Skip to main content

refactor-plan

Create a concrete plan before starting a multi-file refactor. Use when the user asks to plan, sequence, scope, or safely execute a refactor across multiple files; always investigate first, output the plan, and wait for confirmation before making code changes.

Zur Installation springen

Quellinformationen

Repository
github/awesome-copilot
Letzte Quellaktivität
11. Mai 2026 um 23:49
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
39.255
Forks
4.987

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
refactor-plan
description
Create a concrete plan before starting a multi-file refactor. Use when the user asks to plan, sequence, scope, or safely execute a refactor across multiple files; always investigate first, output the plan, and wait for confirmation before making code changes.
# Refactor Plan Create a detailed plan before making any code changes. ## Instructions 1. Do not edit files while preparing the plan. 2. Search the codebase to understand the current state. Read enough implementation, tests, configuration, and docs to make the plan specific to the repository. 3. Identify affected files, ownership boundaries, dependencies, and likely hidden coupling. 4. Plan changes in a safe sequence. Prefer contracts and types first, then implementations, then callers, then tests, then cleanup. 5. Include verification steps between phases and a final validation command. 6. Include rollback or recovery steps for the riskiest phases. 7. Output the complete plan using the format below. 8. Stop after the plan and ask for confirmation before implementing. If the user already asked you to implement, still produce the plan first and wait for confirmation unless they explicitly said to continue without review after the plan. If the request is too ambiguous to plan safely, ask concise clarifying questions instead of editing files. ## Output Format ```markdown ## Refactor Plan: [title] ### Current State [Brief description of how things work now] ### Target State [Brief description of how things will work after] ### Affected Files | File | Change Type | Dependencies | |------|-------------|--------------| | path | modify/create/delete | blocks X, blocked by Y | ### Execution Plan #### Phase 1: Types and Interfaces - [ ] Step 1.1: [action] in `file.ts` - [ ] Verify: [how to check it worked] #### Phase 2: Implementation - [ ] Step 2.1: [action] in `file.ts` - [ ] Verify: [how to check] #### Phase 3: Tests - [ ] Step 3.1: Update tests in `file.test.ts` - [ ] Verify: Run `npm test` #### Phase 4: Cleanup - [ ] Remove deprecated code - [ ] Update documentation ### Rollback Plan If something fails: 1. [Step to undo] 2. [Step to undo] ### Risks - [Potential issue and mitigation] ``` After the plan, ask: "Shall I proceed with Phase 1?"
Auf GitHub ansehen