Skip to main content

ad-community-docs

Scaffold or audit GitHub-conventional CONTRIBUTING.md and SECURITY.md without inventing maintainer policy or overwriting existing documents. Use when a maintainer needs contributor guidance, a security-reporting policy, community health files, contribution docs, or security docs.

Datos de origen

Repositorio
alexandremendoncaalvaro/agentic-development
Última actividad en el origen
25 de septiembre de 2026 a las 02:30
Idioma detectado de SKILL.md
inglés
Estrellas
2
Forks
0

Opciones de instalación

De forma predeterminada está seleccionado el prompt que primero revisa el origen. Puedes cambiar a un comando directo o descargar una copia local.

Revisa los archivos de origen

Lee SKILL.md y los archivos complementarios que muestra SkillsMP antes de decidir si quieres instalarlo.

Explorador de archivos
5 archivos

Mostrando SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instrucciones de origen · Vista previa de solo lectura
name
ad-community-docs
description
Scaffold or audit GitHub-conventional CONTRIBUTING.md and SECURITY.md without inventing maintainer policy or overwriting existing documents. Use when a maintainer needs contributor guidance, a security-reporting policy, community health files, contribution docs, or security docs.
summary
Scaffold or audit `CONTRIBUTING.md` and `SECURITY.md` without overwriting local policy.
<background_information> Creates the public collaboration documents contributors need without turning a maintainer's policy into an agent guess. `CONTRIBUTING.md` owns the contribution workflow; `SECURITY.md` owns security reporting. They are separate documents with separate audiences. </background_information> <instructions> Step 0 — detect existing policy. From the consumer repository root, run: ```bash node .agents/skills/ad-community-docs/scripts/community-doc-signals.mjs ``` If this skill loaded from a different base directory (stated at the top of the skill load), substitute it — the script lives at `scripts/community-doc-signals.mjs` inside it. Parse its JSON. Surface every `unreadable[]` entry as a blocker; an unreadable document is not absent. The detector lists conventional root, `.github/`, and `docs/` locations in `documents.contributing` and `documents.security`. When either list is non-empty, enter audit mode for that document: read it, report only concrete gaps against its purpose, and do not overwrite it. A local security policy always wins over the kit template. Step 1 — scan facts, not policy. For each missing document, inspect the root `README.md`, manifest and lockfile, test and quality-gate commands, contribution instructions, issue/PR templates, and existing `AGENTS.md` / `GUIDELINES.md`. Pre-fill only observable commands and repository conventions. Do not infer a security email address, response-time service level, supported-version window, disclosure commitment, or support channel. These belong to the maintainer. Step 2 — ask only maintainer-owned gaps. For a missing `CONTRIBUTING.md`, ask only for contributor-policy gaps the scan cannot resolve. For a missing `SECURITY.md`, ask one question at a time for the security reporting channel, supported-version policy, and disclosure expectation. An explicit `not supported`, `not configured`, or blank answer is valid. Preserve it plainly; never replace it with a made-up contact, promise, or placeholder that looks real. Step 3 — draft and confirm. Use [references/contributing-template.md](references/contributing-template.md) and [references/security-template.md](references/security-template.md). Keep the documents concise, public-facing, and separate. `CONTRIBUTING.md` points vulnerability reporters to `SECURITY.md`; it never accepts security reports through public issues. Show the completed draft and write only after user confirmation. Write new documents at the repository root unless an existing community-document convention proves another location. Never replace an existing document; offer a focused gap report instead. </instructions> <output_contract> At most one `CONTRIBUTING.md` and one `SECURITY.md`, each only when absent and explicitly confirmed. Neither file fabricates a contact, support promise, or policy. Existing files are audited, never rewritten. </output_contract> ## Next - `/ad-bootstrap` for the agent operational guide. - `/ad-guidelines` for the engineering reference. - `/ad-review` before merging the generated policy into a shared repository.
Ver en GitHub