소스 정보
- 저장소
- andrem-sec/psc-comet
- 최근 소스 활동
- 2026년 4월 1일 00:39
- 감지된 SKILL.md 언어
- 영어
- 스타
- 4
- 포크
- 0
설치 방법
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
소스 파일 검토
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
메뉴
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
직접 명령은 검토 Prompt를 거치지 않습니다. 실행하기 전에 소스를 확인하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/andrem-sec/psc-comet --skill skill-stocktake명령은 한 줄로 유지됩니다. 복사하기 전에 가로로 스크롤해 전체 내용을 확인하세요.
로컬 사본을 원하시나요? SkillsMP에서 현재 제공할 수 있는 파일을 다운로드하세요.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
SKILL.md 표시 중
| name | skill-stocktake |
| description | Quality audit of installed skills with portfolio health dashboard |
| version | 0.1.0 |
| level | 3 |
| triggers | ["/skill-stocktake","audit skills","skill health check","review skill quality"] |
| context_files | ["context/project.md","context/learnings.md"] |
| steps | [{"name":"Mode Selection","description":"Choose Quick Scan (changed skills only) or Full Stocktake (all skills)"},{"name":"Skill Collection","description":"Gather all installed skills from .claude/skills/ directories"},{"name":"Evaluation","description":"Assess each skill against four dimensions using subagent"},{"name":"Verdict Assignment","description":"Assign one of four verdicts (Keep, Improve, Update, Retire, Merge)"},{"name":"Report Generation","description":"Generate portfolio health dashboard with findings"},{"name":"Cache Results","description":"Write results to ~/.claude/skills/skill-stocktake/results.json"}] |
Quality audit of your installed skills. Identifies skills that are outdated, redundant, or underperforming.
Without systematic skill audits, Claude:
The skill stocktake ensures your skill collection stays lean, current, and effective.
Duration: 5-10 minutes Scope: Only skills modified in the last 30 days or flagged in learnings.md Use When: Regular maintenance, after adding new skills, post-session cleanup
Process:
Duration: 20-30 minutes Scope: All skills in .claude/skills/core/ and .claude/skills/workflow/ Use When: Quarterly reviews, major version upgrades, before skill evolution
Process:
KEEP: Skill is current, actionable, unique, and effective. No changes needed.
IMPROVE: Skill has value but needs refinement. Issues might include:
UPDATE: Skill content is outdated. Triggers might include:
RETIRE: Skill provides no value or is harmful. Reasons to retire:
MERGE: Skill overlaps significantly with 1-2 other skills. Merge candidates when:
Actionability (High / Medium / Low)
Scope Fit (Right-Sized / Too Broad / Too Narrow)
Uniqueness (Unique / Overlaps / Redundant)
Currency (Current / Aging / Outdated)
When running Full Stocktake, spawn a subagent with this configuration:
subagent_type: researcher
tools: [Read, Grep, Glob]
prompt: |
Evaluate the skill at [skill-path].
Read the SKILL.md file and assess it against four dimensions:
1. Actionability: concrete, verifiable steps?
2. Scope Fit: single coherent problem, right-sized?
3. Uniqueness: overlaps with other skills?
4. Currency: uses current tools/practices?
Also read context/learnings.md and check if this skill appears in failure patterns.
Return a structured evaluation:
- Dimension scores (High/Medium/Low, etc.)
- Verdict (KEEP/IMPROVE/UPDATE/RETIRE/MERGE)
- Reasoning (2-3 sentences)
- If MERGE, list target skills
The subagent provides holistic AI judgment on subjective quality dimensions that resist simple rule-based checks.
Store stocktake results at ~/.claude/skills/skill-stocktake/results.json:
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-28T18:30:00Z",
"mode": "full",
"total_skills": 31,
"verdicts": {
"KEEP": 22,
"IMPROVE": 5,
"UPDATE": 2,
"RETIRE": 1,
"MERGE": 1
},
"skills": [
{
"name": "tdd",
"path": ".claude/skills/workflow/tdd/SKILL.md",
"verdict": "KEEP",
"actionability": "High",
"scope_fit": "Right-Sized",
"uniqueness": "Unique",
"currency": "Current",
"reasoning": "Well-defined Red-Green-Refactor phases, concrete coverage targets, no conflicts"
}
]
}
Quick Scan reads this cache to identify skills already evaluated recently.
Audit paralysis: Spending more time auditing skills than using them. Run Full Stocktake quarterly at most.
Over-retiring: Removing skills just because they're rarely used. Low-frequency high-value skills (like security-gate) should stay.
Subjective aesthetics: Retiring skills because "the writing style feels old." If the skill works and is current, keep it.
Ignoring merge recommendations: When two skills have 60%+ overlap, merging reduces context bloat and eliminates confusion about which to invoke.
Skipping the subagent: Evaluating all skills manually takes 2-3x longer and misses patterns. Use the subagent for holistic judgment.