Skip to main content

dev-sciomc

Scientific method scaffolding — hypothesis → experiment → evidence → conclusion. Use when you need rigorous causal reasoning rather than vibes-based debugging.

Informations de source

Dépôt
evolution-foundation/evo-nexus
Dernière activité de la source
10 avril 2026 à 16:24
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
552
Forks
181

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
dev-sciomc
description
Scientific method scaffolding — hypothesis → experiment → evidence → conclusion. Use when you need rigorous causal reasoning rather than vibes-based debugging.
# Dev Sciomc (Scientific Method) Derived from oh-my-claudecode (MIT, Yeachan Heo). Adapted for the EvoNexus Engineering Layer. Scientific method discipline applied to engineering investigations. Forces explicit hypothesis statement, experimental design, evidence collection, and provisional conclusions. ## Use When - Investigation requires rigor beyond "let me try X" - Performance optimization (you need controls and measurements, not guesses) - A/B comparison of two implementations - Anything where the cost of being wrong is high ## Do Not Use When - Trivial bug → use `@hawk-debugger` - Pure exploration → use `@scout-explorer` ## Workflow ### Phase 1 — Hypothesis - State the hypothesis as a falsifiable claim - "X is faster than Y" not "X feels faster" - Identify the dependent variable, independent variables, controls ### Phase 2 — Experiment Design - What measurement will prove/disprove the hypothesis? - What's the minimum sample size for statistical significance? - What confounders need to be controlled? ### Phase 3 — Evidence Collection - Run the experiment - Collect raw data - Note environmental factors that could affect results ### Phase 4 — Analysis - Apply statistical tests (delegate to `@prism-scientist`) - Calculate effect size, CI, p-value - Compare against the hypothesis ### Phase 5 — Conclusion - Provisional, never absolute - State limitations - Identify follow-up experiments ## Output Saved to `workspace/development/research/[C]sciomc-{topic}-{date}.md`: ```markdown ## Scientific Investigation — {topic} ### Hypothesis {Falsifiable claim} ### Experimental Design - Dependent variable: {what we measure} - Independent variables: {what we vary} - Controls: {what we hold constant} - Sample size: {N} ### Method {Step-by-step protocol} ### Results {Raw data summary} ### Statistical Analysis [delegated to @prism-scientist] ### Conclusion {Provisional conclusion + limitations} ### Follow-ups - {next experiment} ``` ## Pairs With - `@prism-scientist` (for statistical analysis) - `@trail-tracer` (when investigation is causal) - `@apex-architect` (when conclusion implies architecture change)
Voir sur GitHub