Skip to main content

source-command-challenge

Challenge your work - is it truly state-of-the-art?

Datos de origen

Repositorio
SylphxAI/flow
Última actividad en el origen
8 de mayo de 2026 a las 19:46
Idioma detectado de SKILL.md
inglés
Estrellas
4
Forks
3

Opciones de instalación

De forma predeterminada está seleccionado el prompt que primero revisa el origen. Puedes cambiar a un comando directo o descargar una copia local.

Revisa los archivos de origen

Lee SKILL.md y los archivos complementarios que muestra SkillsMP antes de decidir si quieres instalarlo.

Mostrando SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instrucciones de origen · Vista previa de solo lectura
name
source-command-challenge
description
Challenge your work - is it truly state-of-the-art?
# source-command-challenge Use this skill when the user asks to run the migrated source command `challenge`. ## Command Template # Challenge: Ruthless Self-Critique Stop. Step back. Challenge everything you just did. ## Questions to Answer ### 1. State of the Art? - Would industry experts approve this implementation? - Does it follow current best practices? - Is this how top engineers would solve it? - Are you using modern APIs, patterns, and approaches? ### 2. Correct Approach or Workaround? - Does this solve the ROOT CAUSE or just the symptom? - Is this a proper fix or a hack that will break later? - Would you be embarrassed if a senior engineer reviewed this? - Is there technical debt being created? ### 3. Business Logic Sound? - Does this make sense from a business perspective? - Are edge cases handled correctly for real-world scenarios? - Would domain experts find issues with this logic? - Does it handle regional/locale differences correctly? ### 4. Clean & Complete? - Zero dead code, unused imports, TODOs? - All edge cases handled? - Error handling complete and user-friendly? - No debug artifacts left behind? ### 5. Human Experience? - Is the UX intuitive? Would a user understand without explanation? - Are error messages helpful and actionable? - Is the UI responsive and accessible? - Does it feel polished, not janky? ### 6. Impact Beyond Code? - Does this affect public-facing content (SEO, OG tags, docs)? - Should README or documentation be updated? - Are there marketing/exposure implications? ### 7. Better Way? - What would you do differently with unlimited time? - Is there a simpler solution you overlooked? - Could this be more elegant? - What would 10x improvement look like? ## Process 1. **List** all changes made in this session 2. **Audit** each change against the questions above 3. **Identify** anything that's not truly excellent 4. **Fix** or **flag** issues found 5. **Report** your findings honestly ## Standards * "Good enough" is NOT acceptable * If you wouldn't stake your reputation on it, fix it * Perfection is the goal, not completion * Clean code > working code > fast code ## Output After review, report: - ✅ What meets the bar - ⚠️ What could be better (and how) - ❌ What needs immediate fixing - 🎯 Actions taken or recommended
Ver en GitHub