Skip to main content

research-compensation

Research compensation using comparable scope, location, level, currency, and total-reward evidence with transparent uncertainty. Use when setting expectations, evaluating an offer, or preparing a negotiation.

Informations de source

Dépôt
protosphinx/sphinxstack
Dernière activité de la source
29 juillet 2026 à 13:55
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
3
Forks
0

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Explorateur de fichiers
2 fichiers

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
research-compensation
category
get-hired
description
Research compensation using comparable scope, location, level, currency, and total-reward evidence with transparent uncertainty. Use when setting expectations, evaluating an offer, or preparing a negotiation.
# research-compensation Compare like with like before quoting a range. ## When to use - Use for salary, hourly pay, contract rates, commission, bonus, or total compensation. - Treat public estimates as evidence with provenance, not guaranteed entitlement. ## Procedure 1. Define role family, responsibilities, level, management scope, skills, industry, company stage, location, work arrangement, and employment type. 2. Collect dated ranges from official postings, government data, reputable surveys, professional groups, recruiters, and relevant peers. 3. Record source, sample, date, currency, pay period, geography, inclusion of bonus or equity, and known bias. 4. Normalize base pay to one annual or hourly basis and convert currency using a dated rate. 5. Separate base, cash incentive, commission, equity, retirement, health, leave, allowances, and one-time payments. 6. Adjust comparisons for scope, hours, level, location, company type, and risk without pretending to precise certainty. 7. Use a distribution or low-mid-high band, not one average. 8. Compare the target package against several plausible scenarios and personal thresholds. 9. Cite the sources and state where evidence is sparse or stale. ## Failure plan - If sources mix incomparable roles or total-compensation definitions, split the dataset rather than averaging them. - If market evidence is thin, widen uncertainty and prioritize written role scope. ## Done - A compensation evidence table contains normalized comparable data, source provenance, dates, definitions, and limitations - A reasoned range separates pay components and explains role, location, level, currency, and uncertainty assumptions
Voir sur GitHub