Skip to main content

ad-community-docs

Scaffold or audit GitHub-conventional CONTRIBUTING.md and SECURITY.md without inventing maintainer policy or overwriting existing documents. Use when a maintainer needs contributor guidance, a security-reporting policy, community health files, contribution docs, or security docs.

Quellinformationen

Repository
alexandremendoncaalvaro/agentic-development
Letzte Quellaktivität
25. September 2026 um 02:30
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
2
Forks
0

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

Datei-Explorer
5 Dateien

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
ad-community-docs
description
Scaffold or audit GitHub-conventional CONTRIBUTING.md and SECURITY.md without inventing maintainer policy or overwriting existing documents. Use when a maintainer needs contributor guidance, a security-reporting policy, community health files, contribution docs, or security docs.
summary
Scaffold or audit `CONTRIBUTING.md` and `SECURITY.md` without overwriting local policy.
<background_information> Creates the public collaboration documents contributors need without turning a maintainer's policy into an agent guess. `CONTRIBUTING.md` owns the contribution workflow; `SECURITY.md` owns security reporting. They are separate documents with separate audiences. </background_information> <instructions> Step 0 — detect existing policy. From the consumer repository root, run: ```bash node .agents/skills/ad-community-docs/scripts/community-doc-signals.mjs ``` If this skill loaded from a different base directory (stated at the top of the skill load), substitute it — the script lives at `scripts/community-doc-signals.mjs` inside it. Parse its JSON. Surface every `unreadable[]` entry as a blocker; an unreadable document is not absent. The detector lists conventional root, `.github/`, and `docs/` locations in `documents.contributing` and `documents.security`. When either list is non-empty, enter audit mode for that document: read it, report only concrete gaps against its purpose, and do not overwrite it. A local security policy always wins over the kit template. Step 1 — scan facts, not policy. For each missing document, inspect the root `README.md`, manifest and lockfile, test and quality-gate commands, contribution instructions, issue/PR templates, and existing `AGENTS.md` / `GUIDELINES.md`. Pre-fill only observable commands and repository conventions. Do not infer a security email address, response-time service level, supported-version window, disclosure commitment, or support channel. These belong to the maintainer. Step 2 — ask only maintainer-owned gaps. For a missing `CONTRIBUTING.md`, ask only for contributor-policy gaps the scan cannot resolve. For a missing `SECURITY.md`, ask one question at a time for the security reporting channel, supported-version policy, and disclosure expectation. An explicit `not supported`, `not configured`, or blank answer is valid. Preserve it plainly; never replace it with a made-up contact, promise, or placeholder that looks real. Step 3 — draft and confirm. Use [references/contributing-template.md](references/contributing-template.md) and [references/security-template.md](references/security-template.md). Keep the documents concise, public-facing, and separate. `CONTRIBUTING.md` points vulnerability reporters to `SECURITY.md`; it never accepts security reports through public issues. Show the completed draft and write only after user confirmation. Write new documents at the repository root unless an existing community-document convention proves another location. Never replace an existing document; offer a focused gap report instead. </instructions> <output_contract> At most one `CONTRIBUTING.md` and one `SECURITY.md`, each only when absent and explicitly confirmed. Neither file fabricates a contact, support promise, or policy. Existing files are audited, never rewritten. </output_contract> ## Next - `/ad-bootstrap` for the agent operational guide. - `/ad-guidelines` for the engineering reference. - `/ad-review` before merging the generated policy into a shared repository.
Auf GitHub ansehen