Skip to main content

cursorqb-implementer

Use for gated CursorQB Step 4 implementation when an audited plan has READY or READY_WITH_WARNINGS slices and the user approved code changes.

Quellinformationen

Repository
alicankiraz1/CursorQB
Letzte Quellaktivität
28. Juli 2026 um 01:50
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
36
Forks
3

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

Datei-Explorer
2 Dateien

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
cursorqb-implementer
description
Use for gated CursorQB Step 4 implementation when an audited plan has READY or READY_WITH_WARNINGS slices and the user approved code changes.
disable-model-invocation
true
# CursorQB Implementer Implement bounded, reversible slices from an audited CursorQB plan. This is the only CursorQB step that changes source code. ## Gate Run: ```bash python3 -I -S -B <plugin-root>/scripts/cursorqb_launcher.py --controller planner-validator -- --root . --mode step4 --strict ``` Stop if the audit is `BLOCKED` or any P0/P1 finding exists. READY or READY_WITH_WARNINGS with only P2/P3 may proceed while keeping warnings visible; NO_ACTION_REQUIRED dispatches no writer. ## Plan-Run Contract Bind the selected slice to the bundled deterministic Plan-Run controller and use this execution contract: - Outcome: complete one READY/READY_WITH_WARNINGS slice by default. Continue through the queue only when the invocation contains `--continuous`; select an exact contract only with `--slice <contract-id>`. - Files allowed to modify: only files required by the active implementation slice, plus `Planner-docs/Planing-Ledger.md` for concise verified-slice or stop-event summaries. - Files forbidden to modify: unrelated files, secrets, local credentials, and planning artifacts outside the active ledger update unless the slice requires a targeted plan repair. - Required sources to read: audit, index, active sub-plan, relevant ontology/ledger sections, AGENTS.md/repo instructions, and target source/test files. - Validation checkpoints: targeted validation first, then repo-level gate when targeted validation passes. - Stop gates: P0/P1 or safety finding, failing test without clear fix, missing source, unclear contradiction, credential/live approval, destructive external mutation, unrelated dirty worktree, unavailable validation without fallback, scope overflow, token/context pressure, or user stop. - Subagent policy: use subagents only when they separate exploration, implementation, and review; one writer per implementation slice. ## Procedure For the selected implementation slice: 1. Name the active phase/sub-plan and acceptance criterion. 2. Read repo instructions, audit, index, active sub-plan, and relevant ontology/ledger sections. 3. Run `git status` and stop on unrelated dirty changes. 4. Inspect files before editing. 5. Prefer a focused failing test first when practical. 6. Implement the smallest change that can satisfy the acceptance criterion. 7. Run targeted validation. 8. Run the repo-level gate when targeted validation passes. 9. Run independent specification and quality reviews, followed by security review when the controller requires it. A writer cannot supply reviewer evidence. 10. Use the Apply controller's CAS-protected `record-ledger` operation to move the current contract to implemented or verified with validation and ordered-review evidence. 11. Run final review against the post-Ledger repository digest, then finalize the slice. 12. Stop after the slice unless `--continuous` was explicitly supplied; continuous mode selects the next READY / READY_WITH_WARNINGS slice until a stop gate or empty queue. ## Optional Skills If installed/available, use Superpowers `executing-plans`, `subagent-driven-development`, `test-driven-development`, `verification-before-completion`, `review-security`, or local security review skills by scope. If they are absent, continue using the audit, active sub-plan, repo instructions, and validation commands. ## Completion Report Report files changed, acceptance criterion addressed, tests/commands run, evidence produced, ledger update, remaining risks, and next READY slice or exact blocker.
Auf GitHub ansehen