Menú
De forma predeterminada está seleccionado el prompt que primero revisa el origen. Puedes cambiar a un comando directo o descargar una copia local.
Lee SKILL.md y los archivos complementarios que muestra SkillsMP antes de decidir si quieres instalarlo.
Instalar con Codex o Claude Copia este prompt, pégalo en Codex, Claude u otro asistente, y deja que revise la página de la skill y la instale por ti.
Un comando directo omite el prompt de revisión. Revisa el origen antes de ejecutarlo.
npx skills add https://github.com/andrem-sec/psc-comet --skill skill-stocktakeEl comando permanece en una sola línea. Desplázate horizontalmente para revisarlo antes de copiarlo.
¿Prefieres una copia local? Descarga los archivos que SkillsMP tiene disponibles ahora.
Basado en la clasificación ocupacional SOC
Mostrando SKILL.md
| name | skill-stocktake |
| description | Quality audit of installed skills with portfolio health dashboard |
| version | 0.1.0 |
| level | 3 |
| triggers | ["/skill-stocktake","audit skills","skill health check","review skill quality"] |
| context_files | ["context/project.md","context/learnings.md"] |
| steps | [{"name":"Mode Selection","description":"Choose Quick Scan (changed skills only) or Full Stocktake (all skills)"},{"name":"Skill Collection","description":"Gather all installed skills from .claude/skills/ directories"},{"name":"Evaluation","description":"Assess each skill against four dimensions using subagent"},{"name":"Verdict Assignment","description":"Assign one of four verdicts (Keep, Improve, Update, Retire, Merge)"},{"name":"Report Generation","description":"Generate portfolio health dashboard with findings"},{"name":"Cache Results","description":"Write results to ~/.claude/skills/skill-stocktake/results.json"}] |
Quality audit of your installed skills. Identifies skills that are outdated, redundant, or underperforming.
Without systematic skill audits, Claude:
The skill stocktake ensures your skill collection stays lean, current, and effective.
Duration: 5-10 minutes Scope: Only skills modified in the last 30 days or flagged in learnings.md Use When: Regular maintenance, after adding new skills, post-session cleanup
Process:
Duration: 20-30 minutes Scope: All skills in .claude/skills/core/ and .claude/skills/workflow/ Use When: Quarterly reviews, major version upgrades, before skill evolution
Process:
KEEP: Skill is current, actionable, unique, and effective. No changes needed.
IMPROVE: Skill has value but needs refinement. Issues might include:
UPDATE: Skill content is outdated. Triggers might include:
RETIRE: Skill provides no value or is harmful. Reasons to retire:
MERGE: Skill overlaps significantly with 1-2 other skills. Merge candidates when:
Actionability (High / Medium / Low)
Scope Fit (Right-Sized / Too Broad / Too Narrow)
Uniqueness (Unique / Overlaps / Redundant)
Currency (Current / Aging / Outdated)
When running Full Stocktake, spawn a subagent with this configuration:
subagent_type: researcher
tools: [Read, Grep, Glob]
prompt: |
Evaluate the skill at [skill-path].
Read the SKILL.md file and assess it against four dimensions:
1. Actionability: concrete, verifiable steps?
2. Scope Fit: single coherent problem, right-sized?
3. Uniqueness: overlaps with other skills?
4. Currency: uses current tools/practices?
Also read context/learnings.md and check if this skill appears in failure patterns.
Return a structured evaluation:
- Dimension scores (High/Medium/Low, etc.)
- Verdict (KEEP/IMPROVE/UPDATE/RETIRE/MERGE)
- Reasoning (2-3 sentences)
- If MERGE, list target skills
The subagent provides holistic AI judgment on subjective quality dimensions that resist simple rule-based checks.
Store stocktake results at ~/.claude/skills/skill-stocktake/results.json:
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-28T18:30:00Z",
"mode": "full",
"total_skills": 31,
"verdicts": {
"KEEP": 22,
"IMPROVE": 5,
"UPDATE": 2,
"RETIRE": 1,
"MERGE": 1
},
"skills": [
{
"name": "tdd",
"path": ".claude/skills/workflow/tdd/SKILL.md",
"verdict": "KEEP",
"actionability": "High",
"scope_fit": "Right-Sized",
"uniqueness": "Unique",
"currency": "Current",
"reasoning": "Well-defined Red-Green-Refactor phases, concrete coverage targets, no conflicts"
}
]
}
Quick Scan reads this cache to identify skills already evaluated recently.
Audit paralysis: Spending more time auditing skills than using them. Run Full Stocktake quarterly at most.
Over-retiring: Removing skills just because they're rarely used. Low-frequency high-value skills (like security-gate) should stay.
Subjective aesthetics: Retiring skills because "the writing style feels old." If the skill works and is current, keep it.
Ignoring merge recommendations: When two skills have 60%+ overlap, merging reduces context bloat and eliminates confusion about which to invoke.
Skipping the subagent: Evaluating all skills manually takes 2-3x longer and misses patterns. Use the subagent for holistic judgment.