Skip to main content

research-compensation

Research compensation using comparable scope, location, level, currency, and total-reward evidence with transparent uncertainty. Use when setting expectations, evaluating an offer, or preparing a negotiation.

Datos de origen

Repositorio
protosphinx/sphinxstack
Última actividad en el origen
29 de julio de 2026 a las 13:55
Idioma detectado de SKILL.md
inglés
Estrellas
3
Forks
0

Opciones de instalación

De forma predeterminada está seleccionado el prompt que primero revisa el origen. Puedes cambiar a un comando directo o descargar una copia local.

Revisa los archivos de origen

Lee SKILL.md y los archivos complementarios que muestra SkillsMP antes de decidir si quieres instalarlo.

Explorador de archivos
2 archivos

Mostrando SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instrucciones de origen · Vista previa de solo lectura
name
research-compensation
category
get-hired
description
Research compensation using comparable scope, location, level, currency, and total-reward evidence with transparent uncertainty. Use when setting expectations, evaluating an offer, or preparing a negotiation.
# research-compensation Compare like with like before quoting a range. ## When to use - Use for salary, hourly pay, contract rates, commission, bonus, or total compensation. - Treat public estimates as evidence with provenance, not guaranteed entitlement. ## Procedure 1. Define role family, responsibilities, level, management scope, skills, industry, company stage, location, work arrangement, and employment type. 2. Collect dated ranges from official postings, government data, reputable surveys, professional groups, recruiters, and relevant peers. 3. Record source, sample, date, currency, pay period, geography, inclusion of bonus or equity, and known bias. 4. Normalize base pay to one annual or hourly basis and convert currency using a dated rate. 5. Separate base, cash incentive, commission, equity, retirement, health, leave, allowances, and one-time payments. 6. Adjust comparisons for scope, hours, level, location, company type, and risk without pretending to precise certainty. 7. Use a distribution or low-mid-high band, not one average. 8. Compare the target package against several plausible scenarios and personal thresholds. 9. Cite the sources and state where evidence is sparse or stale. ## Failure plan - If sources mix incomparable roles or total-compensation definitions, split the dataset rather than averaging them. - If market evidence is thin, widen uncertainty and prioritize written role scope. ## Done - A compensation evidence table contains normalized comparable data, source provenance, dates, definitions, and limitations - A reasoned range separates pay components and explains role, location, level, currency, and uncertainty assumptions
Ver en GitHub