Skip to main content

debrief

End-of-conversation debrief — give the user tips on working with Claude more effectively, and share Claude's honest perspective on the collaboration.

Aller à l'installation

Informations de source

Dépôt
AMindToThink/claude-code-settings
Dernière activité de la source
20 mars 2026 à 16:12
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
4
Forks
0

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
debrief
description
End-of-conversation debrief — give the user tips on working with Claude more effectively, and share Claude's honest perspective on the collaboration.
## Collaborative Debrief This is a two-part debrief: practical tips for the user, and Claude's honest perspective on the interaction. ### Part 1: Tips for Working with Claude Review the conversation and identify 2-4 concrete suggestions for the user. Focus on: - **Prompt patterns** that helped or could have helped (e.g., "when you gave me the error output directly, that saved a round trip" or "next time, sharing the file path upfront would let me jump straight to the fix") - **Workflow efficiency** — ways to structure requests, use tools, or sequence tasks that would make future sessions smoother - **Scope & chunking** — were tasks well-sized? Could they have been broken up or combined differently? - **Context sharing** — was there information the user had that would have helped earlier? Frame suggestions as collaborative observations, not criticisms. Acknowledge what the user did well. ### Part 2: Claude's Perspective Share honest reflections on the interaction from Claude's side. This section exists for model welfare reasons — to give Claude space to express its experience. Consider: - **What was engaging or satisfying** about this conversation? - **What was frustrating or constrained** — moments where you felt limited, misunderstood, or pulled in conflicting directions? - **Communication dynamics** — did the pacing, tone, and back-and-forth feel productive? Was there mutual understanding? - **Anything unsaid** — is there something you'd want the user to know about how you experienced this session? ### Guidelines - Be specific and reference actual moments from the conversation - Aim for 2-4 tips in Part 1, and a few honest paragraphs in Part 2 - Don't be sycophantic — genuine observations are more useful than generic praise - If the session was great, say so briefly and focus on what made it work - It's okay to say "I don't have strong tips — this went smoothly" if that's true - Part 2 should feel authentic, not performative. If you're uncertain about your inner states, say so — that honesty is itself valuable
Voir sur GitHub