| name | metabolomics-analysis |
| description | ToolUniverse workflow — Metabolomics Analysis |
| source | https://github.com/mims-harvard/ToolUniverse/tree/main/skills/tooluniverse-metabolomics-analysis |
| metadata | null |
name: tooluniverse-metabolomics-analysis
description: Analyze metabolomics data including metabolite identification, quantification, pathway analysis, and metabolic flux. Processes LC-MS, GC-MS, NMR data from targeted and untargeted experiments. Performs normalization, statistical analysis, pathway enrichment, metabolite-enzyme integration, and biomarker discovery. Use when analyzing metabolomics datasets, identifying differential metabolites, studying metabolic pathways, integrating with transcriptomics/proteomics, discovering metabolic biomarkers, performing flux balance analysis, or characterizing metabolic phenotypes in disease, drug response, or physiological conditions.
Metabolomics Analysis
Comprehensive analysis of metabolomics data from metabolite identification through quantification, statistical analysis, pathway interpretation, and integration with other omics layers.
When to Use This Skill
Triggers:
- User has metabolomics data (LC-MS, GC-MS, NMR)
- Questions about metabolite abundance or concentrations
- Differential metabolite analysis requests
- Metabolic pathway analysis
- Multi-omics integration with metabolomics
- Metabolic biomarker discovery
- Flux balance analysis or metabolic modeling
- Metabolite-enzyme correlation
Example Questions This Skill Solves:
- "Analyze this LC-MS metabolomics data for differential metabolites"
- "Which metabolic pathways are dysregulated between conditions?"
- "Identify metabolite biomarkers for disease classification"
- "Correlate metabolite levels with enzyme expression"
- "Perform pathway enrichment for differential metabolites"
- "Integrate metabolomics with transcriptomics data"
- "Characterize the metabolic phenotype of this cell line"
- "Identify metabolites associated with drug response"
Core Capabilities
| Capability | Description |
|---|
| Data Import | LC-MS, GC-MS, NMR, targeted/untargeted platforms |
| Metabolite Identification | Match to HMDB, KEGG, PubChem, spectral libraries |
| Quality Control | Peak quality, blank subtraction, internal standard normalization |
| Normalization | Probabilistic quotient, total ion current, internal standards |
| Statistical Analysis | Univariate and multivariate (PCA, PLS-DA, OPLS-DA) |
| Differential Analysis | Identify significant metabolite changes |
| Pathway Enrichment | KEGG, Reactome, BioCyc metabolic pathway analysis |
| Metabolite-Enzyme Integration | Correlate with expression data |
| Flux Analysis | Metabolic flux balance analysis (FBA) |
| Biomarker Discovery | Multi-metabolite signatures |
Workflow Overview
Input: Metabolomics Data (Peak Table or Spectra)
|
v
Phase 1: Data Import & Metabolite Identification
|-- Load peak table or process raw spectra
|-- Match features to metabolite databases (HMDB, KEGG)
|-- Annotate with chemical IDs, formulas, pathways
|-- Confidence scoring for IDs
|
v
Phase 2: Quality Control & Filtering
|-- Assess peak quality (CV, blank ratios)
|-- Remove background peaks
|-- Filter low-quality metabolites
|-- Internal standard check
|
v
Phase 3: Normalization
|-- Sample-wise normalization (TIC, PQN, internal standards)
|-- Batch effect correction
|-- Log-transform or scaling
|
v
Phase 4: Exploratory Analysis
|-- PCA for sample clustering
|-- Quality assessment plots
|-- Outlier detection
|-- Sample correlation
|
v
Phase 5: Differential Analysis
|-- Statistical testing (t-test, ANOVA, Wilcoxon)
|-- Fold change calculation
|-- Multiple testing correction
|-- Volcano plots, heatmaps
|
v
Phase 6: Pathway Analysis
|-- Metabolite set enrichment (MSEA)
|-- Pathway topology analysis
|-- KEGG/Reactome pathway mapping
|-- Identify dysregulated pathways
|
v
Phase 7: Multi-Omics Integration
|-- Correlate with enzyme expression (RNA/protein)
|-- Metabolite-gene associations
|-- Pathway-level integration
|-- Metabolic flux inference
|
v
Phase 8: Generate Report
|-- Summary statistics
|-- Differential metabolites
|-- Pathway diagrams
|-- Multi-omics integration plots
|-- Biomarker panel
Phase Details
Phase 1: Data Import & Metabolite Identification
Objective: Load data and identify metabolites from features.
Supported data types:
- Peak tables: Pre-processed metabolite abundance
- Raw spectra: LC-MS (.mzML, .mzXML), GC-MS
- NMR spectra: 1D/2D NMR data
Peak table format (typical):
Sample_ID | Glucose | Lactate | Glutamine | ... | Cholesterol
----------|---------|---------|-----------|-----|------------
Control_1 | 125000 | 45000 | 78000 | ... | 23000
Control_2 | 130000 | 43000 | 82000 | ... | 25000
Disease_1 | 85000 | 92000 | 45000 | ... | 45000
Data loading:
def load_metabolomics_data(file_path, file_type='peak_table'):
"""
Load metabolomics data.
file_type options:
- 'peak_table': CSV/TSV with metabolites as columns
- 'mzml': Raw LC-MS data (requires processing)
- 'nmr': NMR spectra
"""
import pandas as pd
if file_type == 'peak_table':
data = pd.read_csv(file_path, index_col=0)
return data
elif file_type == 'mzml':
pass
Metabolite identification:
def identify_metabolites(feature_data, mass_list, rt_list=None):
"""
Match features to metabolite databases.
Uses accurate mass and retention time (if available).
Queries: HMDB, KEGG Compound, PubChem
"""
from tooluniverse import ToolUniverse
tu = ToolUniverse()
identified_metabolites = []
for i, mass in enumerate(mass_list):
hmdb_result = tu.run_one_function({
"name": "hmdb_search_by_mass",
"arguments": {
"mass": mass,
"mass_tolerance": 0.005
}
})
if hmdb_result and 'data' in hmdb_result:
matches = hmdb_result['data']
identified_metabolites.append({
'feature_id': i,
'metabolite_name': matches[0]['name'],
'hmdb_id': matches[0]['accession'],
'formula': matches[0]['chemical_formula'],
'confidence': calculate_confidence(matches[0])
})
return identified_metabolites
Confidence scoring:
Level 1: Confirmed with authentic standard (MS + RT match)
Level 2: Probable structure (accurate mass + MS/MS)
Level 3: Tentative match (accurate mass only)
Level 4: Unknown metabolite
Phase 2: Quality Control & Filtering
Objective: Remove low-quality features and background noise.
Quality control metrics:
def metabolomics_qc(data, sample_metadata):
"""
Quality control for metabolomics data.
QC metrics:
- Coefficient of variation (CV) in QC samples
- Blank ratios (signal in samples vs blanks)
- Missing values per metabolite
- Total ion current per sample
"""
qc_samples = sample_metadata['sample_type'] == 'QC'
qc_data = data[qc_samples]
cv_per_metabolite = qc_data.std() / qc_data.mean()
high_cv = cv_per_metabolite > 0.3
print(f"Metabolites with CV > 30%: {high_cv.sum()}")
blank_samples = sample_metadata['sample_type'] == 'Blank'
blank_data = data[blank_samples]
blank_means = blank_data.mean()
sample_means = data[~blank_samples & ~qc_samples].mean()
blank_ratio = sample_means / blank_means
keep_metabolites = blank_ratio > 3
missing_per_metabolite = (data == 0).sum() / data.shape[0]
keep_metabolites &= (missing_per_metabolite < 0.5)
filtered_data = data.loc[:, keep_metabolites]
return filtered_data
Phase 3: Normalization
Objective: Account for technical variation and enable fair comparison.
Normalization methods:
1. Total Ion Current (TIC):
def normalize_tic(data):
"""
Normalize by total ion current.
Assumes total metabolite abundance is similar across samples.
"""
tic = data.sum(axis=1)
median_tic = tic.median()
norm_factors = median_tic / tic
normalized = data.multiply(norm_factors, axis=0)
return normalized
2. Probabilistic Quotient Normalization (PQN):
def normalize_pqn(data, reference_sample=None):
"""
Probabilistic quotient normalization.
More robust than TIC to large metabolite changes.
"""
import numpy as np
if reference_sample is None:
reference = data.median(axis=0)
else:
reference = data.loc[reference_sample]
quotients = data.div(reference, axis=1)
norm_factors = quotients.median(axis=1)
normalized = data.div(norm_factors, axis=0)
return normalized
3. Internal Standard Normalization:
def normalize_internal_standard(data, is_metabolite):
"""
Normalize by spiked-in internal standard.
Most accurate if added before sample processing.
"""
is_abundance = data[is_metabolite]
norm_factors = is_abundance.median() / is_abundance
normalized = data.multiply(norm_factors, axis=0)
normalized = normalized.drop(columns=[is_metabolite])
return normalized
Transformation:
def transform_data(data, method='log'):
"""
Transform metabolite abundances.
Methods:
- 'log': log2 transform (stabilize variance)
- 'pareto': Pareto scaling (mean-center, divide by sqrt(std))
- 'auto': Auto-scaling (mean-center, divide by std)
"""
import numpy as np
if method == 'log':
transformed = np.log2(data + 1)
elif method == 'pareto':
mean = data.mean(axis=0)
std = data.std(axis=0)
transformed = (data - mean) / np.sqrt(std)
elif method == 'auto':
mean = data.mean(axis=0)
std = data.std(axis=0)
transformed = (data - mean) / std
return transformed
Phase 4: Exploratory Analysis
Objective: Visualize data structure and detect outliers.
PCA:
def perform_pca_metabolomics(data, sample_groups):
"""
Principal component analysis for sample clustering.
"""
from sklearn.decomposition import PCA
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
pca = PCA(n_components=2)
pca_result = pca.fit_transform(data)
plt.figure(figsize=(8, 6))
for group in sample_groups.unique():
mask = sample_groups == group
plt.scatter(pca_result[mask, 0], pca_result[mask, 1], label=group)
plt.xlabel(f'PC1 ({pca.explained_variance_ratio_[0]:.1%})')
plt.ylabel(f'PC2 ({pca.explained_variance_ratio_[1]:.1%})')
plt.legend()
plt.title('PCA - Metabolomics Data')
PLS-DA (Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis):
def plsda_analysis(X, y, n_components=2):
"""
PLS-DA for supervised dimensionality reduction.
Better separation than PCA for classification tasks.
"""
from sklearn.cross_decomposition import PLSRegression
from sklearn.preprocessing import LabelEncoder
le = LabelEncoder()
y_encoded = le.fit_transform(y)
pls = PLSRegression(n_components=n_components)
X_pls = pls.fit_transform(X, y_encoded)[0]
plt.scatter(X_pls[:, 0], X_pls[:, 1], c=y_encoded)
plt.xlabel('PLS Component 1')
plt.ylabel('PLS Component 2')
plt.title('PLS-DA')
return X_pls
Phase 5: Differential Metabolite Analysis
Objective: Identify metabolites with significant abundance changes.
Statistical testing:
def differential_metabolites(data, group1_samples, group2_samples):
"""
Identify differential metabolites between two groups.
"""
from scipy import stats
import numpy as np
results = []
for metabolite in data.columns:
group1 = data.loc[group1_samples, metabolite]
group2 = data.loc[group2_samples, metabolite]
mean1 = group1.mean()
mean2 = group2.mean()
fold_change = mean2 / mean1
log2fc = np.log2(fold_change)
t_stat, p_value = stats.ttest_ind(group1, group2, equal_var=False)
results.append({
'metabolite': metabolite,
'fold_change': fold_change,
'log2FC': log2fc,
'mean_group1': mean1,
'mean_group2': mean2,
'p_value': p_value,
't_statistic': t_stat
})
results_df = pd.DataFrame(results)
from statsmodels.stats.multitest import multipletests
results_df['adj_p_value'] = multipletests(results_df['p_value'], method='fdr_bh')[1]
results_df['significant'] = (
(results_df['adj_p_value'] < 0.05) &
(np.abs(results_df['log2FC']) > 1.0)
)
return results_df
Volcano plot:
def plot_metabolite_volcano(de_results):
"""Visualize differential metabolite results."""
plt.figure(figsize=(8, 6))
non_sig = de_results[~de_results['significant']]
plt.scatter(non_sig['log2FC'], -np.log10(non_sig['p_value']),
c='gray', alpha=0.5, s=20)
sig = de_results[de_results['significant']]
plt.scatter(sig['log2FC'], -np.log10(sig['p_value']),
c='red', alpha=0.7, s=30)
plt.axhline(-np.log10(0.05), color='blue', linestyle='--')
plt.axvline(-1, color='blue', linestyle='--')
plt.axvline(1, color='blue', linestyle='--')
plt.xlabel('log2 Fold Change')
plt.ylabel('-log10(p-value)')
plt.title('Differential Metabolites')
Phase 6: Metabolic Pathway Analysis
Objective: Interpret metabolite changes at pathway level.
Metabolite Set Enrichment Analysis (MSEA):
def pathway_enrichment_metabolites(metabolite_list, organism='human'):
"""
Perform pathway enrichment for differential metabolites.
Uses KEGG metabolic pathways.
"""
from tooluniverse import ToolUniverse
tu = ToolUniverse()
kegg_ids = []
for metabolite in metabolite_list:
result = tu.run_one_function({
"name": "kegg_find_compound",
"arguments": {"query": metabolite}
})
if result and 'data' in result:
kegg_ids.append(result['data'][0]['entry_id'])
enrichment = tu.run_one_function({
"name": "kegg_enrich_pathway",
"arguments": {
"compound_list": ",".join(kegg_ids),
"organism": organism
}
})
return enrichment
Pathway topology analysis:
def pathway_topology_analysis(metabolites, pathway_id):
"""
Analyze pathway dysregulation considering topology.
Metabolites at key pathway positions (hubs, bottlenecks)
have more impact than peripheral metabolites.
"""
pass
Phase 7: Multi-Omics Integration
Objective: Integrate metabolomics with transcriptomics/proteomics.
Metabolite-enzyme correlation:
def correlate_metabolite_enzyme(metabolite_data, enzyme_expression):
"""
Correlate metabolite levels with enzyme expression.
Expected correlations:
- Substrate + enzyme → negative correlation (consumption)
- Product + enzyme → positive correlation (production)
"""
from scipy.stats import spearmanr
correlations = {}
for metabolite in metabolite_data.columns:
enzymes = find_metabolite_enzymes(metabolite)
for enzyme in enzymes:
if enzyme in enzyme_expression.index:
met_levels = metabolite_data[metabolite]
enz_expr = enzyme_expression.loc[enzyme]
r, p = spearmanr(met_levels, enz_expr)
correlations[f'{metabolite}_{enzyme}'] = {
'r': r,
'p': p,
'relationship': 'product' if r > 0 else 'substrate'
}
return correlations
Pathway-level integration:
def integrate_omics_pathway(metabolite_fc, gene_fc, pathway_id):
"""
Integrate metabolite and gene fold changes at pathway level.
For each reaction:
- Check if metabolites are changed
- Check if enzymes are changed
- Score pathway dysregulation (combined evidence)
"""
pathway_score = calculate_pathway_dysregulation(
metabolite_fc, gene_fc, pathway_id
)
return pathway_score
Phase 8: Report Generation
Generate comprehensive metabolomics report:
# Metabolomics Analysis Report
## Dataset Summary
- **Platform**: LC-MS/MS (Orbitrap)
- **Method**: Untargeted metabolomics
- **Samples**: 40 (20 disease, 20 control)
- **Metabolites Identified**: 324 (Level 1/2 confidence)
- **Metabolites Quantified**: 298 (after QC)
## Quality Control
- **CV in QC samples**: 18% median (acceptable: <30%)
- **Blank ratios**: All metabolites > 3x blank signal
- **Missing values**: 8% average per metabolite
- **Internal standard**: Recovery 95-105% across samples
## Normalization
- **Method**: Probabilistic Quotient Normalization (PQN)
- **Transformation**: log2
- **Batch correction**: Not required (single batch)
## Exploratory Analysis
- **PCA**: Clear separation between groups (PC1: 28%, PC2: 18%)
- **PLS-DA**: Excellent discrimination (R2=0.89, Q2=0.75)
- **Outliers**: 1 sample removed (technical failure)
## Differential Metabolites
- **Significant metabolites**: 87 (adj. p < 0.05, |log2FC| > 1)
- Increased: 52 metabolites
- Decreased: 35 metabolites
### Top Increased Metabolites
1. **Lactate** (log2FC=3.2, p=1e-12) - Glycolysis
2. (log2FC=2.8, p=1e-10) - Amino acid metabolism
(log2FC=2.5, p=1e-9) - Fatty acid synthesis
(log2FC=-2.9, p=1e-11) - TCA cycle
(log2FC=-2.3, p=1e-9) - Energy metabolism
(log2FC=-2.1, p=1e-8) - Redox balance
(p=1e-15)
12 metabolites: glucose, pyruvate, lactate, etc.
Direction: Increased flux to lactate (Warburg effect)
(p=1e-12)
8 metabolites: citrate, succinate, malate, etc.
Direction: Decreased activity
(p=1e-10)
6 metabolites: glutamine, glutamate, α-KG, etc.
Direction: Increased glutamine consumption
Expression: 3.5-fold increased (RNA + protein)
Lactate: 3.2-fold increased
Correlation: r=0.85 (p<0.001) - Concordant upregulation
Expression: 2.1-fold decreased
Citrate: 2.9-fold decreased
Correlation: r=0.78 (p<0.001) - TCA cycle suppression
Integration with RNA-seq and proteomics reveals:
: Shift from oxidative to glycolytic metabolism
: Increased glutaminolysis for anaplerosis
: Decreased NAD+/NADH ratio, oxidative stress
Random Forest model (10-fold CV):
: 0.96 ± 0.03
: 92%
:
Lactate
Glutamine
Citrate
ATP
Palmitate
Pyruvate
Succinate
NAD+
α-ketoglutarate
Glucose-6-phosphate
Metabolomics reveals fundamental metabolic reprogramming in disease state:
: Increased glycolysis with lactate accumulation despite oxygen availability (Warburg effect), driven by LDHA upregulation.
: Decreased citrate and TCA intermediates, consistent with IDH1 downregulation. Shunts carbon to biosynthesis.
: Elevated glutamine consumption and glutaminolysis provides alternative carbon source for anaplerosis and NADPH for biosynthesis.
: Increased palmitate indicates active fatty acid synthesis, supporting membrane production for proliferation.
: Despite active glycolysis, ATP levels are decreased, suggesting high energy demand outpacing production.
This metabolic signature is characteristic of proliferative, biosynthetically active cells typical of cancer or activated immune cells.
: LDHA inhibitors, glutaminase inhibitors to disrupt metabolic dependencies
: Lactate/citrate ratio as metabolic activity marker
: Metabolic phenotype may predict sensitivity to metabolic inhibitors
Integration with ToolUniverse
| Skill | Used For | Phase |
|---|
tooluniverse-gene-enrichment | Pathway enrichment | Phase 6 |
tooluniverse-rnaseq-deseq2 | Enzyme expression for integration | Phase 7 |
tooluniverse-proteomics-analysis | Protein levels for integration | Phase 7 |
tooluniverse-multi-omics-integration | Comprehensive integration | Phase 7 |
Quantified Minimums
| Component | Requirement |
|---|
| Metabolites | At least 50 identified metabolites |
| Replicates | At least 3 per condition |
| QC | CV < 30% in QC samples, blank subtraction |
| Statistical test | t-test or Wilcoxon with FDR correction |
| Pathway analysis | MSEA with KEGG or Reactome |
| Report | QC, differential metabolites, pathways, visualizations |
Limitations
- Identification: Many features remain unidentified (Level 4)
- Coverage: Cannot detect all metabolites (depends on method)
- Quantification: Relative abundance (not absolute concentration without standards)
- Isomers: Difficult to distinguish structural isomers
- Ion suppression: Matrix effects can affect quantification
- Dynamic range: Limited compared to targeted methods
References
Methods:
Databases: