Menú
De forma predeterminada está seleccionado el prompt que primero revisa el origen. Puedes cambiar a un comando directo o descargar una copia local.
Lee SKILL.md y los archivos complementarios que muestra SkillsMP antes de decidir si quieres instalarlo.
Instalar con Codex o Claude Copia este prompt, pégalo en Codex, Claude u otro asistente, y deja que revise la página de la skill y la instale por ti.
Un comando directo omite el prompt de revisión. Revisa el origen antes de ejecutarlo.
npx skills add https://github.com/aaione/everything-claude-code-zh --skill eval-harnessEl comando permanece en una sola línea. Desplázate horizontalmente para revisarlo antes de copiarlo.
¿Prefieres una copia local? Descarga los archivos que SkillsMP tiene disponibles ahora.
Kubernetes 工作负载模式、资源管理、RBAC、probes、autoscaling、ConfigMap/Secret 处理，以及面向生产级部署的 kubectl 调试。
完成任何非平凡任务后使用。智能体按 5 个维度自评输出——准确性、完整性、清晰度、可执行性、简洁性——每项都给出具体证据。生成结构化 1-5 评分卡和具体改进建议。
在 competitive-platform-analysis 产出分层竞品集合后使用。按九个加权维度（定位、声音、视觉工艺、offer packaging、证据、enterprise-readiness、thought leadership、定价、客户 strategic tension）为每个竞品评分，使用明确 1–5 rubrics 和 tension-plot。位于 competitive-report-structure 之前。
Basado en la clasificación ocupacional SOC
Mostrando SKILL.md
| name | eval-harness |
| description | Claude Code 会话的正式评估框架，实施 eval-driven development (EDD) 原则 |
| tools | Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Grep, Glob |
| origin | ECC |
Claude Code 会话的正式评估框架，实施评估驱动开发 (eval-driven development, EDD) 原则。
评估驱动开发将 evals 视为 "AI 开发的单元测试":
测试 Claude 是否能做以前不能做的事情：
[CAPABILITY EVAL: feature-name]
Task: Description of what Claude should accomplish
Success Criteria:
- [ ] Criterion 1
- [ ] Criterion 2
- [ ] Criterion 3
Expected Output: Description of expected result
确保变更不会破坏现有功能：
[REGRESSION EVAL: feature-name]
Baseline: SHA or checkpoint name
Tests:
- existing-test-1: PASS/FAIL
- existing-test-2: PASS/FAIL
- existing-test-3: PASS/FAIL
Result: X/Y passed (previously Y/Y)
使用代码进行确定性检查：
# Check if file contains expected pattern
grep -q "export function handleAuth" src/auth.ts && echo "PASS" || echo "FAIL"
# Check if tests pass
npm test -- --testPathPattern="auth" && echo "PASS" || echo "FAIL"
# Check if build succeeds
npm run build && echo "PASS" || echo "FAIL"
使用 Claude 评估开放式输出：
[MODEL GRADER PROMPT]
Evaluate the following code change:
1. Does it solve the stated problem?
2. Is it well-structured?
3. Are edge cases handled?
4. Is error handling appropriate?
Score: 1-5 (1=poor, 5=excellent)
Reasoning: [explanation]
标记以进行人工审查：
[HUMAN REVIEW REQUIRED]
Change: Description of what changed
Reason: Why human review is needed
Risk Level: LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH
"k 次尝试中至少有一次成功"
"所有 k 次试验都成功"
## EVAL DEFINITION: feature-xyz
### Capability Evals
1. Can create new user account
2. Can validate email format
3. Can hash password securely
### Regression Evals
1. Existing login still works
2. Session management unchanged
3. Logout flow intact
### Success Metrics
- pass@3 > 90% for capability evals
- pass^3 = 100% for regression evals
编写代码以通过定义的 evals。
# Run capability evals
[Run each capability eval, record PASS/FAIL]
# Run regression evals
npm test -- --testPathPattern="existing"
# Generate report
EVAL REPORT: feature-xyz
========================
Capability Evals:
create-user: PASS (pass@1)
validate-email: PASS (pass@2)
hash-password: PASS (pass@1)
Overall: 3/3 passed
Regression Evals:
login-flow: PASS
session-mgmt: PASS
logout-flow: PASS
Overall: 3/3 passed
Metrics:
pass@1: 67% (2/3)
pass@3: 100% (3/3)
Status: READY FOR REVIEW
/eval define feature-name
在 .claude/evals/feature-name.md 创建 eval 定义文件
/eval check feature-name
运行当前 evals 并报告状态
/eval report feature-name
生成完整 eval 报告
在项目中存储 evals:
.claude/
evals/
feature-xyz.md # Eval definition
feature-xyz.log # Eval run history
baseline.json # Regression baselines
## EVAL: add-authentication
### Phase 1: Define (10 min)
Capability Evals:
- [ ] User can register with email/password
- [ ] User can login with valid credentials
- [ ] Invalid credentials rejected with proper error
- [ ] Sessions persist across page reloads
- [ ] Logout clears session
Regression Evals:
- [ ] Public routes still accessible
- [ ] API responses unchanged
- [ ] Database schema compatible
### Phase 2: Implement (varies)
[Write code]
### Phase 3: Evaluate
Run: /eval check add-authentication
### Phase 4: Report
EVAL REPORT: add-authentication
==============================
Capability: 5/5 passed (pass@3: 100%)
Regression: 3/3 passed (pass^3: 100%)
Status: SHIP IT