Skip to main content

dev-sciomc

Scientific method scaffolding — hypothesis → experiment → evidence → conclusion. Use when you need rigorous causal reasoning rather than vibes-based debugging.

소스 정보

저장소
evolution-foundation/evo-nexus
최근 소스 활동
2026년 4월 10일 16:24
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
548
포크
180

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
dev-sciomc
description
Scientific method scaffolding — hypothesis → experiment → evidence → conclusion. Use when you need rigorous causal reasoning rather than vibes-based debugging.
# Dev Sciomc (Scientific Method) Derived from oh-my-claudecode (MIT, Yeachan Heo). Adapted for the EvoNexus Engineering Layer. Scientific method discipline applied to engineering investigations. Forces explicit hypothesis statement, experimental design, evidence collection, and provisional conclusions. ## Use When - Investigation requires rigor beyond "let me try X" - Performance optimization (you need controls and measurements, not guesses) - A/B comparison of two implementations - Anything where the cost of being wrong is high ## Do Not Use When - Trivial bug → use `@hawk-debugger` - Pure exploration → use `@scout-explorer` ## Workflow ### Phase 1 — Hypothesis - State the hypothesis as a falsifiable claim - "X is faster than Y" not "X feels faster" - Identify the dependent variable, independent variables, controls ### Phase 2 — Experiment Design - What measurement will prove/disprove the hypothesis? - What's the minimum sample size for statistical significance? - What confounders need to be controlled? ### Phase 3 — Evidence Collection - Run the experiment - Collect raw data - Note environmental factors that could affect results ### Phase 4 — Analysis - Apply statistical tests (delegate to `@prism-scientist`) - Calculate effect size, CI, p-value - Compare against the hypothesis ### Phase 5 — Conclusion - Provisional, never absolute - State limitations - Identify follow-up experiments ## Output Saved to `workspace/development/research/[C]sciomc-{topic}-{date}.md`: ```markdown ## Scientific Investigation — {topic} ### Hypothesis {Falsifiable claim} ### Experimental Design - Dependent variable: {what we measure} - Independent variables: {what we vary} - Controls: {what we hold constant} - Sample size: {N} ### Method {Step-by-step protocol} ### Results {Raw data summary} ### Statistical Analysis [delegated to @prism-scientist] ### Conclusion {Provisional conclusion + limitations} ### Follow-ups - {next experiment} ``` ## Pairs With - `@prism-scientist` (for statistical analysis) - `@trail-tracer` (when investigation is causal) - `@apex-architect` (when conclusion implies architecture change)
GitHub에서 보기