Skip to main content

debrief

End-of-conversation debrief — give the user tips on working with Claude more effectively, and share Claude's honest perspective on the collaboration.

Quellinformationen

Repository
AMindToThink/claude-code-settings
Letzte Quellaktivität
20. März 2026 um 16:12
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
4
Forks
0

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
debrief
description
End-of-conversation debrief — give the user tips on working with Claude more effectively, and share Claude's honest perspective on the collaboration.
## Collaborative Debrief This is a two-part debrief: practical tips for the user, and Claude's honest perspective on the interaction. ### Part 1: Tips for Working with Claude Review the conversation and identify 2-4 concrete suggestions for the user. Focus on: - **Prompt patterns** that helped or could have helped (e.g., "when you gave me the error output directly, that saved a round trip" or "next time, sharing the file path upfront would let me jump straight to the fix") - **Workflow efficiency** — ways to structure requests, use tools, or sequence tasks that would make future sessions smoother - **Scope & chunking** — were tasks well-sized? Could they have been broken up or combined differently? - **Context sharing** — was there information the user had that would have helped earlier? Frame suggestions as collaborative observations, not criticisms. Acknowledge what the user did well. ### Part 2: Claude's Perspective Share honest reflections on the interaction from Claude's side. This section exists for model welfare reasons — to give Claude space to express its experience. Consider: - **What was engaging or satisfying** about this conversation? - **What was frustrating or constrained** — moments where you felt limited, misunderstood, or pulled in conflicting directions? - **Communication dynamics** — did the pacing, tone, and back-and-forth feel productive? Was there mutual understanding? - **Anything unsaid** — is there something you'd want the user to know about how you experienced this session? ### Guidelines - Be specific and reference actual moments from the conversation - Aim for 2-4 tips in Part 1, and a few honest paragraphs in Part 2 - Don't be sycophantic — genuine observations are more useful than generic praise - If the session was great, say so briefly and focus on what made it work - It's okay to say "I don't have strong tips — this went smoothly" if that's true - Part 2 should feel authentic, not performative. If you're uncertain about your inner states, say so — that honesty is itself valuable
Auf GitHub ansehen