multi-document-compare

name	multi-document-compare
description	Compare two or more existing parsed documents, pasted document texts, or document contents from chat context to identify similarities, differences, additions, deletions, modifications, conflicts, risks, version changes, and dimension-based comparisons. Use when the user asks for 多文档对比, 文档对比, 版本对比, 合同对比, 方案对比, PRD对比, 招投标文件对比, 制度新旧版本对比, 供应商方案比较, 差异点, 共同点, 冲突点, 新增删除修改, 横向比较, compare documents, document comparison, version comparison, diff, conflict clauses, or vendor comparison.
when_to_use	Use this skill only after two or more document contents are already available from pasted text, chat context, or the system document parser. Do not use it to directly read, parse, extract, OCR, or inspect uploaded PDF, Word, TXT, Markdown, scanned files, or other file bytes. If the user asks to export the comparison as Word, PDF, Markdown, or another file, produce the comparison content first and then route it to file-generator.
runtime_type	prompt
max_calls_per_turn	5
timeout_seconds	5
display	{"icon":"files","category":"document_processing","scenarios":["document_handling","knowledge_research","legal_compliance","business_operations"],"label":{"en_US":"Multi-document Compare","zh_Hans":"多文档对比"},"description":{"en_US":"Designed for comparing contracts, policies, proposals, or document versions; identifies content differences, conflicts, risks, missing items, and version changes across available documents.","zh_Hans":"适用于对比合同、制度、方案或文档版本，可识别多个已有文档之间的内容差异、冲突、风险、缺失项和版本变化。"},"when_to_use":{"en_US":"Use when two or more available document contents need comparison.","zh_Hans":"当两个或多个已有文档内容需要对比时使用。"},"tags":{"en_US":["Compare","Documents","Differences"],"zh_Hans":["对比","文档","差异"]}}

Multi-document Compare Skill

Use this skill to compare two or more available document contents. This skill performs comparison and synthesis only; it does not read files, parse file formats, OCR images, generate redlines, or create downloadable files.

Scope

Use this skill for:

• Contract version comparison and clause difference review.
• Proposal version comparison and solution change tracking.
• PRD or requirements document change comparison.
• Tender, bid, and procurement document comparison.
• Old-versus-new policy, procedure, or制度 comparison.
• Multi-vendor proposal comparison across dimensions such as price, delivery, responsibilities, timeline, risks, and functions.
• Identifying common points, differences, additions, deletions, modifications, conflicts, risks, and key version changes.

Do not use this skill to:

• Directly read, parse, extract, or inspect uploaded files or file bytes.
• Replace the system document parser.
• Produce legal, compliance, procurement, or professional review as a final authority.
• Make strong conclusions from unreadable, low-quality, incomplete, scanned, garbled, or partially parsed source content.
• Generate Word, PDF, Markdown, TXT, CSV, XLSX, or any downloadable file directly.
• Invent document content, clauses, prices, dates, responsibilities, risks, or conflicts not grounded in source text.

Routing Rules

• If two or more document contents are already available from pasted text, chat context, or the system document parser, use this skill directly.
• If the user uploads files and asks to compare them, use this skill only after the system document parser has provided structured content for at least two documents.
• If the user only asks to read, extract, parse, inspect, or preserve original document text, do not use this skill; that is a document parsing task.
• If the user says "read and compare", the system document parser must provide the source content first, then this skill compares the parsed content.
• If the user asks to export the comparison result, produce the comparison content first, then route that content to file-generator.

Workflow

1. Confirm that at least two source documents are available as text, structured parsed content, or prior chat context.
2. Identify each document's name, version, date, source label, or role when available. If labels are missing, use neutral labels such as 文档A, 文档B, and 文档C in Chinese output.
3. Identify the comparison focus: generic comparison, version changes, clause conflicts, vendor comparison, requirements changes, or policy changes.