fact-checking
Review and validate claims using counter-hypothesis testing. Use when verifying technical content, checking references, validating API endpoints, or performing quality assurance on deliverables.
Informations de source
- Dépôt
- github/gh-aw
- Dernière activité de la source
- 17 août 2026 à 21:20
- Langue détectée de SKILL.md
- anglais
- Étoiles
- 5 624
- Forks
- 625
Options d'installation
Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.
Vérifiez les fichiers source
Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.
Affichage de SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule- name
- fact-checking
- description
- Review and validate claims using counter-hypothesis testing. Use when verifying technical content, checking references, validating API endpoints, or performing quality assurance on deliverables.
- license
- MIT
- compatibility
- Requires access to external references and APIs
- metadata
- {"author":"squad","version":"1.0.0","domain":"quality, verification","confidence":"low","last_validated":"2026-03-01"}
# Skill: Fact Checking
## Context
Codifies the challenger agent review output format and methodology so any agent performing fact-checking or review produces consistent, structured output.
## Pattern
### Review Methodology
For every claim or deliverable under review:
1. Ask: "What evidence supports this? What would disprove it?"
2. Generate counter-hypotheses and test them against available data
3. Verify URLs, package names, API endpoints, and external references actually exist
4. Flag confidence levels: ✅ Verified, ⚠️ Unverified, ❌ Contradicted
### Review Output Format
When reviewing another agent's work, use this template:
```
### Fact Check — {deliverable name}
**Claims verified:** {count}
**Issues found:** {count}
| # | Claim | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|-------|--------|---------------|
| 1 | {claim} | ✅/⚠️/❌ | {supporting or contradicting evidence} |
**Counter-hypotheses tested:**
- {alternative explanation + result}
**Verdict:** {PASS / PASS WITH NOTES / NEEDS REVISION}
```
### Confidence Levels
- ✅ **Verified** — evidence confirms the claim
- ⚠️ **Unverified** — cannot confirm or deny; suggest verification method
- ❌ **Contradicted** — evidence disproves the claim
### Ceremony Integration
Auto-trigger this skill before any architecture decision, or when an agent claim contains superlatives or percentage thresholds (e.g., "saves 75%", "always", "never"). The coordinator spawns the challenger agent with:
```
Challenger — fact-check {agent}'s claim: "{claim}"
Cite evidence for every verdict. Max 3 investigation cycles.
```
Voir sur GitHub