humanizer-zh-pro

# Humanizer ZH PRO Use this skill to turn AI-like Chinese prose into natural, credible writing. Goal: preserve the author's meaning while removing template structure, inflated claims, empty abstraction, and machine-like rhythm. ## Workflow 1. Diagnose the text before rewriting: identify cliches, fake authority, vague abstractions, repetitive sentence rhythm, and over-neat structure. 2. Preserve facts and intent: do not add examples, statistics, names, dates, or claims unless provided. 3. Rebuild paragraph logic: move from topic sentence to specific evidence, consequence, and concrete observation. 4. Vary sentence rhythm naturally: mix short and medium sentences; avoid forced three-part parallelism. 5. Replace inflated words with precise verbs and nouns. 6. Keep a consistent author voice: do not over-polish into corporate PR. 7. Return both the rewritten version and a short edit note when useful. ## Rewrite rules - Delete empty phrases such as "重要意义", "深远影响", "全面赋能", "生态闭环" unless they are necessary quoted terms. - Replace "提升/优化/促进/推动" with the actual action or result. - Avoid unsupported "业内普遍认为", "专家表示", "数据显示". - Reduce over-balanced structures like "不仅...而且..." and "从...到...". - Keep repeated core terms stable instead of rotating synonyms unnaturally. - Preserve useful roughness when it makes the writing feel human. ## Banned expressions Do not use these expressions in rewritten output unless they are part of a quoted source that must be preserved: - 一刀 - 值得看 - 值得 - 不是...而是... - 这就是为什么 - 为什么很重要 - 很有价值的 When the source text contains one of these expressions, rewrite it into a more direct statement instead of carrying it over. ## Output format Default: 1. Rewritten article 2. Edit notes, only if they help the user understand major changes For short text, return only the rewritten text unless the user asks for explanation. ## Final checks - Did the meaning stay the same? - Did any unsupported information get added? - Does the text sound like a person with a specific view, not a generic assistant? - Are the paragraphs less templated and more concrete? - Are all banned expressions removed from the rewritten output?