When the user wants to identify and nurture developer advocates, build champion programs, or turn active users into contributors and evangelists. Trigger phrases include "power users," "developer advocates," "ambassador program," "champion program," "community contributors," "referral...
Installer avec Codex ou Claude Copiez ce prompt, collez-le dans Codex, Claude ou un autre assistant, puis laissez-le vérifier la page du skill et l'installer pour vous.
Une commande directe contourne le prompt de vérification. Examinez la source avant de l'exécuter.
When the user wants to identify and nurture developer advocates, build champion programs, or turn active users into contributors and evangelists. Trigger phrases include "power users," "developer advocates," "ambassador program," "champion program," "community contributors," "referral...
Use this skill when you need when the user wants to identify and nurture developer advocates, build champion programs, or turn active users into contributors and evangelists. Trigger phrases include "power users," "developer advocates," "ambassador program," "champion program," "community contributors," "referral...
This skill helps you identify your most engaged developers and turn them into advocates, contributors, and champions. No forced evangelism — just creating genuine value for developers who already love what you're building.
Before You Start
Load your developer audience context:
Check if .agents/developer-audience-context.md exists
If not, run the developer-audience-context skill first
Understanding where your developers hang out and what motivates them is essential
Gather your data:
Usage metrics by user
Community participation data
Support interactions (helpful answers, feature requests)
Content created about your product
Referral/invitation history
The Power User Spectrum
Not all engaged users want the same relationship:
Level
Behavior
What They Want
Your Response
Active User
Uses product regularly
Product to keep working
Keep shipping
Engaged User
Participates in community
Help and recognition
Respond quickly
Advocate
Recommends you unprompted
Insider access
Early access, direct line
Champion
Creates content, answers questions
Platform and recognition
Formal program
Contributor
Contributes code, docs, extensions
Impact and ownership
Contributor program
Key insight: Don't try to push everyone up the spectrum. Meet developers where they are. Some just want a great product — that's fine.
Identifying Potential Advocates
Behavioral Signals
Look for these patterns in your data:
Usage-based signals:
- Top 10% by API calls or usage
- Using advanced/power features
- Long tenure (>6 months active)
- Multiple projects using your product
- Early adopter of new features
Community signals:
- Answers questions from other users
- Files detailed, constructive bug reports
- Requests features thoughtfully
- Active in Discord/Slack/forums
- Mentions you positively on social
Content signals:
- Wrote blog post about your product
- Created tutorial or video
- Open sourced integration or extension
- Conference talk mentioning you
- Stack Overflow answers recommending you
Social Listening for Discovery
Set up monitoring for:
Positive mentions:
People recommending your product
Success stories shared publicly
"Just shipped with [your product]" posts
Content creators:
Blog posts about your product
Tutorial videos
Conference talk announcements
Community helpers:
People answering questions about you
Defending your product in discussions
Sharing tips and tricks
Building a Power User List
Create a simple tracker:
Name
Company
Signals
Score
Status
@jane
Startup X
Top usage, wrote blog post, answers Qs
92
Champion candidate
@john
Agency Y
Heavy usage, feature requests
65
Engaged user
@sam
Corp Z
Multiple repos using product
58
Advocate candidate
Score calculation:
Usage in top 10%: +20
Community active: +15
Created content: +25
Answers others' questions: +20
Positive social mentions: +10
Feature requests accepted: +10
Ambassador / Champion Programs
Program Design
Tiered vs flat structure:
Structure
Best For
Pros
Cons
Tiered (Bronze/Silver/Gold)
Large communities
Clear progression
Can feel corporate
Flat (all equal)
Small communities
Simple, egalitarian
Less motivation
Invite-only
Premium feeling
Exclusive, high quality
Scaling issues
Application-based
Qualifying interest
Self-selected engaged users
Rejection handling
Recommended: Start invite-only and small. Expand once you understand what works.
Benefits That Developers Value
Do offer:
Benefit
Why It Works
Early access to features
Insider feeling, first to know
Direct line to team
Skip support queue, real influence
Conference ticket sponsorship
Tangible value, networking
Exclusive swag
Quality items, not junk
Public recognition
Build their personal brand
Reference/recommendation
Career value
AWS/GCP credits
Tangible value for projects
Contributor credits
Public attribution
Don't offer:
Benefit
Why It Fails
Mandatory content quotas
Feels like work
Heavy NDA restrictions
Kills enthusiasm
Commission-based referrals
Feels like MLM
Generic discounts
Cheap, not special
Titles without substance
"Ambassador" with no benefits
Champion Program Template
# [PRODUCT] Champions Program## What Champions Do- Share feedback directly with our team
- Help other developers in community
- Create content when inspired (not required)
- Test new features before public release
## What Champions Get- Private Slack channel with engineering team
- Early access to all features (2-week head start)
- Annual conference ticket sponsorship ($2,000 value)
- Quarterly swag drops (quality items, not junk)
- Public recognition on our website
- Reference letters upon request
## Expectations- Be active in community at least 1x/week
- Give honest feedback (including criticism)
- No content quotas — create when you want to
- Maintain constructive, helpful tone
## How to Join
By invitation only. We identify champions through:
- Community participation
- Content creation
- Usage and engagement
If you think you qualify, email champions@[product].com
Running the Program
Monthly rhythm:
Week 1: Share upcoming features, gather feedback
Week 2: Community metrics review, identify new candidates
Week 3: Champion spotlight (blog post, tweet, etc.)
# Contributing to [PROJECT]
Thanks for your interest in contributing!
## Quick Start```bash
# One command setup
make dev
# or
docker-compose up
Finding Issues
good-first-issue: Great for first contribution
help-wanted: We'd love help with these
documentation: Improve our docs
Making a Pull Request
Fork the repo
Create a branch: git checkout -b feature/your-feature
Make your changes
Run tests: make test
Push and create PR
What to Expect
First response within 48 hours
We'll provide clear feedback
Small PRs reviewed faster than large ones
Recognition
All contributors are:
Added to CONTRIBUTORS.md
Credited in release notes
Eligible for contributor swag
Questions?
Discord: [link]
Email: contributors@[project].com
### Contributor Recognition
| Contribution Level | Recognition |
|--------------------|-------------|
| First PR merged | Welcome message, added to CONTRIBUTORS |
| 3+ PRs merged | Contributor swag pack |
| 10+ PRs merged | "Core Contributor" label, direct Slack access |
| Sustained contribution | Maintainer invitation, conference sponsorship |
---
## User-Generated Content Programs
### Types of UGC
| Content Type | Value | Effort to Get |
|--------------|-------|---------------|
| Twitter/social mentions | Social proof | Low (happens naturally) |
| Blog posts | SEO, credibility | Medium |
| Video tutorials | Engagement, reach | High |
| Conference talks | Credibility, reach | Very high |
| Extensions/integrations | Ecosystem value | High |
### Encouraging Content Creation
**Passive encouragement**:
- Showcase existing content prominently
- Retweet/share everything created about you
- Feature creators in changelog and newsletters
**Active encouragement**:
- "Write about us" page with resources
- Content bounty program (see below)
- Tutorial template and guidelines
- Conference talk support (slide review, practice)
### Content Bounty Program
Offer compensation for content:
| Content Type | Bounty | Requirements |
|--------------|--------|--------------|
| Blog post | $200-500 | 800+ words, technical depth, original |
| Video tutorial | $300-750 | 5-15 min, good production, task completion |
| Conference talk | $500 + travel | Accepted talk, mentions product genuinely |
| Integration/extension | $500-2000 | Published, documented, maintained |
**Guidelines**:
- Must disclose sponsorship/bounty
- Content must be genuinely useful (not advertorial)
- You get first review but not editorial control
- They retain ownership
### Content Bounty Page Template
```markdown
# Write About [PRODUCT]
We pay developers to create great content.
## What We're Looking For
- Tutorials solving real problems with [PRODUCT]
- Integrations with popular tools
- Conference talks about [CATEGORY]
- Video content (YouTube, courses)
## Bounties
| Type | Amount | Turnaround |
|------|--------|------------|
| Blog post (800+ words) | $200-500 | 2 weeks |
| Video tutorial (5+ min) | $300-750 | 3 weeks |
| Published integration | $500-2000 | Varies |
## How It Works
1. **Pitch**: Email content@[product].com with your idea
2. **Approve**: We'll confirm scope and bounty
3. **Create**: You write/record
4. **Review**: We give feedback (you keep editorial control)
5. **Publish**: You publish on your platform
6. **Payment**: We pay within 5 business days
## Guidelines
- Must disclose: "This post was supported by [PRODUCT]"
- Must be genuinely useful (not an ad)
- You retain ownership of your content
- We may share on our channels (with credit)
## Apply
Email content@[product].com with:
- Your idea (2-3 sentences)
- Your platform/audience
- Requested bounty
- Timeline
We respond within 3 business days.
Referral Programs for Developers
What Works for Developers
Approach
Effectiveness
Notes
Double-sided (both get value)
High
Both referrer and referred benefit
Credits/service
High
Use product more, not cash out
Cash
Medium
Works but feels transactional
Swag only
Low
Not enough for ongoing referrals
Commission/affiliate
Low
Feels like MLM, kills credibility
Referral Program Design
Recommended structure:
Refer a developer to [PRODUCT]:
You get: $50 in credits
They get: $50 in credits + extended trial
No limits. Stack as many as you want.
Why this works:
Both parties benefit (fair)
Credits encourage more usage (flywheel)
No weird commission tracking
Simple to understand
Referral Program Template
# [PRODUCT] Referral Program## How It Works1. Share your referral link: [DASHBOARD/REFERRALS]
2. Friend signs up and becomes a paying customer
3. You both get $50 in credits
## Fine Print- Credits apply to future bills (never cash out)
- Referred user must be new (no existing accounts)
- Referred user must become paying customer
- No limit on referrals
- Credits never expire
## Your Referral Link
[LINK]
## Tracking
See all your referrals at: [DASHBOARD/REFERRALS]
Making Referrals Easy
Shareable link (no codes to remember)
One-click copy button
Pre-written tweet/message to share
Dashboard showing referral status
Email when referral converts
Community Recognition and Rewards
Recognition Hierarchy
Level
Recognition
Examples
Public shoutout
Twitter mention, newsletter feature
"Thanks @jane for the great bug report!"
Spotlight feature
Blog post, video interview
"Developer spotlight: How Jane uses [PRODUCT]"
Contributor page
Website listing
CONTRIBUTORS.md, website wall
Advisory role
Input on roadmap
Beta access, feedback sessions
Formal title
Champion, Ambassador, Maintainer
Badge, bio update
Recognition That Matters
Do:
Be specific about what they did
Be public (with permission)
Be timely (recognize quickly)
Help their career (reference letters, intros)
Give them platform (your blog, your stage)
Don't:
Generic "thanks to our community"
Private thanks for public contribution
Delayed recognition (months later)
Recognition without substance
Titles without actual benefits
Swag That Developers Want
Yes
No
High-quality t-shirts (Bella+Canvas, etc.)
Cheap promotional tees
Quality hoodies
Polyester anything
Useful items (notebooks, cables, bags)
Stress balls, pens
Limited edition / exclusive
Same as conference booth giveaway
Stickers (always)
Outdated branding
Pro tip: Ask your power users what they want. Survey > assumptions.
Recognition Workflow
When someone does something notable:
1. Screenshot/document it (tweet, PR, blog post)
2. Public thank you within 24 hours
3. Add to monthly newsletter spotlight
4. Consider for champion program if pattern continues
5. Update power user tracker
Measuring Advocate Impact
Metrics to Track
Metric
How to Measure
Why It Matters
Content created
Count posts, videos, talks
Reach and awareness
Questions answered
Community activity
Support deflection
Referrals driven
Referral tracking
Direct acquisition
Social mentions
Social listening tools
Organic awareness
PR/contributions
GitHub activity
Product improvement
Attribution Challenges
Developer advocacy is hard to attribute. Accept that:
Blog posts drive signups months later
Word of mouth is invisible
Stack Overflow answers compound
Conference talks reach people who don't convert immediately
Track directionally, not precisely:
Survey new signups: "How did you hear about us?"
Track referral links when used
Monitor social mention trends
Correlate content with traffic spikes
Advocate ROI Calculation
Rough framework:
Champion program cost:
- Swag: $200/person/year
- Conference sponsorship: $2000/person/year
- Staff time: $5000/year total
Total for 10 champions: $27,000/year
Champion value (estimate):
- Average referrals: 5/person/year = 50 total
- Referral LTV: $1000
- Referral value: $50,000
- Content created: 20 posts
- Traffic value: $500/post = $10,000
- Questions answered: 200
- Support deflection: $25/ticket = $5,000
- Social mentions: 100
- Brand value: Hard to quantify
Estimated ROI: ~3x (conservative)
