Skip to main content

multi-agent-density-control

Stochastic Density-Driven Optimal Control (D²OC) for multi-agent coverage and distribution matching. Uses Wasserstein distance as running cost with convergence guarantees for stochastic LTI systems. Use when designing decentralized multi-agent coverage, area coverage, distribution matching, or swarm control systems.

Ir para a instalação

Informações da origem

Repositório
hiyenwong/ai_collection
Última atividade na origem
4 de junho de 2026 às 13:32
Idioma detectado do SKILL.md
inglês
Estrelas
2
Forks
0

Opções de instalação

Por padrão, está selecionado o prompt que primeiro revisa a origem. Você pode mudar para um comando direto ou baixar uma cópia local.

Revise os arquivos de origem

Leia o SKILL.md e os arquivos complementares exibidos pelo SkillsMP antes de decidir se vai instalar.

Exibindo SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura
name
multi-agent-density-control
description
Stochastic Density-Driven Optimal Control (D²OC) for multi-agent coverage and distribution matching. Uses Wasserstein distance as running cost with convergence guarantees for stochastic LTI systems. Use when designing decentralized multi-agent coverage, area coverage, distribution matching, or swarm control systems.
# Density-Driven Optimal Control for Stochastic Multi-Agent Systems ## Core Problem **Non-uniform area coverage** for multi-agent systems: - Spatial priority variations - Resource constraints - Decentralized coordination - Stochastic dynamics Traditional approaches rely on: - Eulerian PDE solvers (computationally heavy) - Heuristic planning (no guarantees) ## Key Innovation: Stochastic D²OC **Density-Driven Optimal Control (D²OC)**: A Lagrangian framework bridging individual agent dynamics with collective distribution matching. ### Core Idea Minimize the difference between: 1. **Empirical distribution** of agent positions (time-averaged) 2. **Target density** (non-parametric spatial priority) Using **Wasserstein distance** as the cost function. ## Mathematical Formulation ### Agent Dynamics (Stochastic LTI) ``` x_{k+1} = A x_k + B u_k + w_k y_k = C x_k + v_k ``` Where: - `x_k`: Agent state (position + velocity) - `u_k`: Control input - `w_k`: Process noise - `v_k`: Measurement noise ### Empirical Distribution For N agents over time window T: ``` μ_empirical = (1/NT) Σ_{i=1}^N Σ_{k=1}^T δ(x_i(k)) ``` ### Control Objective ``` min_u Σ_{k=0}^H W_2(μ_k, μ_target) + R(u_k)² ``` Where: - `W_2`: 2-Wasserstein distance - `μ_target`: Desired spatial density - `R(u)`: Control effort penalty ## Convergence Guarantee **Theorem**: Under stochastic LTI dynamics with bounded noise, the time-averaged empirical distribution converges to the target density with bounded tracking error. ### Key Conditions 1. **Reachability**: Target density support reachable from initial positions 2. **Noise bounded**: Process and measurement noise have bounded covariance 3. **Persistence of excitation**: Sufficient exploration of state space ## Algorithm Structure ### MPC-like Formulation ``` At each time step t: 1. Measure current states {x_i} 2. Solve finite-horizon optimization: min_{u_0:H} Σ_{k=0}^H W_2(μ_k, μ_target) + R(u_k)² subject to: dynamics, constraints 3. Apply first control u_0 4. Repeat ``` ### Decentralized Implementation Each agent solves local optimization: - Local objective: Contribution to global distribution - Communication: Share planned trajectories - Consensus: Coordinate density contributions ## Applications ### 1. Environmental Monitoring - Non-uniform sensor placement - Priority-based coverage - Adaptive patrolling ### 2. Search and Rescue - Probability-based area coverage - Resource allocation - Dynamic priority updates ### 3. Agricultural Robotics - Variable-rate application - Field coverage optimization - Precision agriculture ### 4. Surveillance - Priority-based monitoring - Intruder detection - Dynamic redeployment ## Comparison with Existing Methods | Method | Optimality | Decentralized | Guarantees | Complexity | |--------|------------|---------------|------------|------------| | D²OC | High | Yes | Convergence | Moderate | | Voronoi coverage | Medium | Yes | Local optima | Low | | PDE-based | High | No | Convergence | High | | Heuristic | Low | Varies | None | Low | ## Implementation Considerations ### Wasserstein Distance Computation - **Exact**: Linear programming (expensive for large N) - **Approximate**: Sliced Wasserstein, Sinkhorn divergence - **Discretization**: Grid-based approximation ### Communication Requirements - Trajectory sharing: O(N × H) per iteration - Density estimation: Distributed averaging - Consensus: Iterative protocols ### Computational Complexity Per-agent optimization: O(H × dim) with H horizon, dim state dimension ## Design Parameters | Parameter | Effect | Typical Range | |-----------|--------|---------------| | Horizon H | Plan quality | 10-50 steps | | Control penalty R | Smoothness | [0.01, 1.0] | | Communication rate | Coordination | 1-10 Hz | ## Paper Reference **Title**: Density-Driven Optimal Control: Convergence Guarantees for Stochastic LTI Multi-Agent Systems **Author**: Kooktae Lee **arXiv**: 2604.08495 **Category**: math.OC, cs.MA, cs.RO, eess.SY **Published**: 2026-04-09 ## Key Equations ### Wasserstein Distance (2-Wasserstein) ``` W_2(μ, ν) = (inf_{γ∈Γ(μ,ν)} ∫||x-y||² dγ(x,y))^{1/2} ``` ### Convergence Bound ``` E[||μ_T - μ_target||] ≤ C/√T + O(σ²) ``` Where σ is noise magnitude.
Ver no GitHub