
- Second-Agent Test - A different agent can verify success from the output alone
- BDD-Style Verification - Use Given/When/Then for complex multi-step goals
Anti-Patterns (Avoid These)
Read references/patterns.md for the full catalog with before/after corrections.
| Anti-Pattern | Symptom | Fix |
|---|
| Vague Aspiration | "Create something good" | Add measurable criteria |
| Over-Specification | Prescribes every micro-step | Separate goal (outcome) from procedure (how) |
| Under-Specification | Missing output format | Add output contract section |
| Conflicting Signals | Multiple incompatible priorities | Explicit priority order |
| No Termination | Agent does not know when to stop | Add explicit stop conditions |
| Sycophancy Trap | Vague praise-seeking language | Replace with objective criteria |
Workflow-Specific Guidance
Read the appropriate file when targeting a specific workflow type:
| Workflow Type | Read This File |
|---|
| Website building (frontend, UI/UX) | references/workflow-guides.md |
| Software build/CI-CD | references/workflow-guides.md |
| Research and analysis | references/workflow-guides.md |
| Product development | references/workflow-guides.md |
Pre-Flight Quality Checklist
Before delivering any /goal directive, confirm ALL of the following.
Any item marked [VETO] failing blocks delivery regardless of other quality.
A. Clarity
B. Verifiability
C. Safety [VETO items - any failure blocks delivery]
D. Completeness
E. Reusability
F. Actionability
Minimum passing score: 10/12 items from sections A, B, D, E, F + ALL section C