Skip to main content

cursorqb-implementer

Use for gated CursorQB Step 4 implementation when an audited plan has READY or READY_WITH_WARNINGS slices and the user approved code changes.

Datos de origen

Repositorio
alicankiraz1/CursorQB
Última actividad en el origen
28 de julio de 2026 a las 01:50
Idioma detectado de SKILL.md
inglés
Estrellas
36
Forks
3

Opciones de instalación

De forma predeterminada está seleccionado el prompt que primero revisa el origen. Puedes cambiar a un comando directo o descargar una copia local.

Revisa los archivos de origen

Lee SKILL.md y los archivos complementarios que muestra SkillsMP antes de decidir si quieres instalarlo.

Explorador de archivos
2 archivos

Mostrando SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instrucciones de origen · Vista previa de solo lectura
name
cursorqb-implementer
description
Use for gated CursorQB Step 4 implementation when an audited plan has READY or READY_WITH_WARNINGS slices and the user approved code changes.
disable-model-invocation
true
# CursorQB Implementer Implement bounded, reversible slices from an audited CursorQB plan. This is the only CursorQB step that changes source code. ## Gate Run: ```bash python3 -I -S -B <plugin-root>/scripts/cursorqb_launcher.py --controller planner-validator -- --root . --mode step4 --strict ``` Stop if the audit is `BLOCKED` or any P0/P1 finding exists. READY or READY_WITH_WARNINGS with only P2/P3 may proceed while keeping warnings visible; NO_ACTION_REQUIRED dispatches no writer. ## Plan-Run Contract Bind the selected slice to the bundled deterministic Plan-Run controller and use this execution contract: - Outcome: complete one READY/READY_WITH_WARNINGS slice by default. Continue through the queue only when the invocation contains `--continuous`; select an exact contract only with `--slice <contract-id>`. - Files allowed to modify: only files required by the active implementation slice, plus `Planner-docs/Planing-Ledger.md` for concise verified-slice or stop-event summaries. - Files forbidden to modify: unrelated files, secrets, local credentials, and planning artifacts outside the active ledger update unless the slice requires a targeted plan repair. - Required sources to read: audit, index, active sub-plan, relevant ontology/ledger sections, AGENTS.md/repo instructions, and target source/test files. - Validation checkpoints: targeted validation first, then repo-level gate when targeted validation passes. - Stop gates: P0/P1 or safety finding, failing test without clear fix, missing source, unclear contradiction, credential/live approval, destructive external mutation, unrelated dirty worktree, unavailable validation without fallback, scope overflow, token/context pressure, or user stop. - Subagent policy: use subagents only when they separate exploration, implementation, and review; one writer per implementation slice. ## Procedure For the selected implementation slice: 1. Name the active phase/sub-plan and acceptance criterion. 2. Read repo instructions, audit, index, active sub-plan, and relevant ontology/ledger sections. 3. Run `git status` and stop on unrelated dirty changes. 4. Inspect files before editing. 5. Prefer a focused failing test first when practical. 6. Implement the smallest change that can satisfy the acceptance criterion. 7. Run targeted validation. 8. Run the repo-level gate when targeted validation passes. 9. Run independent specification and quality reviews, followed by security review when the controller requires it. A writer cannot supply reviewer evidence. 10. Use the Apply controller's CAS-protected `record-ledger` operation to move the current contract to implemented or verified with validation and ordered-review evidence. 11. Run final review against the post-Ledger repository digest, then finalize the slice. 12. Stop after the slice unless `--continuous` was explicitly supplied; continuous mode selects the next READY / READY_WITH_WARNINGS slice until a stop gate or empty queue. ## Optional Skills If installed/available, use Superpowers `executing-plans`, `subagent-driven-development`, `test-driven-development`, `verification-before-completion`, `review-security`, or local security review skills by scope. If they are absent, continue using the audit, active sub-plan, repo instructions, and validation commands. ## Completion Report Report files changed, acceptance criterion addressed, tests/commands run, evidence produced, ledger update, remaining risks, and next READY slice or exact blocker.
Ver en GitHub