| name | autoacad-review |
| description | Use when stress-testing a paper or experiment package for methodology-evidence consistency, reviewer objections, baseline quality, and rebuttal readiness. |
AutoAcad Review
Overview
Use this stage for adversarial review. Treat unsupported claims as critical failures, not editing suggestions.
Review Focus
- Topic discipline: does every section connect back to the core research problem?
- Method-evidence consistency: do claimed trials, tests, metrics, and baselines match the actual code and results?
- Baseline strength: were comparators tuned fairly?
- Ablation coverage: does each claimed component have an ablation?
- Length and depth: are all major sections substantial enough for a top-tier submission?
- Reviewer defense: what is the harshest plausible objection and how should the paper answer it?
Output
Produce a reviewer-style report with strengths, weaknesses, critical fabrications if any, and concrete revision actions.