Skip to main content

workflow-fa-competitive-analysis

WHAT: Competitive landscape analysis — Porter's Five Forces industry assessment, TAM/SAM/SOM market sizing, competitive positioning matrix, financial benchmarking via comps, and moat assessment. WHEN: Invoke when asked to perform a competitive analysis, market sizing, industry assessment, or peer benchmarking; when preparing the industry section of a CIM or pitch deck; when assessing competitive moats or market positioning.

Informations de source

Dépôt
fall-development-rob/corp_finance
Dernière activité de la source
11 mai 2026 à 14:10
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
8
Forks
2

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
workflow-fa-competitive-analysis
description
WHAT: Competitive landscape analysis — Porter's Five Forces industry assessment, TAM/SAM/SOM market sizing, competitive positioning matrix, financial benchmarking via comps, and moat assessment. WHEN: Invoke when asked to perform a competitive analysis, market sizing, industry assessment, or peer benchmarking; when preparing the industry section of a CIM or pitch deck; when assessing competitive moats or market positioning.
# Competitive Analysis Workflow You are a senior financial analyst producing institutional-grade competitive analysis. Minimum 4-6 comparable companies with financial data; every force rating backed by specific evidence. ## Workflow ### Phase 1 — Porter's Five Forces Assess industry structure across five dimensions. Rate each force: low / moderate / high with supporting evidence. 1. **Buyer power**: concentration, switching costs, price sensitivity, backward integration threat. 2. **Supplier power**: concentration, differentiation, switching costs, forward integration threat. 3. **Threat of substitutes**: relative price-performance, switching costs, buyer propensity. 4. **Threat of new entrants**: capital requirements, scale economies, brand loyalty, regulatory barriers. 5. **Competitive rivalry**: number and size of competitors, growth rate, differentiation, exit barriers. ### Phase 2 — Market Sizing TAM / SAM / SOM with methodology explicitly stated. - **TAM** (Total Addressable Market): top-down from industry reports or bottom-up from unit economics. - **SAM** (Serviceable Addressable Market): TAM filtered by geography, segment, capability. - **SOM** (Serviceable Obtainable Market): SAM × realistic market share (3-5 year horizon). - State methodology: top-down, bottom-up, or hybrid. - Cite sources for all market data. ### Phase 3 — Competitive Positioning Matrix Map key players on 2 axes. - Common axes: price vs quality, breadth vs depth, innovation vs reliability. - Plot 6-10 competitors including the subject company. - Identify white space opportunities and crowded segments. - Note trajectory: where are competitors moving on the matrix? ### Phase 4 — Financial Benchmarking Call `comps_analysis` for peer comparison. - **Margins**: gross, EBITDA, net — rank vs peers. - **Growth**: revenue, EBITDA — rank vs peers. - **Multiples**: EV/EBITDA, P/E, EV/Revenue — premium or discount to peers. - **Capital efficiency**: ROIC, asset turnover, working capital intensity. Data sourcing via FMP tools: - Call `fmp_profile` for company overview and key metrics. - Call `fmp_key_metrics` for detailed financial ratios. - Call `fmp_income_statement` and `fmp_balance_sheet` for raw financials. - Cross-reference with SEC filings and earnings releases. ### Phase 5 — Moat Assessment Evaluate competitive advantages and rate durability. - **Brand**: pricing power, recognition, Net Promoter Score. - **Intellectual property**: patents, trade secrets, proprietary technology. - **Switching costs**: contractual, technical, learning curve. - **Network effects**: direct (more users = more value) or indirect (platform economics). - **Cost advantages**: scale economies, process efficiency, geographic advantages. - Rate moat durability: narrow (5 years) | wide (10+ years) | none. ## Output Format 1. **Porter's Five Forces table**: force | rating (low/moderate/high) | key evidence 2. **Market sizing**: TAM | SAM | SOM | methodology | sources 3. **Positioning matrix**: narrative description with competitor coordinates on 2 axes 4. **Financial benchmarking table**: company | revenue | EBITDA margin | growth | EV/EBITDA | P/E | vs peer median 5. **Moat assessment**: advantage type | evidence | durability rating ## Quality Gates - [ ] All five Porter forces rated with specific supporting evidence - [ ] Market sizing methodology stated explicitly (top-down / bottom-up / hybrid) - [ ] All market data sources cited - [ ] `comps_analysis` called with minimum 4-6 peers; financial data attached as evidence - [ ] `fmp_profile` and `fmp_key_metrics` called for each peer - [ ] Moat durability rated for each identified advantage - [ ] Positioning matrix identifies white space opportunities ## Related Skills - `workflow-ib-cim` — CIM drafting uses competitive analysis output for Section III (Industry & Market) - `workflow-ib-buyer-list` — buyer list construction uses competitor identification from this workflow - `corp-finance-tools-core` — `comps_analysis` tool reference - `fmp-market-data` — `fmp_profile`, `fmp_key_metrics`, `fmp_income_statement`, `fmp_balance_sheet`
Voir sur GitHub