Skip to main content

joenandez/caspar

SkillsMP は joenandez/caspar から 59 件の skill を収集しています。skill を開くとソースと詳細を確認できます。

記録された最新のソース活動
SkillsMP カタログ更新
収集済み skills
59
GitHub スター
0
GitHub フォーク
0

収集済み skill 59 件中 40 件を表示しています。

職業分類
その他コンピュータ職
説明

Use when modifying the Codex CASPAR install flow, project skill syncing, learn/recall registry files, or Codex-specific runtime files. TRIGGER when: codex, caspar, codex install, project skills, registry, caspar-learn, caspar-recall, config.toml, doctor

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ソフトウェア品質保証アナリスト・テスター
説明

Run an independent adversarial code review of completed work using a pinned high-effort opposing runtime, with a same-contract native fallback. Finds bugs, correctness and security failures, regressions, performance landmines, overengineering, and missing…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ソフトウェア開発者
説明

Build the planned feature from a compact execute.md index and sliceable tasks.json detail, dispatching parallel task waves through deterministic checks, lightweight sentinel review, and final adversarial review/validation. Trigger after execute.md/tasks.json…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
その他コンピュータ職
説明

Use when rendering the Next Steps footer at the end of any caspar command, suggesting which caspar command to run next, or answering "what command should I run?" / "how does the workflow work?". Do NOT use mid-task or for executing a phase — this only renders…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ソフトウェア品質保証アナリスト・テスター
説明

Independent adversarial review of plan.md before task generation. Use a pinned high-effort opposite-runtime reviewer; fall back to one native reviewer with the same contract when unavailable. Trigger after create_plan and before create_tasks. Do NOT review…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ソフトウェア品質保証アナリスト・テスター
説明

Adversarial review of generated execute.md + tasks.json against a reviewed plan using a pinned high-effort opposite runtime, with a same-contract native fallback. Checks translation, criteria, RED pairing, dependencies, waves, and alignment. Do NOT review…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ソフトウェア品質保証アナリスト・テスター
説明

Run an independent adversarial code review of completed work using a pinned high-effort opposing runtime, with a same-contract native fallback. Finds bugs, correctness and security failures, regressions, performance landmines, overengineering, and missing…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ソフトウェア開発者
説明

Build the planned feature from a compact execute.md index and sliceable tasks.json detail, dispatching parallel task waves through deterministic checks, lightweight sentinel review, and final adversarial review/validation. Trigger after execute.md/tasks.json…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
その他コンピュータ職
説明

Use when rendering the Next Steps footer at the end of any caspar command, suggesting which caspar command to run next, or answering "what command should I run?" / "how does the workflow work?". Do NOT use mid-task or for executing a phase — this only renders…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
その他コンピュータ職
説明

Independent adversarial review of plan.md before task generation. Use a pinned high-effort opposite-runtime reviewer; fall back to one native reviewer with the same contract when unavailable. Trigger after create_plan and before create_tasks. Do NOT review…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
その他コンピュータ職
説明

Adversarial review of generated execute.md + tasks.json against a reviewed plan using a pinned high-effort opposite runtime, with a same-contract native fallback. Checks translation, criteria, RED pairing, dependencies, waves, and alignment. Do NOT review…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ソフトウェア開発者
説明

Break requirements into executable task artifacts: a compact execute.md index plus sliceable tasks.json detail with typed acceptance criteria, RED-test pairing, and dependency waves. Trigger after scope/plan when you need concrete build tasks before execute.…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ソフトウェア開発者
説明

Unified planning entry point: classify tier, run tier-sized research, then route to the smallest safe plan→task-artifacts→review workflow. Use after scope or for "plan this/how build this" requests. Do NOT trigger for scope, specific bug diagnosis, or direct…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ソフトウェア開発者
説明

Break requirements into executable task artifacts: a compact execute.md index plus sliceable tasks.json detail with typed acceptance criteria, RED-test pairing, and dependency waves. Trigger after scope/plan when you need concrete build tasks before execute.…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ソフトウェア開発者
説明

Unified planning entry point: classify tier, run tier-sized research, then route to the smallest safe plan→task-artifacts→review workflow. Use after scope or for "plan this/how build this" requests. Do NOT trigger for scope, specific bug diagnosis, or direct…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ソフトウェア開発者
説明

Run the lightweight Caspar release flow: commit pending Caspar changes, sync Codex assets, run tests, bump marketplace/plugin/package versions, commit and push, refresh the user-level Codex install, and print the Claude Code marketplace update command. Use…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ソフトウェア開発者
説明

Meta cleanup workflow: orchestrate prune, risk-based automated tests, and sweep/commit through focused subagents. Use after execute/validate or when asked to clean up a finished branch end-to-end. Do NOT trigger for dead-code-only cleanup (caspar-prune),…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ソフトウェア開発者
説明

Find and remove confirmed-safe dead code and artifacts from a scoped working set — orphaned imports/exports, unused code, commented-out blocks, debug/temp logging, duplication, AI slop — while surfacing uncertain items for manual review. Use for…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ソフトウェア開発者
説明

Light pre-commit cleanup pass — diff sanity, log/dead-code hygiene on changed files, strict lint, run related + broad tests, then conventional-commit. Use when wrapping up uncommitted or just-finished work before check-in ("sweep", "clean up and commit",…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ソフトウェア品質保証アナリスト・テスター
説明

Triage a working set into risk tiers (P0–P3) and add risk-appropriate behavioral tests — thorough coverage where bugs hurt users (auth/payment/security/PII), light or none on low-risk code — fixing lint and committing per passing batch. Trigger after a…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ソフトウェア品質保証アナリスト・テスター
説明

Validate that completed implementation actually delivers the scope/tasks requirements — chunks the work into areas, dispatches parallel @caspar:analyst validators that trace each requirement from user action to render, and writes one actionable…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ソフトウェア開発者
説明

Meta cleanup workflow: orchestrate prune, risk-based automated tests, and sweep/commit through focused subagents. Use after execute/validate or when asked to clean up a finished branch end-to-end. Do NOT trigger for dead-code-only cleanup (caspar-prune),…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ソフトウェア開発者
説明

Find and remove confirmed-safe dead code and artifacts from a scoped working set — orphaned imports/exports, unused code, commented-out blocks, debug/temp logging, duplication, AI slop — while surfacing uncertain items for manual review. Use for…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ソフトウェア開発者
説明

Light pre-commit cleanup pass — diff sanity, log/dead-code hygiene on changed files, strict lint, run related + broad tests, then conventional-commit. Use when wrapping up uncommitted or just-finished work before check-in ("sweep", "clean up and commit",…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ソフトウェア品質保証アナリスト・テスター
説明

Triage a working set into risk tiers (P0–P3) and add risk-appropriate behavioral tests — thorough coverage where bugs hurt users (auth/payment/security/PII), light or none on low-risk code — fixing lint and committing per passing batch. Trigger after a…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ソフトウェア品質保証アナリスト・テスター
説明

Validate that completed implementation actually delivers the scope/tasks requirements — chunks the work into areas, dispatches parallel @caspar:analyst validators that trace each requirement from user action to render, and writes one actionable…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ソフトウェア開発者
説明

Generate a high-quality pull request from the actual diff and open it via gh — derives What from the diff, Why from commits/linked issue/branch, Testing from real test changes, scales the template to PR size, self-verifies every claim against a diff hunk,…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ソフトウェア開発者
説明

👻 | Autonomous end-to-end delivery — brain dump → scope → TDD → sweep → rebase → PR, zero confirmation gates. Use when you want a reviewable PR produced hands-off from an informal description. Do NOT use when you want approval checkpoints (use the staged…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ソフトウェア開発者
説明

Generate a high-quality pull request from the actual diff and open it via gh — derives What from the diff, Why from commits/linked issue/branch, Testing from real test changes, scales the template to PR size, self-verifies every claim against a diff hunk,…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ソフトウェア開発者
説明

👻 | Autonomous end-to-end delivery — brain dump → scope → TDD → sweep → rebase → PR, zero confirmation gates. Use when you want a reviewable PR produced hands-off from an informal description. Do NOT use when you want approval checkpoints (use the staged…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
その他コンピュータ職
説明

Use when user wants to search for existing knowledge, recall a specific learning, or discover what knowledge is available.

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
その他コンピュータ職
説明

Rewrite a verbose SPECTRE skill into a compact, contract-form Caspar skill proposal — clear on WHAT, silent on HOW — grounded in the caspar-light distillation and freedom-tier budget. Use when compressing or forking a `spectre-*` skill into `caspar-*`, when…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
その他コンピュータ職
説明

Rewrite Caspar subagent definitions into compact, contract-driven agents with clear routing, least-privilege tools, output schemas, and an auditable rewrite trail. Use when reviewing or rewriting `plugins/caspar/agents/*.md`, when the user asks to improve…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ソフトウェア開発者
説明

Run the Caspar release workflow, including version bumps, Codex sync, global Codex install verification, GitHub release, manual npm publish handoff, npm verification, and final global Codex refresh.

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ソフトウェア開発者
説明

Turn a PRD/scope into a technical implementation plan (`plan.md`) — codebase research, clarifications, then a verification-spine plan ready for task breakdown. Use when planning HOW to build an already-scoped feature, or when `plan` routes here with a depth…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ソフトウェア品質保証アナリスト・テスター
説明

Generate a right-sized manual test guide for completed work — feature-based checklists scaled to change size, focused on risk. Use after execute/validate when you need a human-runnable QA pass before clean/test. Do NOT use to write automated tests (that's the…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ソフトウェア開発者
説明

Investigate a reported bug, pin the root cause, and implement a verified fix. Use when given an error, stack trace, failing behavior, or repro steps and asked to diagnose and fix it — the diagnose-then-fix loop. Do NOT use for greenfield feature work (use…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ソフトウェア開発者
説明

Project kickoff — deep codebase + external research producing an evidence-backed kickoff doc, gap analysis, and MVP path before scoping. Use to start a fresh feature/project from an unclear problem, when the user wants research/options/an MVP recommendation…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
その他コンピュータ職
説明

Use when the user invokes /learn or asks to remember, save, or capture a pattern, decision, gotcha, procedure, or feature dossier from this session for later re-use ("please remember", "what did we learn?"). Captures durable project knowledge as an on-demand…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
職業分類
ウェブ開発者
説明

Generate a single self-contained, clickable HTML prototype to make a feature visible before planning — resolving ambiguity pre-scope, validating flows pre-plan, or rendering an approved UX spec for stakeholder review. Triggers on "prototype this", "mock up…

原文の言語: 英語

更新
収集済み skill 59 件中 40 件を表示しています。