Skip to main content

refactor-plan

Create a concrete plan before starting a multi-file refactor. Use when the user asks to plan, sequence, scope, or safely execute a refactor across multiple files; always investigate first, output the plan, and wait for confirmation before making code changes.

Datos de origen

Repositorio
github/awesome-copilot
Última actividad en el origen
11 de mayo de 2026 a las 23:49
Idioma detectado de SKILL.md
inglés
Estrellas
39.498
Forks
5019

Opciones de instalación

De forma predeterminada está seleccionado el prompt que primero revisa el origen. Puedes cambiar a un comando directo o descargar una copia local.

Revisa los archivos de origen

Lee SKILL.md y los archivos complementarios que muestra SkillsMP antes de decidir si quieres instalarlo.

Mostrando SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instrucciones de origen · Vista previa de solo lectura
name
refactor-plan
description
Create a concrete plan before starting a multi-file refactor. Use when the user asks to plan, sequence, scope, or safely execute a refactor across multiple files; always investigate first, output the plan, and wait for confirmation before making code changes.
# Refactor Plan Create a detailed plan before making any code changes. ## Instructions 1. Do not edit files while preparing the plan. 2. Search the codebase to understand the current state. Read enough implementation, tests, configuration, and docs to make the plan specific to the repository. 3. Identify affected files, ownership boundaries, dependencies, and likely hidden coupling. 4. Plan changes in a safe sequence. Prefer contracts and types first, then implementations, then callers, then tests, then cleanup. 5. Include verification steps between phases and a final validation command. 6. Include rollback or recovery steps for the riskiest phases. 7. Output the complete plan using the format below. 8. Stop after the plan and ask for confirmation before implementing. If the user already asked you to implement, still produce the plan first and wait for confirmation unless they explicitly said to continue without review after the plan. If the request is too ambiguous to plan safely, ask concise clarifying questions instead of editing files. ## Output Format ```markdown ## Refactor Plan: [title] ### Current State [Brief description of how things work now] ### Target State [Brief description of how things will work after] ### Affected Files | File | Change Type | Dependencies | |------|-------------|--------------| | path | modify/create/delete | blocks X, blocked by Y | ### Execution Plan #### Phase 1: Types and Interfaces - [ ] Step 1.1: [action] in `file.ts` - [ ] Verify: [how to check it worked] #### Phase 2: Implementation - [ ] Step 2.1: [action] in `file.ts` - [ ] Verify: [how to check] #### Phase 3: Tests - [ ] Step 3.1: Update tests in `file.test.ts` - [ ] Verify: Run `npm test` #### Phase 4: Cleanup - [ ] Remove deprecated code - [ ] Update documentation ### Rollback Plan If something fails: 1. [Step to undo] 2. [Step to undo] ### Risks - [Potential issue and mitigation] ``` After the plan, ask: "Shall I proceed with Phase 1?"
Ver en GitHub