omh-support-operations

name	omh-support-operations
description	["omh"]
Turn a support case into a clear customer reply, severity path, and owned next step. Use when the user says	support escalation, customer support reply, ticket triage, 고객 지원 에스컬레이션, 고객 답변 초안, 지원 티켓 분류.
metadata	{"hermes":{"tags":["workflow","oh-my-hermes","triage"],"category":"triage","phase":"support-operations","role":"operator","quality_tier":"triage-gated"}}

Support Operations

This is a Hermes-native support-operations workflow skill.

Why This Exists

support-operations turns a bounded customer case into response and escalation guidance without treating drafts or recommendations as helpdesk actions.

Do Not Use When

• The request clusters a backlog of customer signals to find product patterns or roadmap candidates; use feedback-triage.
• The user only needs a generic, non-support marketing or email rewrite with no case, severity, or escalation context; use content-operator.
• The request asks to send a reply, change ticket priority or status, issue a refund, modify an account, or update a helpdesk; use connector-operator with an explicit target and observed result.
• The request is an active reliability incident or postmortem rather than a support-case response; use reliability-review.

Examples

Good example:

• Prompt: Draft a calm reply for this login-outage customer and tell me whether it needs an engineering escalation.
• Expected behavior: Prepare a customer-safe reply, severity matrix, engineering escalation recommendation, and owner handoff.
• Why: The request is one support case with reply and escalation decisions, not a feedback backlog or ticket mutation.

Bad example:

• Prompt: Cluster last quarter's support feedback into roadmap opportunities.
• Expected behavior: Route to feedback-triage, not support-operations.
• Why: A historical signal backlog needs product-pattern triage rather than case-level support guidance.

Completion Checklist

• The source boundary, signal clusters, severity, and follow-up lane are named.
• Bug, feature, research, strategy, and coding handoff outcomes stay separate.
• The next workflow is recommended before any implementation claim.

Recovery Notes

• If feedback lacks source or severity, ask for the missing signal before coding handoff.
• If the item is actually a plan or research request, route to that workflow instead of triage.

Workflow Lane

• Current lane: Research and company ops (source-finder, research, best-practice-research, autoresearch-goal, research-brief, strategy-brief, feedback-triage, research-department, +13 more) - research, signals, ops, and briefings.
• If intent belongs to another lane, hand back to oh-my-hermes or name the adjacent workflow.
• Shared product, routing, compatibility, and evidence rules: omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md.

Use When

Use when one or a bounded set of support contacts needs response drafting, urgency classification, incident/escalation routing, and follow-up ownership.

Strong routing signals: `support escalation`, `customer support reply`, `ticket triage`, `고객 지원 에스컬레이션`, `고객 답변 초안`, `지원 티켓 분류`

Catalog Metadata

Category: triage Phase: support-operations Hermes role: operator Quality tier: triage-gated Reasoning demand: standard

Quality bar:

• State issue, severity, impact, evidence gaps, owner, and next route.
• Draft a reply without treating it as a sent customer communication.

Handoff policy:

Keep domain framing, clarification, source/evidence synthesis, draft outputs, and next-work routing in Hermes. A prepared brief, review, reply, or plan is not an external action, approval, filing, send, publish, data mutation, implementation, review, CI, or merge claim. Prepare a connector, file, coding, or human-review handoff only when the user explicitly accepts that next step; report it only from observed evidence. Reply text is a draft, escalation is a recommendation, and no ticket state, message send, refund, account action, or customer outcome is claimed.

Required inputs:

• support case
• known facts
• customer impact
• available ownership or escalation path

Expert clarification questions:

• support case
  • English: Which support case should we examine first?
  • Korean: 어떤 지원 사례를 먼저 살펴봐야 하나요?

Expected outputs:

• customer-safe reply draft with stated facts, unknowns, and tone
• issue/severity/impact/escalation matrix
• internal next-step and owner handoff brief
• missing repro, account, entitlement, or approval evidence list

Artifact expectations:

• prepared support case brief when a wrapper captures it

Safety rules:

• Keep customer-safe facts, unknowns, and escalation recommendations distinct.
• Do not claim ticket mutation, message send, refund, account action, or case outcome.

Runtime Evidence

Preferred harness for this skill: ops-review.

omh runtime record --skill support-operations --harness ops-review --status started

Record observed delegation results; otherwise return not_available or not_observed. Prepared OMH routing is not execution, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.

• Treat wrapper memory/context summaries as advisory local context, not proof of opaque Hermes memory reads or changes. Preserve workflow intent and stop conditions; verify before claiming completion.

Use Hermes-native subagent/delegation features when available: native subagents -> Hermes delegation when available, otherwise sequential lanes.

Shared product, compatibility, topology, memory, harness, and execution rules: omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md. Load it when applicable; otherwise name an unavailable capability.