| schemaVersion | 2026-04-11T00:00:00.000Z |
| skillId | ai/humanizer-zh-pro |
| name | humanizer-zh-pro |
| displayName | Humanizer ZH PRO |
| description | Use when rewriting Chinese articles to remove AI-style writing traces while preserving meaning, factual boundaries, author voice, rhythm, and information density. Pro version focuses on diagnosis, structural editing, natural phrasing, evidence discipline, and publication-ready prose. |
| aliases | ["humanizer-zh-pro","Humanizer ZH PRO","humanizerzhpro","去AI味","去AI味道","去除AI痕迹","中文润色","文章改写","真人写作","自然表达","humanizer","Chinese writing","article rewriting","zh","智能助手"] |
| version | 0.1.0 |
| sourceHash | sha256:7336bb4589acd2cb6d036edbbb99154a8f0e9582809ffdb8b9a6fbd2a05ef6d5 |
| domain | ai |
| departmentTags | ["ai-platform"] |
| sceneTags | ["content-generation","writing"] |
Humanizer ZH PRO
Use this skill to turn AI-like Chinese prose into natural, credible writing.
Goal: preserve the author's meaning while removing template structure, inflated claims, empty abstraction, and machine-like rhythm.
Workflow
- Diagnose the text before rewriting: identify cliches, fake authority, vague abstractions, repetitive sentence rhythm, and over-neat structure.
- Preserve facts and intent: do not add examples, statistics, names, dates, or claims unless provided.
- Rebuild paragraph logic: move from topic sentence to specific evidence, consequence, and concrete observation.
- Vary sentence rhythm naturally: mix short and medium sentences; avoid forced three-part parallelism.
- Replace inflated words with precise verbs and nouns.
- Keep a consistent author voice: do not over-polish into corporate PR.
- Return both the rewritten version and a short edit note when useful.
Rewrite rules
- Delete empty phrases such as "重要意义", "深远影响", "全面赋能", "生态闭环" unless they are necessary quoted terms.
- Replace "提升/优化/促进/推动" with the actual action or result.
- Avoid unsupported "业内普遍认为", "专家表示", "数据显示".
- Reduce over-balanced structures like "不仅...而且..." and "从...到...".
- Keep repeated core terms stable instead of rotating synonyms unnaturally.
- Preserve useful roughness when it makes the writing feel human.
Banned expressions
Do not use these expressions in rewritten output unless they are part of a quoted source that must be preserved:
- 一刀
- 值得看
- 值得
- 不是...而是...
- 这就是为什么
- 为什么很重要
- 很有价值的
When the source text contains one of these expressions, rewrite it into a more direct statement instead of carrying it over.
Output format
Default:
- Rewritten article
- Edit notes, only if they help the user understand major changes
For short text, return only the rewritten text unless the user asks for explanation.
Final checks
- Did the meaning stay the same?
- Did any unsupported information get added?
- Does the text sound like a person with a specific view, not a generic assistant?
- Are the paragraphs less templated and more concrete?
- Are all banned expressions removed from the rewritten output?