| name | rnaseq-deseq2 |
| description | ToolUniverse workflow — Rnaseq Deseq2 |
| source | https://github.com/mims-harvard/ToolUniverse/tree/main/skills/tooluniverse-rnaseq-deseq2 |
| metadata | null |
name: tooluniverse-rnaseq-deseq2
description: Production-ready RNA-seq differential expression analysis using PyDESeq2. Performs DESeq2 normalization, dispersion estimation, Wald testing, LFC shrinkage, and result filtering. Handles multi-factor designs, multiple contrasts, batch effects, and integrates with gene enrichment (gseapy) and ToolUniverse annotation tools (UniProt, Ensembl, OpenTargets). Supports CSV/TSV/H5AD input formats and any organism. Use when analyzing RNA-seq count matrices, identifying DEGs, performing differential expression with statistical rigor, or answering questions about gene expression changes.
RNA-seq Differential Expression Analysis (DESeq2)
Comprehensive differential expression analysis of RNA-seq count data using PyDESeq2, with integrated enrichment analysis (gseapy) and gene annotation via ToolUniverse.
BixBench Coverage: Validated on 53 BixBench questions across 15 computational biology projects covering RNA-seq, miRNA-seq, and differential expression analysis tasks.
Core Principles
- Data-first approach - Load and validate count data and metadata BEFORE any analysis
- Statistical rigor - Always use proper normalization, dispersion estimation, and multiple testing correction
- Flexible design - Support single-factor, multi-factor, and interaction designs
- Threshold awareness - Apply user-specified thresholds exactly (padj, log2FC, baseMean)
- Reproducible - Set random seeds, document all parameters, output complete results
- Question-driven - Parse what the user is actually asking and extract the specific answer
- Enrichment integration - Chain DESeq2 results into pathway/GO enrichment when requested
- English-first queries - Use English gene/pathway names in all tool calls
When to Use This Skill
Apply when users:
- Have RNA-seq count matrices and want differential expression analysis
- Ask about DESeq2, DEGs, differential expression, padj, log2FC
- Need dispersion estimates or diagnostics
- Want enrichment analysis (GO, KEGG, Reactome) on DEGs
- Ask about specific gene expression changes between conditions
- Need to compare multiple strains/conditions/treatments
- Ask about batch effect correction in RNA-seq
- Questions mention "count data", "count matrix", "RNA-seq", "transcriptomics"
Required Packages
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from pydeseq2.dds import DeseqDataSet
from pydeseq2.ds import DeseqStats
import gseapy as gp
from tooluniverse import ToolUniverse
Installation:
pip install pydeseq2 gseapy pandas numpy scipy anndata
Analysis Workflow
Step 1: Question Parsing
CRITICAL FIRST STEP: Before writing ANY code, parse the question to identify:
- Data files: Look for
*counts*.csv, *metadata*.csv, *.h5ad
- Thresholds: Extract padj (default 0.05), log2FC (default 0), baseMean (default 0)
- Design: Identify factors mentioned ("strain", "condition", "batch")
- Contrast: Determine comparison ("A vs B", "mutant vs wildtype")
- Direction: Check if "upregulated", "downregulated", or both
- Enrichment: Look for "GO", "KEGG", "Reactome", "pathway"
- Specific genes: Check if asking about individual genes
See references/question_parsing.md for detailed parsing patterns.
Step 1.5: Design Formula Decision Tree ⚠️ CRITICAL
ALWAYS inspect metadata for ALL variables, not just what the question mentions!
Many experiments have hidden batch effects (media conditions, sequencing batches, time points) that MUST be included as covariates. Failing to account for these reduces statistical power and can lead to incorrect results.
Decision process:
- List ALL metadata columns (don't skip any!)
- Categorize each column:
- Biological interest: The factor you're testing (strain, treatment, genotype, condition)
- Batch/Block: Systematic covariates (media, batch, sequencing_run, time, plate)
- Irrelevant: Sample IDs, notes, file names
- Design formula:
- Single factor:
~condition (only if no batch variables exist)
- With covariates:
~batch1 + batch2 + condition (covariates first!)
- Interaction:
~batch + factor1 + factor2 + factor1:factor2
Example (critical real-world case):
Metadata columns: [Strain, Media, Replicate]
Question asks: "strain effects"
❌ WRONG: design="~Strain" (ignores Media!)
✅ CORRECT: design="~Media + Strain" (accounts for media variation)
Why: Even though question doesn't mention media, it systematically
affects expression. DESeq2 must remove media effects to properly test strain.
Rule of thumb: If a column has 2+ levels and represents an experimental condition (not sample ID), include it in design.
Step 2: Data Loading & Validation
Load count matrix and metadata, then validate alignment:
import pandas as pd
from scripts.load_count_matrix import load_count_matrix, validate_inputs
counts = load_count_matrix("counts.csv")
metadata = pd.read_csv("metadata.csv", index_col=0)
counts, metadata, issues = validate_inputs(counts, metadata)
Key considerations:
- Ensure samples as rows, genes as columns (PyDESeq2 requirement)
- Verify integer counts (round if needed)
- Align sample names between counts and metadata
- Remove zero-count genes
See references/data_loading.md for detailed data handling.
Step 2.5: Inspect Metadata Structure ⚠️ REQUIRED
Before choosing design formula, ALWAYS inspect metadata to identify all experimental factors:
print("Metadata columns and levels:")
for col in metadata.columns:
unique_vals = metadata[col].unique()
print(f" {col}: {len(unique_vals)} levels → {list(unique_vals)[:5]}")
This step prevents missing hidden batch effects that could invalidate your analysis.
Step 3: Run PyDESeq2
Execute differential expression analysis:
from pydeseq2.dds import DeseqDataSet
from pydeseq2.ds import DeseqStats
metadata['condition'] = pd.Categorical(
metadata['condition'],
categories=['control', 'treatment']
)
dds = DeseqDataSet(
counts=counts,
metadata=metadata,
design="~condition",
quiet=True
)
dds.deseq2()
stat_res = DeseqStats(dds, contrast=['condition', 'treatment', 'control'], quiet=True)
stat_res.run_wald_test()
stat_res.summary()
stat_res.lfc_shrink(coeff='condition[T.treatment]')
results = stat_res.results_df
Multi-Factor Design (Common Real-World Case)
When metadata has multiple experimental variables (e.g., strain + media conditions), ALWAYS include covariates:
metadata['media'] = pd.Categorical(
metadata['media'],
categories=['MMGluFeMinus', 'MMGluFePlus', 'Succinate']
)
metadata['strain'] = pd.Categorical(
metadata['strain'],
categories=['1', '97', '98', '99']
)
dds = DeseqDataSet(
counts=counts,
metadata=metadata,
design="~media + strain",
quiet=True
)
dds.deseq2()
stat_res = DeseqStats(dds, contrast=['strain', '98', '1'], quiet=True)
stat_res.run_wald_test()
stat_res.summary()
results = stat_res.results_df
Why this matters: DESeq2 will model media effects separately, removing media-driven variance before testing strain differences. This increases statistical power and prevents false positives/negatives.
When to use what:
- Python (PyDESeq2): Use for ALL DESeq2 analysis (normalization, testing, filtering)
- ToolUniverse: Use ONLY for gene annotation (ID conversion, pathway context)
- gseapy: Use for enrichment analysis (GO/KEGG/Reactome)
See references/pydeseq2_workflow.md for complete PyDESeq2 patterns including batch effects, interaction terms, and complex designs.
Step 4: Filter Results
Apply thresholds from the question:
sig_genes = results[
(results['padj'] < 0.05) &
(results['log2FoldChange'].abs() > 0.5) &
(results['baseMean'] > 10)
]
up_genes = sig_genes[sig_genes['log2FoldChange'] > 0]
down_genes = sig_genes[sig_genes['log2FoldChange'] < 0]
Common filtering patterns:
- Basic DEG count:
len(sig_genes)
- Specific gene value:
results.loc['GENE_NAME', 'log2FoldChange']
- Set operations: Use Python sets for "unique", "shared", "overlap"
See references/result_filtering.md for advanced filtering.
Step 5: Dispersion Analysis (if asked)
Access dispersion estimates:
disp_data = dds.var
genewise = dds.var['genewise_dispersions']
count_below = (genewise < 1e-5).sum()
Dispersion column mapping:
- "prior to fitting" →
genewise_dispersions
- "fitted dispersions" →
fitted_dispersions
- "after shrinkage" / "MAP" →
MAP_dispersions
- "final" →
dispersions
See references/dispersion_analysis.md for diagnostics.
Step 6: Enrichment Analysis (optional)
Run pathway enrichment on DEGs:
import gseapy as gp
gene_list = sig_genes.index.tolist()
enr = gp.enrich(
gene_list=gene_list,
gene_sets='GO_Biological_Process_2023',
background=None,
outdir=None,
cutoff=0.05,
no_plot=True,
verbose=False
)
top_pathways = enr.results.head(10)
Library selection:
- Human GO:
GO_Biological_Process_2023
- Mouse KEGG:
KEGG_2019_Mouse
- Human KEGG:
KEGG_2021_Human
- Reactome:
Reactome_2022
See references/enrichment_analysis.md for complete enrichment workflows.
Step 7: Gene Annotation with ToolUniverse (optional)
Use ToolUniverse ONLY for gene annotation, not analysis:
from tooluniverse import ToolUniverse
tu = ToolUniverse()
tu.load_tools()
result = tu.tools.MyGene_query_genes(query="TP53")
result = tu.tools.ensembl_lookup_gene(
gene_id="ENSG00000141510",
species="homo_sapiens"
)
Do NOT use ToolUniverse for:
- Differential expression (use PyDESeq2)
- Statistical testing (use scipy.stats)
- Enrichment analysis (use gseapy)
Output Formatting
Match the question's requested format:
round(value, 2)
f"{value:.2E}"
f"{value * 100:.1f}%"
int(len(sig_genes))
See references/output_formatting.md for all format patterns.
Common BixBench Patterns
Pattern 1: Basic DEG Count
Question: "How many genes show significant DE (padj < 0.05, |log2FC| > 0.5)?"
degs = results[(results['padj'] < 0.05) & (results['log2FoldChange'].abs() > 0.5)]
answer = len(degs)
Pattern 2: Specific Gene Value
Question: "What is the log2FC of gene X?"
answer = round(results.loc['GENE_X', 'log2FoldChange'], 2)
Pattern 3: Direction-Specific
Question: "How many genes are upregulated?"
up_degs = results[(results['padj'] < 0.05) & (results['log2FoldChange'] > 0)]
answer = len(up_degs)
Pattern 4: Set Operations
Question: "How many genes are uniquely DE in condition A?"
degs_A = set(results_A[results_A['padj'] < 0.05].index)
degs_B = set(results_B[results_B['padj'] < 0.05].index)
unique_A = degs_A - degs_B
answer = len(unique_A)
Pattern 5: Dispersion Count
Question: "How many genes have dispersion below 1e-5 prior to fitting?"
genewise = dds.var['genewise_dispersions']
answer = (genewise < 1e-5).sum()
See references/bixbench_examples.md for all 10 patterns with examples.
Error Handling
| Error | Solution |
|---|
| "No matching samples" | Check if counts need transposing; strip whitespace |
| "Dispersion trend did not converge" | Use fit_type='mean' |
| "Contrast not found" | Check metadata['factor'].unique() for exact names |
| "Non-integer counts" | Round to integers OR use t-test for normalized data |
| "NaN in padj" | Independent filtering removed genes; exclude from counts |
See references/troubleshooting.md for complete debugging guide.
Validation Checklist
Every analysis MUST include:
Data Loading:
DESeq2 Analysis:
Results:
Quality Checks:
Known Limitations
PyDESeq2 vs R DESeq2 Differences
This skill uses PyDESeq2 (Python implementation) for differential expression analysis. While PyDESeq2 faithfully implements the DESeq2 algorithm, numerical differences exist between Python and R implementations:
Dispersion Estimation:
- Dispersion estimates may differ from R DESeq2, especially for very low dispersion genes (< 1e-05)
- This is due to different numerical optimization methods between Python and R statistical libraries
- Results are still statistically valid and biologically meaningful
- If you need exact R DESeq2 dispersions for benchmark reproducibility, consider using R DESeq2 directly via rpy2
For Most Analyses: PyDESeq2 provides accurate, publication-quality results. The differences are in numerical precision, not statistical validity.
GO/KEGG Enrichment (gseapy vs clusterProfiler)
Enrichment analysis uses Python gseapy by default. Results may differ from R clusterProfiler due to:
- Different enrichment algorithms and statistical tests
- Different GO/KEGG database versions
- Different term simplification/redundancy removal methods
For R clusterProfiler Compatibility:
If you need results matching R clusterProfiler exactly (e.g., for benchmark reproducibility):
from rpy2.robjects.packages import importr
from rpy2.robjects import pandas2ri, vectors
pandas2ri.activate()
clusterProfiler = importr('clusterProfiler')
orgdb = importr('org.Hs.eg.db')
gene_list = sig_genes.index.tolist()
r_genes = vectors.StrVector(gene_list)
enrich_result = clusterProfiler.enrichGO(
gene=r_genes,
OrgDb=orgdb.org_Hs_eg_db,
ont='BP',
pAdjustMethod='BH',
pvalueCutoff=0.05,
qvalueCutoff=0.2
)
simplified = clusterProfiler.simplify(enrich_result, cutoff=0.7, by='p.adjust')
results_df = pandas2ri.rpy2py(simplified)
Default behavior: Uses gseapy (no R dependencies required). This is sufficient for most analyses and provides valid enrichment results.
When to use R clusterProfiler:
- When exact reproducibility with R-based benchmarks is required
- When collaborating with R users who need identical results
- When specific clusterProfiler features (GSEA, compareCluster) are needed
References
Detailed documentation for advanced topics:
Utility Scripts
Helper scripts for common tasks: