Menu
SkillsMP a collecté 59 skills depuis joenandez/caspar. Ouvrez un skill pour examiner sa source et ses détails.
Affichage de 40 skills collectés sur 59.
Use when modifying the Codex CASPAR install flow, project skill syncing, learn/recall registry files, or Codex-specific runtime files. TRIGGER when: codex, caspar, codex install, project skills, registry, caspar-learn, caspar-recall, config.toml, doctor
Langue du texte source : anglais
Run an independent adversarial code review of completed work using a pinned high-effort opposing runtime, with a same-contract native fallback. Finds bugs, correctness and security failures, regressions, performance landmines, overengineering, and missing…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Build the planned feature from a compact execute.md index and sliceable tasks.json detail, dispatching parallel task waves through deterministic checks, lightweight sentinel review, and final adversarial review/validation. Trigger after execute.md/tasks.json…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when rendering the Next Steps footer at the end of any caspar command, suggesting which caspar command to run next, or answering "what command should I run?" / "how does the workflow work?". Do NOT use mid-task or for executing a phase — this only renders…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Independent adversarial review of plan.md before task generation. Use a pinned high-effort opposite-runtime reviewer; fall back to one native reviewer with the same contract when unavailable. Trigger after create_plan and before create_tasks. Do NOT review…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Adversarial review of generated execute.md + tasks.json against a reviewed plan using a pinned high-effort opposite runtime, with a same-contract native fallback. Checks translation, criteria, RED pairing, dependencies, waves, and alignment. Do NOT review…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Run an independent adversarial code review of completed work using a pinned high-effort opposing runtime, with a same-contract native fallback. Finds bugs, correctness and security failures, regressions, performance landmines, overengineering, and missing…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Build the planned feature from a compact execute.md index and sliceable tasks.json detail, dispatching parallel task waves through deterministic checks, lightweight sentinel review, and final adversarial review/validation. Trigger after execute.md/tasks.json…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when rendering the Next Steps footer at the end of any caspar command, suggesting which caspar command to run next, or answering "what command should I run?" / "how does the workflow work?". Do NOT use mid-task or for executing a phase — this only renders…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Independent adversarial review of plan.md before task generation. Use a pinned high-effort opposite-runtime reviewer; fall back to one native reviewer with the same contract when unavailable. Trigger after create_plan and before create_tasks. Do NOT review…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Adversarial review of generated execute.md + tasks.json against a reviewed plan using a pinned high-effort opposite runtime, with a same-contract native fallback. Checks translation, criteria, RED pairing, dependencies, waves, and alignment. Do NOT review…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Break requirements into executable task artifacts: a compact execute.md index plus sliceable tasks.json detail with typed acceptance criteria, RED-test pairing, and dependency waves. Trigger after scope/plan when you need concrete build tasks before execute.…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Unified planning entry point: classify tier, run tier-sized research, then route to the smallest safe plan→task-artifacts→review workflow. Use after scope or for "plan this/how build this" requests. Do NOT trigger for scope, specific bug diagnosis, or direct…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Break requirements into executable task artifacts: a compact execute.md index plus sliceable tasks.json detail with typed acceptance criteria, RED-test pairing, and dependency waves. Trigger after scope/plan when you need concrete build tasks before execute.…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Unified planning entry point: classify tier, run tier-sized research, then route to the smallest safe plan→task-artifacts→review workflow. Use after scope or for "plan this/how build this" requests. Do NOT trigger for scope, specific bug diagnosis, or direct…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Run the lightweight Caspar release flow: commit pending Caspar changes, sync Codex assets, run tests, bump marketplace/plugin/package versions, commit and push, refresh the user-level Codex install, and print the Claude Code marketplace update command. Use…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Meta cleanup workflow: orchestrate prune, risk-based automated tests, and sweep/commit through focused subagents. Use after execute/validate or when asked to clean up a finished branch end-to-end. Do NOT trigger for dead-code-only cleanup (caspar-prune),…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Find and remove confirmed-safe dead code and artifacts from a scoped working set — orphaned imports/exports, unused code, commented-out blocks, debug/temp logging, duplication, AI slop — while surfacing uncertain items for manual review. Use for…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Light pre-commit cleanup pass — diff sanity, log/dead-code hygiene on changed files, strict lint, run related + broad tests, then conventional-commit. Use when wrapping up uncommitted or just-finished work before check-in ("sweep", "clean up and commit",…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Triage a working set into risk tiers (P0–P3) and add risk-appropriate behavioral tests — thorough coverage where bugs hurt users (auth/payment/security/PII), light or none on low-risk code — fixing lint and committing per passing batch. Trigger after a…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Validate that completed implementation actually delivers the scope/tasks requirements — chunks the work into areas, dispatches parallel @caspar:analyst validators that trace each requirement from user action to render, and writes one actionable…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Meta cleanup workflow: orchestrate prune, risk-based automated tests, and sweep/commit through focused subagents. Use after execute/validate or when asked to clean up a finished branch end-to-end. Do NOT trigger for dead-code-only cleanup (caspar-prune),…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Find and remove confirmed-safe dead code and artifacts from a scoped working set — orphaned imports/exports, unused code, commented-out blocks, debug/temp logging, duplication, AI slop — while surfacing uncertain items for manual review. Use for…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Light pre-commit cleanup pass — diff sanity, log/dead-code hygiene on changed files, strict lint, run related + broad tests, then conventional-commit. Use when wrapping up uncommitted or just-finished work before check-in ("sweep", "clean up and commit",…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Triage a working set into risk tiers (P0–P3) and add risk-appropriate behavioral tests — thorough coverage where bugs hurt users (auth/payment/security/PII), light or none on low-risk code — fixing lint and committing per passing batch. Trigger after a…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Validate that completed implementation actually delivers the scope/tasks requirements — chunks the work into areas, dispatches parallel @caspar:analyst validators that trace each requirement from user action to render, and writes one actionable…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Generate a high-quality pull request from the actual diff and open it via gh — derives What from the diff, Why from commits/linked issue/branch, Testing from real test changes, scales the template to PR size, self-verifies every claim against a diff hunk,…
Langue du texte source : anglais
👻 | Autonomous end-to-end delivery — brain dump → scope → TDD → sweep → rebase → PR, zero confirmation gates. Use when you want a reviewable PR produced hands-off from an informal description. Do NOT use when you want approval checkpoints (use the staged…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Generate a high-quality pull request from the actual diff and open it via gh — derives What from the diff, Why from commits/linked issue/branch, Testing from real test changes, scales the template to PR size, self-verifies every claim against a diff hunk,…
Langue du texte source : anglais
👻 | Autonomous end-to-end delivery — brain dump → scope → TDD → sweep → rebase → PR, zero confirmation gates. Use when you want a reviewable PR produced hands-off from an informal description. Do NOT use when you want approval checkpoints (use the staged…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when user wants to search for existing knowledge, recall a specific learning, or discover what knowledge is available.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Rewrite a verbose SPECTRE skill into a compact, contract-form Caspar skill proposal — clear on WHAT, silent on HOW — grounded in the caspar-light distillation and freedom-tier budget. Use when compressing or forking a `spectre-*` skill into `caspar-*`, when…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Rewrite Caspar subagent definitions into compact, contract-driven agents with clear routing, least-privilege tools, output schemas, and an auditable rewrite trail. Use when reviewing or rewriting `plugins/caspar/agents/*.md`, when the user asks to improve…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Run the Caspar release workflow, including version bumps, Codex sync, global Codex install verification, GitHub release, manual npm publish handoff, npm verification, and final global Codex refresh.
Langue du texte source : anglais
Turn a PRD/scope into a technical implementation plan (`plan.md`) — codebase research, clarifications, then a verification-spine plan ready for task breakdown. Use when planning HOW to build an already-scoped feature, or when `plan` routes here with a depth…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Generate a right-sized manual test guide for completed work — feature-based checklists scaled to change size, focused on risk. Use after execute/validate when you need a human-runnable QA pass before clean/test. Do NOT use to write automated tests (that's the…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Investigate a reported bug, pin the root cause, and implement a verified fix. Use when given an error, stack trace, failing behavior, or repro steps and asked to diagnose and fix it — the diagnose-then-fix loop. Do NOT use for greenfield feature work (use…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Project kickoff — deep codebase + external research producing an evidence-backed kickoff doc, gap analysis, and MVP path before scoping. Use to start a fresh feature/project from an unclear problem, when the user wants research/options/an MVP recommendation…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Use when the user invokes /learn or asks to remember, save, or capture a pattern, decision, gotcha, procedure, or feature dossier from this session for later re-use ("please remember", "what did we learn?"). Captures durable project knowledge as an on-demand…
Langue du texte source : anglais
Generate a single self-contained, clickable HTML prototype to make a feature visible before planning — resolving ambiguity pre-scope, validating flows pre-plan, or rendering an approved UX spec for stakeholder review. Triggers on "prototype this", "mock up…
Langue du texte source : anglais