Skip to main content

multi-agent-density-control

Stochastic Density-Driven Optimal Control (D²OC) for multi-agent coverage and distribution matching. Uses Wasserstein distance as running cost with convergence guarantees for stochastic LTI systems. Use when designing decentralized multi-agent coverage, area coverage, distribution matching, or swarm control systems.

Aller à l'installation

Informations de source

Dépôt
hiyenwong/ai_collection
Dernière activité de la source
4 juin 2026 à 13:32
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
2
Forks
0

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
multi-agent-density-control
description
Stochastic Density-Driven Optimal Control (D²OC) for multi-agent coverage and distribution matching. Uses Wasserstein distance as running cost with convergence guarantees for stochastic LTI systems. Use when designing decentralized multi-agent coverage, area coverage, distribution matching, or swarm control systems.
# Density-Driven Optimal Control for Stochastic Multi-Agent Systems ## Core Problem **Non-uniform area coverage** for multi-agent systems: - Spatial priority variations - Resource constraints - Decentralized coordination - Stochastic dynamics Traditional approaches rely on: - Eulerian PDE solvers (computationally heavy) - Heuristic planning (no guarantees) ## Key Innovation: Stochastic D²OC **Density-Driven Optimal Control (D²OC)**: A Lagrangian framework bridging individual agent dynamics with collective distribution matching. ### Core Idea Minimize the difference between: 1. **Empirical distribution** of agent positions (time-averaged) 2. **Target density** (non-parametric spatial priority) Using **Wasserstein distance** as the cost function. ## Mathematical Formulation ### Agent Dynamics (Stochastic LTI) ``` x_{k+1} = A x_k + B u_k + w_k y_k = C x_k + v_k ``` Where: - `x_k`: Agent state (position + velocity) - `u_k`: Control input - `w_k`: Process noise - `v_k`: Measurement noise ### Empirical Distribution For N agents over time window T: ``` μ_empirical = (1/NT) Σ_{i=1}^N Σ_{k=1}^T δ(x_i(k)) ``` ### Control Objective ``` min_u Σ_{k=0}^H W_2(μ_k, μ_target) + R(u_k)² ``` Where: - `W_2`: 2-Wasserstein distance - `μ_target`: Desired spatial density - `R(u)`: Control effort penalty ## Convergence Guarantee **Theorem**: Under stochastic LTI dynamics with bounded noise, the time-averaged empirical distribution converges to the target density with bounded tracking error. ### Key Conditions 1. **Reachability**: Target density support reachable from initial positions 2. **Noise bounded**: Process and measurement noise have bounded covariance 3. **Persistence of excitation**: Sufficient exploration of state space ## Algorithm Structure ### MPC-like Formulation ``` At each time step t: 1. Measure current states {x_i} 2. Solve finite-horizon optimization: min_{u_0:H} Σ_{k=0}^H W_2(μ_k, μ_target) + R(u_k)² subject to: dynamics, constraints 3. Apply first control u_0 4. Repeat ``` ### Decentralized Implementation Each agent solves local optimization: - Local objective: Contribution to global distribution - Communication: Share planned trajectories - Consensus: Coordinate density contributions ## Applications ### 1. Environmental Monitoring - Non-uniform sensor placement - Priority-based coverage - Adaptive patrolling ### 2. Search and Rescue - Probability-based area coverage - Resource allocation - Dynamic priority updates ### 3. Agricultural Robotics - Variable-rate application - Field coverage optimization - Precision agriculture ### 4. Surveillance - Priority-based monitoring - Intruder detection - Dynamic redeployment ## Comparison with Existing Methods | Method | Optimality | Decentralized | Guarantees | Complexity | |--------|------------|---------------|------------|------------| | D²OC | High | Yes | Convergence | Moderate | | Voronoi coverage | Medium | Yes | Local optima | Low | | PDE-based | High | No | Convergence | High | | Heuristic | Low | Varies | None | Low | ## Implementation Considerations ### Wasserstein Distance Computation - **Exact**: Linear programming (expensive for large N) - **Approximate**: Sliced Wasserstein, Sinkhorn divergence - **Discretization**: Grid-based approximation ### Communication Requirements - Trajectory sharing: O(N × H) per iteration - Density estimation: Distributed averaging - Consensus: Iterative protocols ### Computational Complexity Per-agent optimization: O(H × dim) with H horizon, dim state dimension ## Design Parameters | Parameter | Effect | Typical Range | |-----------|--------|---------------| | Horizon H | Plan quality | 10-50 steps | | Control penalty R | Smoothness | [0.01, 1.0] | | Communication rate | Coordination | 1-10 Hz | ## Paper Reference **Title**: Density-Driven Optimal Control: Convergence Guarantees for Stochastic LTI Multi-Agent Systems **Author**: Kooktae Lee **arXiv**: 2604.08495 **Category**: math.OC, cs.MA, cs.RO, eess.SY **Published**: 2026-04-09 ## Key Equations ### Wasserstein Distance (2-Wasserstein) ``` W_2(μ, ν) = (inf_{γ∈Γ(μ,ν)} ∫||x-y||² dγ(x,y))^{1/2} ``` ### Convergence Bound ``` E[||μ_T - μ_target||] ≤ C/√T + O(σ²) ``` Where σ is noise magnitude.
Voir sur GitHub