fact-checking
Review and validate claims using counter-hypothesis testing. Use when verifying technical content, checking references, validating API endpoints, or performing quality assurance on deliverables.
Quellinformationen
- Repository
- github/gh-aw
- Letzte Quellaktivität
- 17. August 2026 um 21:20
- Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
- Englisch
- Sterne
- 5.404
- Forks
- 588
Installationsoptionen
Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
SKILL.md wird angezeigt
SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau- name
- fact-checking
- description
- Review and validate claims using counter-hypothesis testing. Use when verifying technical content, checking references, validating API endpoints, or performing quality assurance on deliverables.
- license
- MIT
- compatibility
- Requires access to external references and APIs
- metadata
- {"author":"squad","version":"1.0.0","domain":"quality, verification","confidence":"low","last_validated":"2026-03-01"}
# Skill: Fact Checking
## Context
Codifies the challenger agent review output format and methodology so any agent performing fact-checking or review produces consistent, structured output.
## Pattern
### Review Methodology
For every claim or deliverable under review:
1. Ask: "What evidence supports this? What would disprove it?"
2. Generate counter-hypotheses and test them against available data
3. Verify URLs, package names, API endpoints, and external references actually exist
4. Flag confidence levels: ✅ Verified, ⚠️ Unverified, ❌ Contradicted
### Review Output Format
When reviewing another agent's work, use this template:
```
### Fact Check — {deliverable name}
**Claims verified:** {count}
**Issues found:** {count}
| # | Claim | Status | Evidence/Notes |
|---|-------|--------|---------------|
| 1 | {claim} | ✅/⚠️/❌ | {supporting or contradicting evidence} |
**Counter-hypotheses tested:**
- {alternative explanation + result}
**Verdict:** {PASS / PASS WITH NOTES / NEEDS REVISION}
```
### Confidence Levels
- ✅ **Verified** — evidence confirms the claim
- ⚠️ **Unverified** — cannot confirm or deny; suggest verification method
- ❌ **Contradicted** — evidence disproves the claim
### Ceremony Integration
Auto-trigger this skill before any architecture decision, or when an agent claim contains superlatives or percentage thresholds (e.g., "saves 75%", "always", "never"). The coordinator spawns the challenger agent with:
```
Challenger — fact-check {agent}'s claim: "{claim}"
Cite evidence for every verdict. Max 3 investigation cycles.
```
Auf GitHub ansehen