Skip to main content

writing-tests

Write and edit test files that model real user flows. Use when creating, modifying, or reviewing test files.

Informations de source

Dépôt
cashew-labs/libretto
Dernière activité de la source
2 avril 2026 à 22:08
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
902
Forks
70

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
writing-tests
description
Write and edit test files that model real user flows. Use when creating, modifying, or reviewing test files.
# Writing Tests ## Core Principle: Tests Are User Flows Each test should represent a single, concrete flow that a real user would follow when interacting with the system. Write tests at the same abstraction level as the user experiences the system. ## Rules ### 1. Match the user's interface exactly The test should call the system the same way a user would. If the system is a CLI, the test should invoke the CLI with argument strings. If it's a library, the test should call the public API. Don't wrap the interface in test-specific helpers that hide what's actually happening. **Good** — the test reads like what a user would do: ```ts const result = await librettoCli("setup --skip-browsers"); expect(result.exitCode).toBe(0); const result2 = await librettoCli("--help"); expect(result2.stdout).toContain("Usage:"); ``` **Bad** — extra abstraction obscures the actual interaction: ```ts const result = await setupWithDefaults(); // hides the real CLI invocation assertSuccess(result); // hides what "success" means ``` ### 2. Keep tests verbose and concrete Don't introduce helpers for brevity. The value of a test is that you can read it top-to-bottom and understand exactly what's happening. Repetition across tests is fine — each test should be self-contained and readable on its own. ### 3. One flow per test Each test should exercise one coherent user scenario from setup through assertion. Don't combine unrelated flows into a single test, and don't split one logical flow across multiple tests. ### 4. Tests form a behavioral hull The full set of tests for a system should cover the sufficiently complete set of flows a user might follow. Think about: - The happy path for each major feature - Edge cases a user would realistically hit - Error cases and what the user sees when things go wrong When adding a new feature, add tests that cover the new user flows it introduces. When fixing a bug, add a test that reproduces the flow where the bug occurred.
Voir sur GitHub