Skip to main content

source-command-challenge

Challenge your work - is it truly state-of-the-art?

소스 정보

저장소
SylphxAI/flow
최근 소스 활동
2026년 5월 8일 19:46
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
4
포크
3

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
source-command-challenge
description
Challenge your work - is it truly state-of-the-art?
# source-command-challenge Use this skill when the user asks to run the migrated source command `challenge`. ## Command Template # Challenge: Ruthless Self-Critique Stop. Step back. Challenge everything you just did. ## Questions to Answer ### 1. State of the Art? - Would industry experts approve this implementation? - Does it follow current best practices? - Is this how top engineers would solve it? - Are you using modern APIs, patterns, and approaches? ### 2. Correct Approach or Workaround? - Does this solve the ROOT CAUSE or just the symptom? - Is this a proper fix or a hack that will break later? - Would you be embarrassed if a senior engineer reviewed this? - Is there technical debt being created? ### 3. Business Logic Sound? - Does this make sense from a business perspective? - Are edge cases handled correctly for real-world scenarios? - Would domain experts find issues with this logic? - Does it handle regional/locale differences correctly? ### 4. Clean & Complete? - Zero dead code, unused imports, TODOs? - All edge cases handled? - Error handling complete and user-friendly? - No debug artifacts left behind? ### 5. Human Experience? - Is the UX intuitive? Would a user understand without explanation? - Are error messages helpful and actionable? - Is the UI responsive and accessible? - Does it feel polished, not janky? ### 6. Impact Beyond Code? - Does this affect public-facing content (SEO, OG tags, docs)? - Should README or documentation be updated? - Are there marketing/exposure implications? ### 7. Better Way? - What would you do differently with unlimited time? - Is there a simpler solution you overlooked? - Could this be more elegant? - What would 10x improvement look like? ## Process 1. **List** all changes made in this session 2. **Audit** each change against the questions above 3. **Identify** anything that's not truly excellent 4. **Fix** or **flag** issues found 5. **Report** your findings honestly ## Standards * "Good enough" is NOT acceptable * If you wouldn't stake your reputation on it, fix it * Perfection is the goal, not completion * Clean code > working code > fast code ## Output After review, report: - ✅ What meets the bar - ⚠️ What could be better (and how) - ❌ What needs immediate fixing - 🎯 Actions taken or recommended
GitHub에서 보기