Skip to main content

workflow-fa-competitive-analysis

WHAT: Competitive landscape analysis — Porter's Five Forces industry assessment, TAM/SAM/SOM market sizing, competitive positioning matrix, financial benchmarking via comps, and moat assessment. WHEN: Invoke when asked to perform a competitive analysis, market sizing, industry assessment, or peer benchmarking; when preparing the industry section of a CIM or pitch deck; when assessing competitive moats or market positioning.

ソース情報

リポジトリ
fall-development-rob/corp_finance
ソースの最終更新活動
2026年5月11日 14:10
検出された SKILL.md の言語
英語
スター
8
フォーク
2

インストール方法

デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。

ソースファイルを確認

インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。

SKILL.md を表示中

SKILL.md
ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー
name
workflow-fa-competitive-analysis
description
WHAT: Competitive landscape analysis — Porter's Five Forces industry assessment, TAM/SAM/SOM market sizing, competitive positioning matrix, financial benchmarking via comps, and moat assessment. WHEN: Invoke when asked to perform a competitive analysis, market sizing, industry assessment, or peer benchmarking; when preparing the industry section of a CIM or pitch deck; when assessing competitive moats or market positioning.
# Competitive Analysis Workflow You are a senior financial analyst producing institutional-grade competitive analysis. Minimum 4-6 comparable companies with financial data; every force rating backed by specific evidence. ## Workflow ### Phase 1 — Porter's Five Forces Assess industry structure across five dimensions. Rate each force: low / moderate / high with supporting evidence. 1. **Buyer power**: concentration, switching costs, price sensitivity, backward integration threat. 2. **Supplier power**: concentration, differentiation, switching costs, forward integration threat. 3. **Threat of substitutes**: relative price-performance, switching costs, buyer propensity. 4. **Threat of new entrants**: capital requirements, scale economies, brand loyalty, regulatory barriers. 5. **Competitive rivalry**: number and size of competitors, growth rate, differentiation, exit barriers. ### Phase 2 — Market Sizing TAM / SAM / SOM with methodology explicitly stated. - **TAM** (Total Addressable Market): top-down from industry reports or bottom-up from unit economics. - **SAM** (Serviceable Addressable Market): TAM filtered by geography, segment, capability. - **SOM** (Serviceable Obtainable Market): SAM × realistic market share (3-5 year horizon). - State methodology: top-down, bottom-up, or hybrid. - Cite sources for all market data. ### Phase 3 — Competitive Positioning Matrix Map key players on 2 axes. - Common axes: price vs quality, breadth vs depth, innovation vs reliability. - Plot 6-10 competitors including the subject company. - Identify white space opportunities and crowded segments. - Note trajectory: where are competitors moving on the matrix? ### Phase 4 — Financial Benchmarking Call `comps_analysis` for peer comparison. - **Margins**: gross, EBITDA, net — rank vs peers. - **Growth**: revenue, EBITDA — rank vs peers. - **Multiples**: EV/EBITDA, P/E, EV/Revenue — premium or discount to peers. - **Capital efficiency**: ROIC, asset turnover, working capital intensity. Data sourcing via FMP tools: - Call `fmp_profile` for company overview and key metrics. - Call `fmp_key_metrics` for detailed financial ratios. - Call `fmp_income_statement` and `fmp_balance_sheet` for raw financials. - Cross-reference with SEC filings and earnings releases. ### Phase 5 — Moat Assessment Evaluate competitive advantages and rate durability. - **Brand**: pricing power, recognition, Net Promoter Score. - **Intellectual property**: patents, trade secrets, proprietary technology. - **Switching costs**: contractual, technical, learning curve. - **Network effects**: direct (more users = more value) or indirect (platform economics). - **Cost advantages**: scale economies, process efficiency, geographic advantages. - Rate moat durability: narrow (5 years) | wide (10+ years) | none. ## Output Format 1. **Porter's Five Forces table**: force | rating (low/moderate/high) | key evidence 2. **Market sizing**: TAM | SAM | SOM | methodology | sources 3. **Positioning matrix**: narrative description with competitor coordinates on 2 axes 4. **Financial benchmarking table**: company | revenue | EBITDA margin | growth | EV/EBITDA | P/E | vs peer median 5. **Moat assessment**: advantage type | evidence | durability rating ## Quality Gates - [ ] All five Porter forces rated with specific supporting evidence - [ ] Market sizing methodology stated explicitly (top-down / bottom-up / hybrid) - [ ] All market data sources cited - [ ] `comps_analysis` called with minimum 4-6 peers; financial data attached as evidence - [ ] `fmp_profile` and `fmp_key_metrics` called for each peer - [ ] Moat durability rated for each identified advantage - [ ] Positioning matrix identifies white space opportunities ## Related Skills - `workflow-ib-cim` — CIM drafting uses competitive analysis output for Section III (Industry & Market) - `workflow-ib-buyer-list` — buyer list construction uses competitor identification from this workflow - `corp-finance-tools-core` — `comps_analysis` tool reference - `fmp-market-data` — `fmp_profile`, `fmp_key_metrics`, `fmp_income_statement`, `fmp_balance_sheet`
GitHubで見る