Skip to main content

writing-tests

Write and edit test files that model real user flows. Use when creating, modifying, or reviewing test files.

Ir para a instalação

Informações da origem

Repositório
cashew-labs/libretto
Última atividade na origem
2 de abril de 2026 às 22:08
Idioma detectado do SKILL.md
inglês
Estrelas
899
Forks
69

Opções de instalação

Por padrão, está selecionado o prompt que primeiro revisa a origem. Você pode mudar para um comando direto ou baixar uma cópia local.

Revise os arquivos de origem

Leia o SKILL.md e os arquivos complementares exibidos pelo SkillsMP antes de decidir se vai instalar.

Exibindo SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura
name
writing-tests
description
Write and edit test files that model real user flows. Use when creating, modifying, or reviewing test files.
# Writing Tests ## Core Principle: Tests Are User Flows Each test should represent a single, concrete flow that a real user would follow when interacting with the system. Write tests at the same abstraction level as the user experiences the system. ## Rules ### 1. Match the user's interface exactly The test should call the system the same way a user would. If the system is a CLI, the test should invoke the CLI with argument strings. If it's a library, the test should call the public API. Don't wrap the interface in test-specific helpers that hide what's actually happening. **Good** — the test reads like what a user would do: ```ts const result = await librettoCli("setup --skip-browsers"); expect(result.exitCode).toBe(0); const result2 = await librettoCli("--help"); expect(result2.stdout).toContain("Usage:"); ``` **Bad** — extra abstraction obscures the actual interaction: ```ts const result = await setupWithDefaults(); // hides the real CLI invocation assertSuccess(result); // hides what "success" means ``` ### 2. Keep tests verbose and concrete Don't introduce helpers for brevity. The value of a test is that you can read it top-to-bottom and understand exactly what's happening. Repetition across tests is fine — each test should be self-contained and readable on its own. ### 3. One flow per test Each test should exercise one coherent user scenario from setup through assertion. Don't combine unrelated flows into a single test, and don't split one logical flow across multiple tests. ### 4. Tests form a behavioral hull The full set of tests for a system should cover the sufficiently complete set of flows a user might follow. Think about: - The happy path for each major feature - Edge cases a user would realistically hit - Error cases and what the user sees when things go wrong When adding a new feature, add tests that cover the new user flows it introduces. When fixing a bug, add a test that reproduces the flow where the bug occurred.
Ver no GitHub